Selfhosted

46621 readers

1551 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

307

Liquid Trees (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 hours ago by ECEC@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Nothing is wrong with trees, but the microalgae CO2 capture rate is 50x higher````` .

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Their lifetime is also much shorter. Guess where all that CO2 goes, when they die ^^

[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I have a solution. More algae.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 40 minutes ago

This is the solution. You drain it and sequester the carbon.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Based and algae-pilled

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Fake and algae

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Fertilizer

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm gonna bet that you're going to get a much-more-economical return there by powdering whatever iron is used in building that thing and then dumping said iron powder into the ocean at an appropriate point.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 35 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

This technique is controversial because there is limited understanding of its complete effects on the marine ecosystem,[5] including side effects and possibly large deviations from expected behavior. Such effects potentially include release of nitrogen oxides,[6] and disruption of the ocean's nutrient balance.[1] Controversy remains over the effectiveness of atmospheric CO2 sequestration and ecological effects.

Geoengineering is bullshit proposed by funding from fossil fuel companies so they can continue to pollute.

The solution is simple: make it illegal to pollute. Fine the companies responsible for their past contributions to the climate catastrophe out of existence.