this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
340 points (97.8% liked)

World News

51798 readers
2969 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

European NATO leaders have issued a joint statement that "Greenland belongs to its people" and it is for the Arctic island and Denmark only to decide on its future, after President Donald Trump's administration reiterated its wish to take control of it.

The statement said that NATO and its allies had increased its activities and investment to make the Arctic a safe place and that Denmark and Greenland were part of that alliance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

An attack on one of us is an attack on us all.

Regardless of the outcome for us Europeans, good or bad, the USA invading a NATO nation will mean war. Hopefully a phoney war that's resolved quickly, but regardless, war. Period.

The question is, are they willing to burn every single alliance and friendship they have, and start a literal third world war, just to annex Greenland?

And for what reason? If they wanted more military presence there (they already have some, don't forget) they could just ask, Denmark is their friend and ally (not that the USA remembers this or cares about alliances any more), and would be open to discussing the details and sorting things out.

It seems like the actions of a deranged madman, not the calculated moves of an intelligent, purposeful world power.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have a feeling that EU contries would act with as much resolve as was done with Ukraine. So if Greenlanders can't fight by themselves for a couple years, other EU nations will have no one to donate helmets to.

They would also be more hesitant to make Trump mad than they were ever afraid of upseting Putin.

No one has an apetite for war. Even when it is necessary for your future security. Only dictators are fine with war.

[–] myserverisdown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You can't make a comparison to Ukraine and the Russian invasion. Ukraine isn't a NATO member nation, whereas Denmark is.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Greenlanders can't fight the US. They number less than 60,000 souls, a third of those in a single city. Of those willing and able to fight, they're armed with shotguns and hunting rifles. Worst of all, you can't fight a guerilla war in the Artic, even deserts are more human friendly. They'd have to magically transform into snow Freman to keep up a fight.

The EU's choice to stand back on the Ukraine war is exactly what will embolden Trump's handlers to take Greenland.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The EU can barely fight the US. Do they want to get into a costly war with the US over Greenland? That's it. That's literally the only way the heads of government think, in dollar signs. Is the cost of going to war with the US worth more or less than Greenland.

Russia, the US, and China are all making their moves to define the world for the coming century. World War 2 ended 80+ years ago. It's unfortunately natural for humans to want to fuck shit up again.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I've made 100 comments, but here's another:

As global warming advances, Greenland becomes prime real estate. Prospecting and mining will become easy and practical and year-round Artic shipping lanes will open. Not to mention it's a great place from which to project naval and air power.