this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

80724 readers
3748 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

It's all about profits and psying major labels even.more

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Even the Spotify shuffle feature is built to maximize profits and to hell with the user experience.

I have almost 2 thousand songs on one playlist and Spotify plays the songs from minor artists (who don't get paid much) constantly, while songs from major artists (who get paid a lot more) are never played. I'm actually surprised to hear those songs when shuffle is turned off.

They've also recently added "Video Episodes for You" to my home screen with no way to turn it off. It takes up 1/3 of the screen with helpful titles like "Session 105, Hillory Duff", and "Reinvent Life from Rock Bottom and Become Unrecognizable." I have never watched a video or listened to a podcast on Spotify.

When it comes to enshittification Spotify's got it down.

Maybe someday one of the other music services will create something like Spotify Connect.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

tidal.com

Lacks a few of Spotify's features, but the audio quality is great, and it's cheaper. Plus, fuck Spotify.

Qobuz is also good, apparently.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 minutes ago

I looked at a tital a year or so ago and it wouldn't work for me. Will look again, maybe they've improved it.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

seconding Tidal.

but also feeling like buying more physical media going forward.

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 1 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

For me it was the opposite: Every "made for you" mix and playlist is fairly popular songs from artists that I like... But they are always the same few dozen songs, just shuffled in different order.

Video suggestions seem to appear if/after you listen to podcasts or audiobooks. I had them, my partner did not.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

My "Made for You" has occasional popular artists but most of the songs are from people who are relatively unknown. The only way I listened to a podcast is if I clicked on one by accident.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think it's more about closing a backdoor to free product that was generally out of reach for most people a few years. Free API access for devs has been a thing forever for the most part, but the barriers are now lower for people to abuse it.

Yes about profits in the sense they don't want people getting free access to content, but I don't think this is designed to net them a bunch of money or anything.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Agreed. To me, this sounds like a continuation of the abolition of Web 2.0, the era where APIs were open and nobody was talking about how they'd pay for it.