I think presidents having immunity is essential to have a functioning democracy. Otherwise the party currently in power could arrest the previous president for something they allegedly did while in power and would set a bad precedent. I think it is best for the presidents to be immune unless impeached by both the house and senate for something particularly heinous. And yes, Trump should probably have been impeached already after the insurrection, but that doesn't change the fact that you can't just willy-nilly arrest some ex president. There is separation of power for a good reason: to not give too much power to any branch of government.
vurr
joined 3 weeks ago
Thanks for the constructive feedback. If the American system would have been functional enough to actually impeach and indict him then we wouldn't have this conversation right now as his immunity would have been stripped. That's impeachments whole point โ to hold people in power, who are otherwise immune from prosecution accountable (at least that's how I understand it), but I totally get where you're coming from.