schnurrito

It seems that you understand what the term "metaverse" was even supposed to mean; care to enlighten the rest of us?

Why are we giving exposure to someone whose job it is to enforce restrictive copyright laws and who uses the term "intellectual property"?

(6) Subsection (a) shall not apply to hot people.

Like most of the worst bills in the US Congress.

One problem I can think of with the idea of legally requiring browsers to do anything at all is, how does this apply to hobbyist open source browsers? Will it be illegal to start developing a new browser in public unless it already has this feature?

The answer seems to be in this PDF: https://www.ft.dk/samling/20231/almdel/reu/spm/1426/svar/2073769/2913128.pdf

Apparently Google Translate can't translate PDFs, but when I copy and paste the text into Google Translate, I get this:

We know that social media and encrypted services are unfortunately largely used to facilitate many forms of crime. There are examples of how criminal gangs use encrypted platforms to recruit very young people to commit serious crimes, including crimes against humanity. This is an expression of cynicism that is almost completely incomprehensible.
We therefore need to look at how we can eliminate this problem.
Both in terms of what the services themselves do, but also what we, as authorities, can do. It must not be the case that criminals can hide behind encrypted services that the authorities cannot access.
Therefore, we, as a government, will also strengthen the police’s capabilities in the area of ​​decryption, of course under appropriate legal guarantees,
as is also the case today. In addition, the Ministry of Justice's Criminal Justice Committee has just begun a mandate to look at the challenges that technological developments pose to police investigations, including the use of encrypted messaging services. I also note that steps have been taken within the EU towards stronger regulation of, among other things, digital information services and social media platforms. For example, the European Commission has presented a proposal for a new regulation on rules to prevent and combat the sexual abuse of children. The proposed regulation contains rules on obligations for certain online services to minimize the risk that their services are misused for the sexual abuse of children online, and the services may, if necessary, be required to detect, report, remove and block access to material that depicts child sexual abuse.
The government has a strong focus on eliminating digital abuse – this is not least true when it comes to sexual abuse of children – and, unlike the opposition, supports the proposed regulation.

so basically a complete failure to answer the question, containing only things we already knew or could guess, not very interesting

That is not excessively unusual; legal documents contain all kinds of vulgar things that people say to each other (maybe before or after a crime) all the time.

My favorite from my country is (translating approximately, original is in heavy dialect): "The statement 'piss off, ya dogs, so I don't hafta see ya anymore, and I'm shittin' into your wage bags' has the objective declaratory value of an immediate termination of employment."

I think it is asking about the rules of a specific subreddit, which seems like an oddly specific question which people here are unlikely to be able to help with.

Gender dysphoria is a real medical condition which I don't think there's an equivalent for many other things.

I would say it is, but needlessly complex.

You're looking for this I think: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retention_election

On the contrary, it would make it more risky to start a new smaller platform.

in 2025? Vaccines have been available for how many years now? Why does anyone even think about COVID vaccines anymore in this year? We would have figured out any adverse effects by now if there were any.