scrubbles

joined 2 years ago
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've tried and failed a couple of times, would you mind sharing (or dming) your example config? Maybe I'm just a been with sso and can't figure it out

I'm simply happy that they're seeing what they wanted for other people. They voted for the man who openly said he would make life harder and kick people out of their homes, and they gleefully enjoyed it thinking it was only people they disliked.

I'm all for people learning lessons the hard way when they refused to see reason. Especially when the reason was to be kind and empathetic in the first place.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And on top of that for most government workers their paychecks have been remarkably stable. Assuming you'll always be employed plus easy credit and bad financial habits are a bad combination

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It never means anything until it effects them personally. Their family, their friends. Until then it's nothing.

We really are dealing with people who do not have empathy.

I like this... I might take it...

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

They've been spoonfed for so long that they forget that they're the poor people. That sounds mean, but holy fuck, I don't need snap. I personally don't need welfare. I'm doing okay - but I voted for those things because I know people do depend on them. But hooray I guess they voted to lower my taxes probably? I guess enjoy not being able to afford food when I voted to try to protect that?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 6 points 1 month ago (13 children)

I think these next 4 years we're going to see a lot of Americans see how much the depend on the federal government. My brain broke when I saw the woman a couple weeks ago who said "I voted for you, but now you're cutting SNAP?"

He literally said he was going to. You voted that you wanted that

Did they really? Oh my god please tell me your joking, that a company as modern as docker got a freaking oracle CEO. They pulled a Jack Barker. Did he bring his conjoined triangles of success?

I did not understand this. "I cant vote for her because she is bad on the issue i care about, so i will vote for the candidate with an even worse stance!" And to those who didnt vote, well no vote in our shit system is a vote against whatever you prefer.

I've given up on being sympathetic for people who actively try to put these things in place. Like, I'm just jaded now. You voted for this. Congratulations, if this is fatal for your stupid decisions, that's on you. I'm sympathetic to the people with brains who knew this would happen, those people get my sympathy and caring.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't make up for bad container decisions. I run much more complex containers both that split out responsibilities and that contain everything as one container. The size and complexity is irrelevant to the bad design decisions. You can have an image that eats up gigabytes of space that runs off of proper environment/config variables with properly mounted volumes.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a valid reason. I originally joined Discord back in 2016 because of it's easy to use voice. It became the standard for voice chat. Before that I had been using the Xbox party chat and other garbage voice systems.

view more: ‹ prev next ›