this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
405 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

86590 readers
4037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Headline conveniently phrased to attract clicks from certain segment of internet users.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 62 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

that's usually the goal of a headline

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Futurism's are particularly egregious. It exists to get clicks, and I mean in a way that clearly none of its writers give a single shit.

This headline and story in particular are okay enough, but in general, Futurism will take scraps and turn it into "[x person/business/industry our readerbase doesn't like] is literally shitting its pants and DYING".

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Every headline, really...

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I'm just part of that group recognizing when I'm being manipulated.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Chat, is it good when a stock is down 28% YTD?

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think people are tired of these headlines because we've seen the same thing for many companies, without lasting consequences. It's even worse for elon musk related stocks, because of how much manipulation those ones go through.

I don't have a source, so take it with a grain of salt, but I vaguely remember a discussion that one of his companies couldn't remove him because the stock was artificially inflated by his presence. It might have been tesla

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

There is another problem which keeps stocks like Tesla afloat when it really should have tanked a long time ago: Index funds based on indexes like S&P 500 etc., where investors are automatically buying Tesla stock when buying into the fund, which stabilizes the stock in question. Musk knows this and that was the exact reason why he tried to get indexes to bend the rules of inclusion for spaceX to be included in indexes earlier than usual. The grave consequences are people investing in index funds are directly milked. Pension funds often include indexes, so what Musk is doing there is in effect trying to steal from people who did not actively invest in SpaceX.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure it quite qualifies as a free fall yet, we can all hope though.

[–] Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 hours ago

Its been a large sudden drop

But its still over 300.

And it hasnt been under 300 since summer 2025

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

If you're a short seller, yes it is!

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

I'll admit it made me slightly giddy for a few seconds.

I needed those seconds though, so I'll take em.