this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
231 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

20501 readers
531 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 96 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Their baby was born in an American hospital seven weeks early, but the couple said Zurich Insurance Group refused to uphold the policy and cover their costs because the baby was not named in the document.

After a nine month legal battle, Zurich has reversed its decision and told the BBC it was sorry for the stress caused.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 hours ago

The unborn child that isn't allowed to have a name yet needs to be named in the document.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 59 points 3 hours ago

The legal proceedings had more time to mature than the baby lol