This is going to become more of a standard due to people vibecoding their own clients for every dumb thing.
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
35 points (97.3% liked)
Technology
80724 readers
3728 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's all about profits and psying major labels even.more
Even the Spotify shuffle feature is built to maximize profits and to hell with the user experience.
I have almost 2 thousand songs on one playlist and Spotify plays the songs from minor artists (who don't get paid much) constantly, while songs from major artists (who get paid a lot more) are never played. I'm actually surprised to hear those songs when shuffle is turned off.
They've also recently added "Video Episodes for You" to my home screen with no way to turn it off. It takes up 1/3 of the screen with helpful titles like "Session 105, Hillory Duff", and "Reinvent Life from Rock Bottom and Become Unrecognizable." I have never watched a video or listened to a podcast on Spotify.
When it comes to enshittification Spotify's got it down.
Maybe someday one of the other musics service will create something like Spotify Connect.
tidal.com
Lacks a few of Spotify's features, but the audio quality is great, and it's cheaper. Plus, fuck Spotify.
Qobuz is also good, apparently.
seconding Tidal.
but also feeling like buying more physical media going forward.
I think it's more about closing a backdoor to free product that was generally out of reach for most people a few years. Free API access for devs has been a thing forever for the most part, but the barriers are now lower for people to abuse it.
Yes about profits in the sense they don't want people getting free access to content, but I don't think this is designed to net them a bunch of money or anything.
Agreed. To me, this sounds like a continuation of the abolition of Web 2.0, the era where APIs were open and nobody was talking about how they'd pay for it.
I think this will be a problem for Spotiflac