zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 5 months ago

The new talking point is that man made climate change is real but burning oil isn't causing the world to warm. But that does mean we can geoengineer our climate to be cooler. πŸ™ƒ

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you think critics of wokeness are wrong, then show why. Don’t just insult them and pretend that counts as insight.

Why would someone take the time to explain something to someone arguing in bad faith? Sounds like a foolish endeavor.

I'll leave you with the words from OP elsewhere in this thread because it equally applies to you:

Thanks, but I didn’t ask that and your assertion is based on your own bias/opinion

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yes I had an inflammatory response. I honestly don't perceive OP as making a good faith argument when they say "negative effects of wokeness". It's a thought terminating cliche.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Okay then, swap out AI with wokeness, it still doesn't come to the level of a "worldview". It is still an observation.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

everyone who disagrees with my worldview is a bot

I hardly consider my opinion on AI a "worldview". It is an observation that generative AI use in decision making and creativity reduces cognitive activity. Yes I asked OP to disprove me in an "ad-hominem" manner though. I guess we violently agree on that?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

Not really... AI bots are bad at providing value because they have no values and don't understand context. You can deliver a scathing reproach that has value as long as it fits the context and reflects your values. But do you consider your response an ad-hominem?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You are right in that I never answered the question asked. However, I would not say the conversation is a nonstarter, I asked you a question and you answered it well. That sounds like a discussion to me...

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

You never replied to the question in the post.

I think you might be hallucinating.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 5 months ago

Seriously. Men are perceived as dangerous by default and that influences how we think about solving problems.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

What is your intention with this response? Do you expect me to suddenly give you something you value as a response? That would be silly based on the conversation this far.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How is your response any different than what you are complaining about?

Edit: this is rhetorical, I am actually not interested in a response. Oh the irony.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

I'm not even from the Lemmy world instance. I'm from the instance that specifically rails against AI slop. Thank you for being silly.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί