this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
280 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

22881 readers
672 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Fuck them for changing corporate policy to what you want it to be?

They deserved hate for their anti-lgbt policies, but if they scrapped that there's no reason for hate anymore.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

You can still hate someone who eventually, under great pressure, finally decided to stop hurting people after having a history of hurting people when they should have known better.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

Damages demand restitution. I'll be chill with chik fil a when they commit to undoing the damage they've caused. "Sorry, we won't do it again" isn't acceptable, especially when their owner, Dan Cathy, continues to fund many of the same groups that chik fil a supposedly stopped funding in response to public pressure.

[–] smeg@infosec.pub 4 points 10 months ago

The family who owns most of the shares, and who were the authors of the anti-lgbt donations policies, vowed to replace the company's direct contributions with their own contributions sourced via the company's profits and dividends.

It moved who does the direct donation, but buying from Chick-fil-A still funds anti-lgbt efforts.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they still sell cut open babies to be eaten, matching their name

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, no. They're not using baby chickens as a source of meat.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They absolutely are. Same with cows.

How old do you think these animals live until when they're not murdered?

They're all children when they are sent to the slaughter houses.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They're not using chicks for Chick-fil-A nuggets. McDonald's, maybe, but not Chick-fil-A.

The culled males from the egg industry are typically used for animal feed.

Chick-fil-A uses broilers (6-9 weeks old) which is during their teenage stage. Animal maturity stages don't follow the same relative timeline as humans.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

9 weeks is a fucking baby. Chickens live long, healthy lives for years

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 10 months ago

Again, you can't judge animal maturity levels by comparing them to humans.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

too little too late