I find this kind of response insufferable. It shifts the conversation from a systems critique to personal responsibility. You could have posted this in response the OP, and it would be equally on point and useless.
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
I have personalized ads turned of in YouTube and it seems half the ads are for gambling as of late.
Reminds me of something Alok said about playbooks: we focus on the books but forget to play.
I mean ICE is both a joke and a scary brute squad.
And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?
I don't think they want that smoke, better to let your competitor hurt themselves
How dare you have a healthy response to this garbage
No, but Milo threatened his friends to not defend him less they be a target of a harassment campaign.
The empire is falling, the question is whether it should be a controlled demolition
And Angie Nixon being the anti-Nixon
That's a distinction without a difference. The machine doing the inference is not the same machine doing the learning. From the perspective of the machine doing LLM inference, it could not tell you if the table was hand rolled by a human, fitted using ML or just a table of random noise.
Because the alternative to saving money with AI is providing better services with AI - if it can be done. And the people to do that are the people doing the job.