this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
51 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55456 readers
3022 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

April 13, 2026

https://archive.ph/HEZna

On Sunday, it happened: Viktor Orban was defeated. In an election with the highest voter turnout in Hungarys democratic history, Peter Magyar’s Tisza Party won a two-thirds supermajority, enough to alter the constitution that Orban had rewritten to shore up his power.

Some admirers of Orban have argued that the fact that he lost proves he was never an autocrat to begin with. What it really demonstrates, however, is that opposition to Fidesz was so strong it was able to overwhelm all the structures Orban put in place to protect his rule: wildly distorted voting districts, a captured media, state-sponsored propaganda, local patronage networks, and widespread threats and intimidation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com -3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Why is my bullshit meter going off? All I'm hearing is about how Orban is bad, which I agree with. But I hear nothing of the other guy, and it's making me think to the Yevgeny Prigozhin death, who IMHO, was an even worse option than Putin.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

But I hear nothing of the other guy

If you read the article, you would hear some things about the other guy. Half the article was about him.

To recap:

  • center-right instead of authoritarian-right

  • European/NATO/EU-aligned instead of Russian-aligned

  • Still anti-immigrant

  • Probably not pro-LGBT+, but seems to be a lot less anti-LGBT+ than Orban -- Doesn't show up for Pride events, but also doesn't demonize LGBT+ people in every speech like Orban did.

  • No ties to Israel or Russia.

  • Promises to prosecute members of the Orban regime who enriched themselves at taxpayer expense.

A mixed bag, certainly. Could be better ... but could also be worse. The important thing is that he'll -- hopefully -- restore fair democracy in the country, undoing Orban's corruption of the election process and giving others a fair chance at winning in the next election. So, hopefully, the next election could bring in somebody even better.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're right on all fronts about me, but in my defense, I've given up on the War Crimes Times. So I take it that's it's a bad, which is better than worse? And Orban supporters think that he lost because Orban wasn't bad/authoritarian enough?

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

He’s not perfect, but perfect is the enemy of good. Sometimes a small w is all you’re going to get.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Which is what my initial question was. Is he actually "good" or is just "Not Orban"?

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

Not being Orban with different ideas on key points is certainly a big part of it. He does have political experience, says he wants to tackle corruption, is more pro-EU and perhaps Ukraine as well

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Everything I read about him, to me, reads as a controlled opposition / "alternative" and things will mostly be business as usual for him, with the caveat that his party is staunchly anti-government corruption, although I have seen anti-corruption gut perfectly good government offices and programs (looking at you DOGE and MUSKYBOI)

I don't share the elation of everyone else, but I am also not Hungarian, my hopes and thoughts are with them.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 46 minutes ago

Yeah, that's kinda my fear. That whomever comes after him, will not just be worse than him, but also worse than Orban. And it's simply because the new guy won't change a damn thing. But again, not a Hungarian, just speaking as someone in USA, that there was no change during Obama, and I expect the person after Trump will be a milquetoast/corporate Democrat, and it will lead to someone worse than Trump.