Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Both are correct. I don't see the Fediverse ever becoming as large as the billionaire platform for the precise reason that it isn't run by billionaires with gigantic advertising budgets. As such, the Fediverse will not have the large numbers of users and hence, will be quieter.
That being said, the Fediverse IS an alternative to the billionaire platforms - especially for people who desire smaller, more intimate communities and - perhaps most importantly - controlled and governed by the people who use it.
as long as there are enough people and content here, why should we even care if everyone isnt here? I dont even want every idiot here.
Preach. I'm happy to only hang out with the sort of people who see the value in social media by the people and for the people. Sometimes it's messy, some of us are kinda annoying, but it's always going to be better than corpo shit.
This.
One of the reasons that billionaire controlled tech platforms become so mainstream IS their ability to grow and spread, and eventually become de facto means of communication online.
This allows them to break out of the early adopter, technical space and spread to a wider audience
I think we need to be okay with less users because the billionaire platforms use bots, anyways.
Let me rephrase then. What is there to protect the Fediverse from control?
it's a step in the right direction but still a small step and it took a lot of effort
I agree. I think fediverse is such an amazing step towards something great. But i don't want to drop this ball. I believe there's so many balls dropped over the past 20 years. I think we need to wake up
The Fediverse is decentralized, which means that it cannot (or at least it would be very, very difficult) be shut down by anyone. On an individual level, any user is free to start their own instance or community with their own rules in place should another instance or community become undesirable. If there is something you don't like or that is somehow stifling to you, start your own and make it the way you want it.
User unfriendlyness.
Visually, Fediverse isn't like reddit, instagram, or any other popular social media places.
You need to put in some effort to even browse it.
That anyone can run a node. I could put one in my basement.
Including billionaires or heritage foundation or Thiel. Also what would you do with this node? Significance matters right now. Numbers and engagement matters. The left have lost significance and engagement year over year. You can stand up a node but how does this safe guard our spaces from being over run?
I can defederate from those instances. Problem solved. So can you.
A lot of people really don't understand federation...
And I think it's because instances federate by default no matter what.
Like, there's one instance that is a single person who believes they have multiple personalities. They have open signups but then ban anyone that signs up as "impersonating admins".
.world federated with them, and even let them in the "admin only" matrix chat and let that person pretend to be a real admin who has real problems with actual users.
I legitimately don't know if they're aware, it's just they federate with literally anyone by default, and that's why they keep running into issues later.
But they exist still. My assumption here is it wasn't always a shit hole. That the shit hole occurs when a few poor features of digital spaces are exploited. Vote manipulations. Moderation capture. Linking posts and communities by accounts like Libs of TT who brigade. And once you de-federate, what stops them from jumping to any other instances you enjoy?
Keep mind that Trump's truth social is a Mastodon instance. But no one federates with it (by design; they never turned federation on on purpose). That doesn't mean that other mastodon instances are made worse because it's there.
So safe spaces for me, but not for thee?
You're saying that because assholes have their own space, that we can't?
Your point makes no sense. Do you understand federation and defederation? It's not a tool of censorship. It's literally the solution to the problem you're complaining about.
Not sure what you mean here. I'm saying it is potentially not censorship proof and that we should be aware of that.
I really don't think you understand how this works.
If I start an instance, it is impossible for you to censor me, on my instance. Even if you were a billionaire. I cannot censor you on other federated sites, but I can defederate from a site which is run by billionaire assholes. They can have their space, and I can have mine and there doesn't need to be any cross pollution.
It is impossible to censor anyone within their own instance. But you can block instances.
This is not a single site. It is dozens, or hundreds, or thousands, or millions, and so on. In theory, every person on the planet could have their own instance and no one could censor them.
You're missing what I'm saying. What gives you're instance of anything any importance. Why are you not creating instances every day for yourself?
You're going to want to gravitate to instances that produce content. You can say you'll just defederate but what stops the highly motivated PR team whose job is to capture these instances from also targeting other instances you enjoy.
I don't know about your experience, but I've had this happen outside the fediverse. Many sites I enjoyed were slowly turned. There was ways to stop it. But people didn't take it seriously. I see the exact same attitudes here.
They are going to come to the fediverse and they're going to make it theirs if we don't figure out ways to prevent it. Spinning up new instances and defederation will not be enough. There needs to be systematic changes to how these sites work. They have to be anti capitalist and community first rather than moderation first.
As in, why would anyone sign up on my instance? Why would anyone come see my content?
Answer me this: Why would they have to sign up, or come to my instance, to see my content? If I'm not broadcasting objectionable shit, my instance will remain federated, so everyone will see posts from me and my instance on their preferred instance. And I'll see all their content, on my own instance.
The problem you're imagining is already solved. Even if a big popular instance gets bought, or taken over by fiat, defederation works as a solution; the content is posted by users, so there'll just be an explosion of content from a different instance as everyone moves.
What does one do with numbers and engagement on the Fediverse?
Share ideas. Build community. Raise awareness. You build hype.
With enough numbers and engagement you can resist the spread of the right and push back.
Why do you think people want it to have no control?
4chan exists, people would go there if they want a lawless wasteland. Or that weird 4chan ripoff that gets spammed every couple months here. Plebbit? They change the name constantly
And there's fringe instances where they claim to want that lawlessness, but look at their modlogs and they stamp out anyone who disagrees with them. So you can try an "anarchist" instance if hypocrisy is ok with you..
But your question is coming from a very unpopular perspective.
The vast amount of people want someone in control because otherwise it's just a bunch of trolls who don't have a choice if they use the big platforms, because they're IP banned from there.
Fediverse will always have a way for the dregs to get in, so having someone with "control" is necessary. Otherwise normal people leave....
I think some time in the future we're all going to wake up to the realization that the mods were the problem and a big part of why the right wing are growing while the left are dying out.
In the past couple decades the left has fumbled so hard they have completely destroyed themselves and their ideals with almost no sign of recovery for the next few decades.
No...
Because you can make an instance right now and be the admin with full control, and have it be the lawless wasteland you claim everyone wants.
You would fail just like all the others before you, because even if someone thinks they want that, they quickly realize they dont when they go somewhere like that.
This is bog standard low empathy thinking from the right.
You assume you're a "silent majority" and everyone thinks like you, because you lack the ability to put yourself in someone else's shoes
For fucks sake, voat is what you say people want, look into how even reddit maga enjoyed that once they finally found a place "free of moderation".
Spoiler:
When they realized they couldn't ban dissent and it wasn't a safe place, they left.
Which is my point a little bit. But you assume it fails because people don't want it. Leftist need to change to want it if they want to survive.
For fucks sake you're all suppose to be leftist and you can't even re-create a co-operative based approach to your digital space. But you're all going to say "we need to universalize X, Y or Z" but when it comes to your cat post we need a hierarchical system where ultimate control is given to a select few faceless individuals??
There is no future for the left if you rely on moderation. Moderation will inevitably become the tool of tech billionaires to control our digital spaces. Being able to stand up new instances is not a defense to protect these spaces against that. The left needs spaces to disseminate information. Spread ideas and build momentum. The only logical conclusion becomes that the minute it is popular enough to be useful then it will also be popular enough to for the right to target. If lemmy does not develop ways to guard against control by a select few faceless individuals then it will go the way of reddit if not worse. Without spaces to grow, then the right will continue their trend of capture people of all ages to their ideas and principals.
And those exist...
You want a space
One centralized location where everyone is, and no one is allowed to do any moderation.
That will never happen, because no one wants to hang out with a bunch of Nazis and bigots, and that is going to be the one group who will abso fucking lutely show up in droves to a social media website with zero moderation and a leftist lean.
If you legitimately still don't understand any of this, you're gonna have to ask someone else for more help.
What spaces are those?
That's it, basically. Even if someone bought up all instances and domainnames (which would require that server admins sell them, which i can't see many doing, or else they wouldn't run a fediverse service in the first place), there's nothing stopping you from creating a new instance outside of the control of this person the same day. It literally cannot be simply taken over by, say, Microsoft.
Right, and I'm thinking this is not actually a solid way to protect fediverse from what is happening everywhere else.
We can all create instances, but there needs to be engagement for it to matter. I'm not looking at this from the point of view of "what can I do to enjoy my time on the internet while my rights are taken away and I'm told my sister should go to jail for wanting an abortion"
There is a pattern that occurs with seizing digital spaces. It starts small. They begin dog whistling in small communities. Not enough to get banned. Just enough to get reactions. Based off the reaction they target a few of the weaker ones. Whistles get louder. They link those to their influencers who post to their base. That base begin to show up and the community begins to fracture. Mods get overwhelmed. Ask for help to increase mod team. Some of the new mod team are the very people poisoning the community or are affiliated. The new moderators make it worse. Users begin to block or leave the communities. More dog whistles. More growth from the right until the community is captured. They move on to target another bigger community and are now using the first community as a pool to feed into the bigger one and turn it. So you can de-federate but nothing really stops the attacks. There is no real mechanism right now to guard against what has happened as far as I see it.
If lemmy were to grow as big as other sites, it will be just as likely to swing hard right unless something else is done.
The "swing to the hard right" comes as soon as more normies arrive. There are basically two ways this goes:
a) badly behaved normies get the boot. comes with the side effect of keeping the cost for instance admins low and the work for mod teams small, but also means that we stay a niche. I have no issues with this.
b) normies come here and do as they always do. this is your scenario. Since normies - since they are normies - will simply swarm to single instances, as we saw at the API exodus, the rest of the fediverse will sooner or later defederate from those single instances if they aren't able to keep their normie horde in check. This is fine, actually. If i really want to look at something only the normies are talking about, i can simply fire up my normie-instance account and see all i want.
Since we have a simple mechanism of keeping badly behaved instances in check, i cannot see how your scenario actually comes to fruit.
Both a) and b) only works for so long. We're not talking just about users. We're talking about coordinated efforts by group's backed by financial support to slowly take over. I've seen them go so far as getting themselves onto mod teams. They have it down to a science mean if we're not making them rewrite their books constantly then lemmy is just going to go the way of all other platforms.
I do not agree to your premise that we can't do anything against your scenario. It's simply a matter of moderation or the lack thereof. Compromised Instances will sooner than later get defederated.
Best Example: lemmygrad.ml or lemmy.ml - those are the instances of the lemmy coders, which are hard auth-left, and even they got defederated by most of the fediverse, and piefed was created (besides other reasons) to get a codebase that isn't dependent on russia-apologists.
If you're wanting a planned in advance ideal solution, that's not really possible, but people can collectively respond to problems as they happen and adapt, as long as they aren't constrained from doing so.
I believe the pattern and tactics you describe are always going to be more effective on a platform controlled by a company like Reddit, because any efforts to counter them are ultimately limited by the agenda of the platform owners. There are people on Reddit trying to investigate and call out deceptive commercial spam, but when the spammers block them to prevent a response, set their post history to be unreadable, buy moderator positions, and admins only care about their own power and profitability (cutting users off from api etc), the deck is stacked against them. In the end it's just not their website.
Ultimately this is an organizational challenge, not only a technical or platform design challenge. If the organization is a collection of users who generally want genuine non-manipulative interaction between real people, and the protocol is set up to make it easy for them to route around malicious attempts to usurp control, that doesn't mean immediate victory over adversaries but it is a big leg up.
The decentralization is there, but in theory the owner of the largest node could defederate from everyone else, forcing users to leave the largest instance or put up with it? I genuinely don't know which direction users would go, lemmy users are an odd bunch.
nothing. it's at the mercy of the instance admins or those who host the instances.
if at some point they get bought up, or decide to collude, you won't have any options.
they are also subject to the national laws in which their servers reside.
people forget, reddit started as a server in someone's basement too in 2005. it was a start up, then it got purchased by conde nast in 2006, who started advertising it. i found reddit in 2007 as part of Wired's website feed.
reddit was niche until the mid 2010s, it became a top 10 website in 2017-2018, and now is 7th most popular site on the internet, just behind twitter/x.
Exactly. This was my thought. I remember early reddit. It was amazing and we all said the same shit Being able to upvote and downvote posts meant anything could be posted and the community moderated. Then it all shifted. Voting no longer mattered other than to be smug and say you don't agree. I look at lemmy and it seems like it took the moderator first approach. It took the worst parts of reddit.
If you don't understand the distinction between voting and federation, perhaps toy need to do some more reading?
Nothing I said implied this. We're all having a discussion here. I don't think this type of lazy statement helps anything.