Australia

Normally Conversation articles link to the study in question, but this one hasn't been published (yet). Not sure why the editor(s) didn't just wait for that first. I agree that it's lacking detail/context and feels a bit incendiary without it.

Like come on let me see the data.

It's probably paywalled eh.

Our research: In our recent national survey of Australian adults and adolescents, we examined general misogynistic attitudes and support for violent extremism.

Not sure if this is what they’re referring but am also curious how this survey was conducted.

For example the question “do you believe women lie about DV/SV”. As someone who had a parent lie about related matters, I could answer yes, but is that what the question is actually asking? It seems to be asking if women, in general, lie about them. Obviously, no they don’t, but you can see how a question especially when posed to teenagers may lead to responses easily sensationalised by a news outlet. The inverse of this questions seems to be “do you believe women never lie about DV/SV?”

There’s a reason self reported surveys are a nightmares for academics to use for meaningful data. Worth pointing the rest of the article has a lot of valid and concerning material that isn’t somehow magically undone by the articles research methods.