this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
200 points (97.2% liked)

politics

23406 readers
2786 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 125 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

We don't need their Cars, we don't need their Energy, we don't need their Lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have, other than their friendship, which hopefully we will always maintain," Trump wrote.

Hey, Canada, seriously, you should just halt all exports to the US at the border if that’s his position. Call our bluff. Help our imbecilic government and my deeply idiotic countrymen Find Out. I am being extremely serious.

Edit: jesus fucking christ. From the NYT briefing on their meeting, as it is happening right fucking now:

President Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada praised each other in the Oval Office during the first meeting between the two leaders since Mr. Carney won a stunning election on an anti-Trump platform. Mr. Trump struck a conciliatory tone, saying he had “a lot of respect” for Mr. Carney, who praised the president for his “relentless focus on the American worker.” But after Mr. Trump talked about his calls for Canada to be the 51st state, Mr. Carney said “some places are not for sale.” Mr. Trump did not concede: “Never say never.”

Fuck my entire life, I hate this timeline so much

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We literally need their energy...

They can flip a switch and large parts of northern US loses power, and it's not like we can just flip the switch back, because the switch is in Canada.

Fucking flip it, stop normalizing trump and start treating him like he treats people, he'd have flipped the switch and broken it off already if the situation was reversed.

I say this as an American; other countries need to stop protecting us from our bad decisions or as a country we'll keep making bad decisions. There has to be consequences

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don't think Canada wants to hurt so many innocent people because Trump runs his mouth.

Cutting electricity doesn't only mean it's stopping kids from playing Fortnite or something. It also means cutting it from infrastructure, hospitals, hospices and many other healthcare facilities, water pumping and treatment, traffic control and so on. Trump won't suffer because any of that happening, random people will.

Sure some people may have voted for Trump but a whole lot didn't. They don't deserve that.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Also depending on where in the north it is, perhaps people who voted against this. Punishing new York for the sins of Pennsylvania seems counter productive.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Can we stop pushing this lie. 43 percent of the people who voted in new York voted for Trump. Then there are the people who couldn't be bothered to vote.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s a lot of upstate (redder) NY that would lose power. But it’s still not going to hurt Trump enough to justify.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I wasn't entirely aware, so thank you. I was just using NY as an example. It could have been Maine, Vermont, or Washington. And maybe for each of them it would be the redder area. I wasn't as aware as I should have been. Looking it up I think it was a good guess, because it is new York. However it's Vermont too. A cursory glance says it's not Maine though.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

You're right. It's part of why we continue to play this game instead of pulling the bandaid off. Our reality is built around so many damn Catch-22s that we're paralyzed to make rational choices anymore.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don’t think Canada wants to hurt so many innocent people because Trump runs his mouth

If that's true, that's backwards logic.

Because Trump is hurting a lot more people, and while unlikely if his voters feel the pain they will realize it's not working. Congress can hold trump accountable, but they won't until well into the "find out" phase.

So our traditional allies shielding the American people from our own government may seem like the ethical move, but only if focused on today and ignoring the future...

Which is how we ended up here.

Long term, America needs consequences yesterday, but we'll have to settle for today

Quick edit:

Sure some people may have voted for Trump but a whole lot didn’t. They don’t deserve that.

As close as majorities are, a handful of seats getting pressured is all it would take. You think there ain't a single red district getting their power from Canada?

You think Montana is a deep blue area?

https://connect2canada.com/2022/04/mapping-the-canada-u-s-energy-relationship-2/

It really doesn't take many people to switch to take congress back, but if we never pressure them, they'll never fold.

No, I know we do.

I’m say they should flip the switch. Call our bluff. I really do mean it. Because it is a bluff.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As disgusting as it is, he's a lot more likely to make progress with some narrowly constructed flattery than with overt criticism no matter how well deserved.

Trump is a narcissistic manbaby who would do damn near anything just to satisfy his own ego. It makes him particularly vulnerable to manipulation, and at the same time it makes it virtually impossible for him to take criticism without throwing a tantrum and doubling down on whatever shitty thing he's doing.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

I mean he called Trump transformational which I think anyone with a brain will understand but his supporters will see as a compliment.

There was some very carefully constructed language being used here which I think is a good first step.

It should also be noted that Carney said 'Never' five times when Trump said Never say Never but I don't think Carney was visible on the American broadcast.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

NYT is as prestigious as the NYP now. Failed, garbage journalists all of them.

This is less about the quality of the NYT these days than it is about the verbatim transcript of the interchange that they posted