I'll believe they mean it when the US military base in Greenland is evicted.
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
291 points (98.0% liked)
World News
51754 readers
2923 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The orange felon/rapist doesn't care a wit about sternly worded letters.
The orange rapist also doesn't care about someone saying "no".
Greenland is a legal property of NATO member Denmark. Experts are saying a forceful annexation or invasion there would collapse the alliance and end NATO. You know, the major thorn in Trump's handler Vladimir Putin's side? The check against invading smaller countries, and the alliance he's been railing against for years...? And the only thing that's stopping him from increased aggression against other countries near him? This shit's so obvious and out in the open. There's no consequences, so they don't even have to hide it anymore...
So, it doesn't change your point, but "legal property" isn't really the right word for an entity that makes up it's own laws and can ignore the laws of everywhere else. I'd stick with "territory", because it's about their local monopoly on the use of force, and mutual recognition by other sovereign powers.
If us troops invade Denmark. I will actively root for the murder of us troops by the people of Denmark. As an American, make an example of us
It makes me sick to think about the US invading Greenland, and Canada is literally unthinkable. But if you believe for a second the US will be made an example of, I'm sorry but you're just mistaken. As much vitriole as we might have toward the current leadership, the US is very strong and very capable, and the rest of the world knows that, and I'm not sure anyone wants to bear the cost of going to war with the US. They'll have to decide if the cost of losing a Greenland, for example, is greater or less than the cost of a potential war with the US. And realistically, it's less. Which is concerning.
Problem with that is, bullies never stop. Just like Russia, and Hitler before him, you give Trump what he wants when he bullies you and he will just take more.
The cost will be greater. Next he will demand Iceland. Then Portugal. Then pootin attacks Poland. When do you fight back? When no one's left but you?
finger twitching over the little foam hand that says "Death to America"
Don't make me do it, I'm warning you.
make an example of us
Troops aren't the ones making the decision to invade
A joint statement is great, but it's still words. I fear Trump and Putin aren't taking the EU very seriously because we're mostly words.
These words would carry a lot more weight if people believed Europe would back them up. And the most obvious way to do that, would be to liberate Ukraine. A Europe that liberated Ukraine from Russian occupation is more easy to believe when they say they will defend Greenland as well.
The issue here is to dissuade the US and Russia from even trying.
Well moving EU troops into Ukraine would rapidly cause Russia to go to war with the EU, and in short order, US would be forced to make a decision as part of NATO.
Unfortunately I suspect the US would use the moment to backstab the EU, abandon them, and attack Canada, Greenland and Mexico, since no one could come to their defense.
We need an alliance with China.
Russia is struggling with Ukraine. They cannot deal with the EU. Even without the US.
Biggest problem here is that the US may actually just try back out of NATO (in action rather than treaty) and basically abandon Ukraine and straight up back Russia.
Though with Venezuela and now the threats on Greenland, it will be hard for us (the US) to claim that we have no appetite for war. Which has been the biggest excuse to ignore our allies.
More specifically, Russia can't deal with a united EU. They might be able to deal with us one at a time, and we have a tendency to be divided. If there was ever a time we need to set aside our differences and recognise that we need to act together and decisively, it is now.
And we need to wrap up Putin's crappy war in a way that keeps Ukraine strong and on our side, so we will be stronger, and we can be prepared to deal with the US if Trump goes for Greenland.
Did you read the US national security policy they just released? Have you been listening to everyone over the last few days? They make it very clear they intend to secure the Western hemisphere because they think it belongs to them. Your country thinks my country belongs to you. Trump is very likely going to move on Greenland, and once the pretense is gone I imagine he would do exactly what he claims to want to do, in formal policies and all over the media.
I don't know why Americans seem to think "oh he's just joking this time". A rule of thumb: If it involves making people's lives worse, he's not joking. He wants to control the Western hemisphere and if he has to kill millions to do it, he will.
You're in denial if you don't think Trump is going to drive the world to war. Or maybe you happen to believe that my country does in fact belong to the US?
I agree with every bit of that except ascribing these actions to Trump's wants and vision. He would be perfectly happy getting fatter, holding rallies and grifting from the Oval Office. These actions are put into his head by handlers such as Miller, who's the most visible.
Trump is the perfect tool, a malignant narcissist fallen to dementia. He's easier to control than a toddler. All they have to do is keep him off camera on his bad days and let him have his way with meaningless stuff like renaming the Kennedy Center.
tl;dr: Trump is in control of very little. While we point fingers at him, the real powers behind the throne are moving fast and mostly undercover.
I'm American and I didn't think he was joking during his first term and this term I fully expect that in a month the US will take Greenland, I don't know anyone who thinks Trump is just a Lil goofy guy making goofy jokes.
No prediction on when the US takes Greenland, but it's happening as soon as the administration feels they have Venezuela under control. They're not repeating Hitler's mistake of not driving for the Russian oil fields before opening more fronts.
I didn’t say he wouldn’t drive the world to war. I am just saying it is complicated and alliances aren’t going to be easily identified.
Trump and them are pieces of shit and they are doing exactly what I expected when they were elected. I voted for Kamala.
Rhetoric and actions are going to be very different and you can’t trust anything they say. Just what they do.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Defending a country's territorial integrity is not defiant; if anything, the country threatening that integrity is the one acting in a reckless, defiant, and dangerous manner.
Defiant in the face of a would-be oppressor
Yeah that choice of words didn't sit right with me either.
An attack on one of us is an attack on us all.
Regardless of the outcome for us Europeans, good or bad, the USA invading a NATO nation will mean war. Hopefully a phoney war that's resolved quickly, but regardless, war. Period.
The question is, are they willing to burn every single alliance and friendship they have, and start a literal third world war, just to annex Greenland?
And for what reason? If they wanted more military presence there (they already have some, don't forget) they could just ask, Denmark is their friend and ally (not that the USA remembers this or cares about alliances any more), and would be open to discussing the details and sorting things out.
It seems like the actions of a deranged madman, not the calculated moves of an intelligent, purposeful world power.
I've made 100 comments, but here's another:
As global warming advances, Greenland becomes prime real estate. Prospecting and mining will become easy and practical and year-round Artic shipping lanes will open. Not to mention it's a great place from which to project naval and air power.
I have a feeling that EU contries would act with as much resolve as was done with Ukraine. So if Greenlanders can't fight by themselves for a couple years, other EU nations will have no one to donate helmets to.
They would also be more hesitant to make Trump mad than they were ever afraid of upseting Putin.
No one has an apetite for war. Even when it is necessary for your future security. Only dictators are fine with war.
Greenlanders can't fight the US. They number less than 60,000 souls, a third of those in a single city. Of those willing and able to fight, they're armed with shotguns and hunting rifles. Worst of all, you can't fight a guerilla war in the Artic, even deserts are more human friendly. They'd have to magically transform into snow Freman to keep up a fight.
The EU's choice to stand back on the Ukraine war is exactly what will embolden Trump's handlers to take Greenland.
The EU can barely fight the US. Do they want to get into a costly war with the US over Greenland? That's it. That's literally the only way the heads of government think, in dollar signs. Is the cost of going to war with the US worth more or less than Greenland.
Russia, the US, and China are all making their moves to define the world for the coming century. World War 2 ended 80+ years ago. It's unfortunately natural for humans to want to fuck shit up again.
You can't make a comparison to Ukraine and the Russian invasion. Ukraine isn't a NATO member nation, whereas Denmark is.
Strongly worded letter. We know this is not what Trump and his ilk respond to. They're going to have to find some form of material leverage, if they have any, to strengthen the argument.
That's not so hard. Ban silicon valley social networks. Put a heavy tax on any digital goods and services with a headquarter in the USA. Trump is very sensitive to those. Then move on to put tariffs on physical goods. Cancel orders of USA military products. That's a good beginning.
Commented yesterday that America may someday build an Iron Curtain across the Atlantic, but you got me thinking Europe should lead the charge on that.
Expel all Americans, close all embassies, shut down American social media, cut all American imports, do it now. Our Homeland Security Advisor was on TV two nights ago saying, "We're taking Greenland, it's ours, nothing anybody is going to do about it." What more impetus does Europe require to act now?!
Why aren't they doing these things already? Because Trump has made a deal with the devil so nobody imposes consequences on him for anything ever
Could start there based on the threats alone.
Suprised to see Meloni along them
More surprised at starmer being there honestly
load more comments
(6 replies)
Came across this clear reason why the child rapist has set his eyes on Greenland and no media is talking about: He wants Greenlands precious metal since they designed their gate keeping primary military spearhead (F35) with one little flaw: it needs a rare metal only widely available in China... https://youtu.be/ng4cwPNIag0
Only problem with that theory, is that USA is pretty much welcome to mine whatever the fuck they want in Greenland. Neither Denmark nor Greenland is stopping them.
Bingo! And I've commented many times that global warming makes mining and prospecting easier, and year-round Artic shipping lanes will soon be a thing.
Costs so sunk that you need to invade a sovereign nation
load more comments
(1 replies)
The dude is really asking to get got; lives in a country with millions of guns and talks like the SS hasn't fucked up before.
At this point, his security is no doubt up there with Putin's. Also, he needs extra guarding on his bad dementia days. Watch him wander off from Japan's Prime Minister. His mind is gone and he is under near absolute control.
Where is von der layen ?
view more: next ›