whostosay

joined 2 years ago
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Likely. I guess I should clear up what I'm trying to get at, companies that large and monopolistic spend immense amount of resources doing everything they can to stifle competition because it's profitable to do so. They made the move knowingly approaching if not downright crossing the line, because their analysis showed them it would turn out to be profitable. Will we be fined? Probably not. If we do, can we afford it and still turn a profit?

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I missed. Meant to be aimed at your first comment up there

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Companies don't do shit that costs them money for no reason.

There are only two reasons a for profit company would do something, for profit or because the law is making them.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Someone didn't find this funny, but I did, well done

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

The least admirable quality someone can have "I'm never wrong"

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Honestly I hope so. Imagine those tickets going up, you thinking "oh fyre festival, what's that? That sounds fun" then looking it up, then buying tickets.

Anyone that wants to go be around that deserves to get got. Zero sympathy.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not to mention other bush fucking armed and propped them up before it getting out of control because even then we couldn't mind our fucking business.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Godamnit those are all 6 of my lucky numbers

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Although I still feel like you're being overly dismissive, let's talk about this case in particular, it remains unexplained, and it does have an obvious anomaly in it.

https://youtu.be/tf1uLwUTDA0

Nothing we have or have publicly released info on matches the behavior of this object, that goes for any nation.

People have tried to explain it away with parallax and the IR sensor itself rotating, but those don't hold up to scrutiny.

It really doesn't matter how you look at this subject it's interesting no matter the explanation, it's got government transparency issues, possible/probable misspending issues, it's a psyop, we've dropped the ball on technology/we have the tech, people up to thousands at a time are having mass hallucinations. To shrug it off as a couple of mistakes being made or a couple of people being crazy is irresponsible imo.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm not going to touch the aliens part of that because that would require more data than exists publically, at least right now.

I will talk about UFOs/UAP though, because there are quite a bit of data points on that.

This is a historical record and culmination of what our different government agencies had to turn over by law:

https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps

Which was a product of

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/118th-congress/senate-amendment/797/text

And that is only what the US has been able to bring forth so far legally against the will of the DoD.

France has a pretty public office/project as well.

https://thedebrief.org/the-new-director-of-geipan-frances-official-uap-investigative-office-discusses-science-and-the-study-of-aerial-mysteries/

So does Japan.

https://thedebrief.org/japan-launches-uap-investigation-following-u-s-report-identifying-region-as-hotspot-for-sightings/

There are serious people working on this, and it's not from word of mouth, dismissing it that way tells me you've refused to look at the data yourself.

This subject is an absolutely dumpster fire filled with misinfo and disinfo, but there is still solid data.

view more: next ›