this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
515 points (95.3% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27214 readers
1221 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shirasho@feddit.online 25 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

China may be a dictatorship, but they actually put tax money into public projects. When they say they are going to do a project for the next X years it actually gets done. As a result, when cool new projects come up, the infrastructure is already there. It is one of the reasons why Chinese EVs are so good and so cheap.

Meanwhile, we have the US where the government is wholly noncommittal to public services that don't extract money from their citizens. They frequently break contracts and agreements when they are no longer profitable or beneficial to the upper class. We have private militaries kidnapping and killing legal citizens just for existing.

It's no wonder people view the US less favorably than China. Both are evil, but at least China doesn't behave like a petulant child.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

There was a documentary about how china handles business, damn if I can find it now.

They crap out a new city with a port, they offer people bonus state benefits to move there. (normally if you move out of your original area, you lose state benefits) Then they order the state run banks to give businesses 0% loans for whatever industry they're trying to ingest. They make sure that all the businesses they need get on board and fulfill the needs of the manufacturing and BAM, super cheap hard to make things.

They did with with solar, and they did this with EV's

China has some pretty heinous human rights violations, but the US has the ICE-stoppo shooting down legal workers in the streets in front of their kids and we basically handed over all the arms needed to genocide Palestine.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 15 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I'll take a dictator that seems to care about the well-being of their country over a wannabe dictator that only cares about getting paid any day.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Like Putin?

Dictators are going to be in power long after donald will be ousted.

That said, USA is really on the slippery slope to be a proto dictatorship. But you seem to like dictators so ...

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Hahaha, this guy thinks trump is going away

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Americans scream and spit on Chinese democracy while they cling to electoral colleges and governor appointed senators and the fight to disenfranchise minority voters en mass.

I just don't know how to take any of it seriously. China's a dictatorship because it's ruled by a single, seemingly insurmountable communist party. But Texas and Florida can elect Republicans to a bulletproof supermajority for 40 years and that's just the Will Of The People.

A Congress with a 20% approval rating enjoys a Lockean Mandate, while a Parliament with 50-70% approval is a tyrannical regime of brutal oppression.

And don't even get me started on prison population...

How are we even defining democracy anymore? It just seems like American Exceptionalism.

[–] ForceTen@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 hours ago

Chinese democracy is an oxymoron. Not saying American is one at this point either (especially after Trump is finished decimating everything from his 2020 temper tantrum). But let’s not prop up one as better than the other. The CCP strait up sucks too. Better if both governments failed and a better system was put in place for the benefit of both the Chinese and Americans.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

How are we even defining democracy anymore?

There are multiple organisations invested in rating democracies worldwide, the main one is from The Economist EIU ,(https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2025/, there are numerous places where the raw data is published more accessible such as here: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu).

I personally prefer the index made by Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world) because it includes what a regular citizen experiences:

For each country and territory, Freedom in the World analyzes the electoral process, political pluralism and participation, the functioning of the government, freedom of expression and of belief, associational and organizational rights, the rule of law, and personal autonomy and individual rights.

Their assessment of the US democracy:

EIU (2024): 7.85/10, "flawed democracy" Freedom in the world score (2025): 81/100

These scores obviously are not about other things that matter, like economic stability or access to healthcare.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, you can't even use China as the positive comparison here without some random tankie getting pissed I didn't adequately glaze China.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

you can’t even use China as the positive comparison here

tankie

Yeah, the comparison is positive, but also anyone who disagrees with you wants you murdered by a tank.

FFS, can you people take any level of criticism?

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I read your comment as largely, if not entirely, supportive of the guy you responded to. What am I missing?

[–] Dojan@pawb.social -2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

murdered by a tank.

Oh! All this time and I hadn't clocked that tankie was referencing the Tiananmen Square massacre. That makes a lot of sense.

I thought it was something related to think-tanks or something, some kind of weird way of saying "brainiac" or having "big-brained ideas" in a derogatory manner.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

All this time and I hadn’t clocked that tankie was referencing the Tiananmen Square massacre.

It's not. It's referencing the Hungarian Revolt of '56.

I thought it was something related to think-tanks or something

Hahaha.

Well, in my heart of hearts, this is who it's really talking about.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 5 hours ago

See, now I’m even more confused!

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

"I'll take a dictator..."

This is a MAGA talking point and repeated by MAGA supporters.

No we won't.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

In my experience, the kind of person that will purity test a hypothetical is probably gonna join the dictator's vanguard.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Chinese EVs are so cheap because of the massive direct subsidies they get from the Chinese government, not because of some infrastructure.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago

The subsidies for chinese citizens has been cut for years and phases out entirely in 2027.

There never was a subsidy for exports.

This narrative is just a way for non-competitive companies to demand protectionist measures so they don't have to invest in better factories and can continue charging more for less value.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago

Just like almost every industy in the US. Agriculture - heavily subsidized. Fossil fuels - heavily subsidized. Medicine - heavily subsidized (even if the patients don't see any of it). Defense contractors of every shade - heavily subsidized. Only difference is that the US subsidizes to help the billionnaires. China subsidizes to help the general populace.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They are cheap because of the infrastructure AND because of subsidies. But to be honest, European automotive companies also once started out with massive subsidies. Companies like Volkswagen were completely government sponsored in the beginning.