this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
1326 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

79674 readers
3941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 288 points 1 day ago (19 children)

I've yet to see any negative headlines about Mamdani ever since hr won election, aside from him opposing primarying Chuck Schumer for some stupid fucking reason.

Seeing the tankies talk about him on .ml would make you think he was leading the 4the Reich. Notice how the proletariat tends to win when we don't engage in puritanical politics based off of red fascism.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Notice how the proletariat tends to win when we don't engage in puritanical politics based off of red fascism.

I disagree. This just comes off as a half-truth. Mamdani actually is far and away the most pure candidate apart from Bernie Sanders in the whole of US politics.

what according to you is "puritanical politics based off of red facism"?

The people want inclusivity, better welfare for the working class people, better overall healthcare, debt-burden free education and we don't want a government that's corporate leaning, takes money from foreign interests, arrests citizens for no explainable reason, fucks up the planet for the profits of a few. We don't want governments that support genocide, slavery or other atrocities at home or abroad.

Which part of this is "red facism"?

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 53 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I've seen one today: "Mamdani admits massive NYC deficit! Proof socialism doesn't work!". Dude, he wasn't mayor a month ago, pretty sure socialism isn't the problem here...

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

Not the first time I read that kind of BS. In Cadiz (Spain), a left wing major said 1 month after being appointed that the previous right wing major left nothing but spider webs in the accounts. The right wing tried to push that as "only a month and he has broken the city".

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Is that a real headline? If so, that's extremely dishonest journalism...

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 hours ago

Conservatives don't care about truth or internal consistency. They just want to harm the out-group.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

IIRC It was newsmaxx or some other propaganda outlet.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

The overly rich own most large news outlets so it‘s not surprising.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 68 points 23 hours ago (27 children)

Tankies don't like objective reality.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 135 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

They don't like electoralism, prefer to LARP revolution while doing nothing to actually lay the groundwork for one.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 102 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Which is sort of wild.

Marx was very clear that communism could not be delivered by heroes on horseback. But then again, Tankies don't like Marx, they like Lenin, the man who lost an election to actual communists and then had them all killed. He seized power via coup, and then made himself a king, and wrote how kings (vanguard parties) were somehow vital to communism, and how democracy was not.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"If your last name ends in 'in', it's time to get out."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 55 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Tankies are chicken-hawks.

They gladly let millions of marginalized peoples suffer and die for a pipedream that those people will fight a communist revolution... on the tankies' behalf.

Tankies won't ever be the ones on the front line. They spam fuck comment sections and try to convince as many people as possible to act against their own self interests, to put them in a desperate enough state that the tankoes can more easily manipulate them.

Tankies aren't communists, they're red fascists. Same abuser mentality as the fascists they so gleefully surrendered to in November 2024.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 27 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Tankies don't like anyone, they'll never be satisfied. I'm fairly certain most of them are russian trolls tasked with sowing discord and fracturing the left.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Excuse me, we're Chinese trolls, thanks very much; we are unhealthily obsessed with China because it's incredibly economically successful, it's the last hope of actual oldschool dictatorship of the worker socialism, and it's barely avoided being controlled by the market.

It's incredibly centralised, it's authoritarian, yes, but it's also building all the solar panels and executing billionaires when they get too powerful and making the imperial nations look like chumps, so you should forgive us for our infatuation.

My lack of action and lack of building local organisation? Guilty. I'm trying to correct this. China is not the model for the West, and even the Chinese govt says that, so as a true Chinahead I do not call for Chad Xi to come save us, that is missing the fucking point. We must grow our own socialist organisations to bypass the state, and anarchists and syndicalists might be the best idea for the West, with our individualism and love of freedom.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 hours ago

I honestly can't tell if you're being facetious or not...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 46 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

One thing I've learned as a socialist is that there is always a purity test by people who consider themselves purer socialists.

Karl Marx himself could post on here and people would accuse him of being a neoliberal stooge.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

but be very careful of labelling people puritanical. Everybody draws lines that when crossed make the other person untrustworthy. This should be encouraged for a healthy democracy.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 13 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

I just headed over to .ml and did a local search for "mamdani"

I see a bunch of the more conservatives Democrats and their supporters complaining about him and conservatives of all stripes are really hoping he'll fail.

I've been called a tankie several times and I rather like Mamdani. I see him, AOC, and Sanders as the best hope for the future of the US.

Where are these tankies that hate Mamdani so much? What do they hate him for?

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They don't.

There's two main criticisms of Zohran that come from the left.

One is that while good, his victory is going to be limited because the mayor has little power to enact systematic change. The keeping of Tisch (likely to avoid a war with Hochul he can't win) is a point for this

The second is that it reinforces the Democratic party which actively opposes socialism, by giving it a face of that. And that in that way it also serves to dilute actual revolutionary energy, etc.

You don't have to agree with those arguments - I don't fully. But those are them. But considering the person here is hitting a shitlib trifecta - screaming about tankies and horseshoe theory, conspiracy theories about Russian bots, and claiming "nuance" when caught in obvious contradictions - theyre not going to make an actual argument. Just claim ownership of the left for the center, again.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago

Oooh, I'd love to see what stupid shit they are complaining about.

"Oh no! We are going to have healthcare again! Stop him!"

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Where are these tankies that hate Mamdani so much? What do they hate him for?

I have seen a few, here is one I saved from some time back.

https://lemmy.ml/post/39249375

A lot of things get removed from .ml so its hard to go back find things sometimes. If you are around lemmy a while you will find quite a few takes from tankies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Authoritarian-Communist.

Named after the mostly Marxist-Leninist leftists who supported the Soviets brutality in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, when they sent into tanks to kill the student democratic uprising.

Used by non-auth leftists for decades, past few years some centrists and rightists have started using it for anything left that they don't like as calling everyone communists wasn't working any more. These days it generally means anyone who supports China, Russia, blames Ukraine, etc.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The irony of the use in respect to Ukraine is that they're calling anyone not wanting to send tanks a tankie.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not ironic, because they're not calling for the tanks to crush innocent people but to stop imperialist invaders.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As long as someone else gets drafted to die in the trenches, right?

You're either disingenuous or beyond naive about ethnic and nationalistic conflict.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

How about Russia doesn't invade Ukraine and no one has to get fucking drafted.

Tankies love imperialism, it's sickening how willing you are to throw innocent lives away.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not a tankie, my little chickenhawk. Just an actual communist who understands "no war but class war". But I guess cheering on more troops into the grinder seems fine to you from far away.

Živio Tito, smrt fašizmu, sloboda narodu, i jebem ti majku.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Good than you understand lending critical support to the people of Ukraine in their valiant struggle against Russian imperialism.

It’s laughable how some people say Ukraine should not be defended, but never say Russia should stop invading.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're not giving critical support to the people. You're giving it to the government.

You want to go support that war, they're looking for volunteers, my little chickenhawk. Why don't you go relieve a conscript, since you think the struggle is so important?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 18 minutes ago

Such a tankie.

Tell me genius, what would happen to the people if they do not resist Russia? A country who is literally engaged in genocide against them.

You do not give a shit about the people of Ukraine, you are a reactionary chud who would see them die rather than support them fighting because America bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 23 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (10 children)

Yeah, I’m also liking Mamdani. However, I may be traumatized because I don’t completely trust the situation. What did Mamdani tell Trump to make Trump support him so quickly? Trump did a 180 over night, and I want to know how Mamdani did that…

Edit: I get that Trump is impressionable, fickle, and a boy of truly weak resolve. Yet, I still want to know what Mamdani did… not what we took advantage of. What was said?

[–] scintilla@piefed.zip 59 points 23 hours ago

trump will literally agree with anyone he spends an hour talking to. He said he and walz had similar thoughts on what to do in ministota.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 43 points 22 hours ago

Trump is barking seal that agrees with any man that is in the same room as him.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is ridiculously easy to manipulate. Just use the right words and butter him up and he'll think you're his buddy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)