I bought Plex pass years ago for £79. The new price of $749.99 is INSANE.
No wonder all the cool people are using Jellyfin.
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
311 points (95.9% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
69501 readers
668 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !soulseek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And plex is entirely secure?
What was it again with security and closed source vs OSS?
Is the plex relay for remote access really secure?
Or has just nobody bothered checking it?
I never said that. I don't run a media server at all because every streaming software has its own flaws.
You can't throw shade on Jellyfin, leave plex out of the discussion and then claim to run neither and essentially not caring..
Why participate at all with this argument??
Yeah I should've probably emphasised that Plex isn't free of security vulnerabilities either, but I didn't because I never even considered running it on my server, given the insane price.
Why participate with this argument? I was hoping to be proven wrong on the claim that jellyfin is insecure.
It's impossible to prove a negative, that there are no vulnerabilities.
The constant argument being parotted (IMO a bit extra overblown) that you can read files by knowing the file path and being able to access the stream urls without authentication.
So if I know
/data/media/movie/A Super Secret Movie [2026](not unlikely due to assumed default paths with docker installations)and
https://jellyfin.example.local/I can supposedly guess that the URL is
https://jellyfin.example.local/video/source=?1029rifos0xomsoc93and access the stream.Is it an issue? Yes, you are bypassing active authentication
What is the actual security problem? You can be ddosed by being streames to death? Oh no, what will I do /s
If anyone else can give a more grave exampe why it's worse than the above example: Please do. I don't see the issue besides bypassing authentication.
That's one of the ones we know about. Consider the ones that might exist that haven't been found yet.
Literally the same can be said about Plex.