this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
895 points (98.6% liked)

World News

57468 readers
1032 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kromem@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you spend an evening in talking with an AI instead of streaming a movie from Netflix in 4k you'd have used less energy. Which would be still less than just the gas used to drive a few miles away for a night out.

And all data center usage is significantly less than something like A/C usage (which is likely to be increasing as temps increase).

There's a lot of legitimate grievances and concerns about AI — just today I was seeing a mathematician having an identity crisis in response to the unrelenting solving of open questions, something probably every field will soon struggle with adapting to — but the inflated perception of the environmental impacts means that so much less public attention is being spent on the actual culprits and possible solutions thereof.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that what Ai told you? Because that is complete bullshit.

Just taking to Ai doesn't use that much energy, except unless you let it make complicated code, but the energy it took for training the LLM's for your evening conversation took so much energy, resources and caused so much pollution, you could fly an airplane around the world for an entire year and still pollute the earth less.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Hahaha — wait, do you think that the models take more energy to train than the cumulative amount used to serve them for inference across the lifetime of the model?

And if not, then what you are saying is effectively gibberish as any reasonable assessment would need to divide the training cost across all post-trained inference. So if it was only 50% the lifetime inference usage, it'd be a 1.5x multiplier to that I said above, which doesn't change either the Netflix 4k or gas mileage points.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There should be solar panels on all the roofs to help offset aircon use etc.

[–] BenevolentOne@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have solar panels on my roof, why don't you?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

For me its mostly the cost to benefit ratio given my current electricity prices. At current prices I'm not even sure I'd break even financially for my maintenaince costs of solar (like battery replacement) versus just paying my utility bill. As energy prices change that might change but currently it doesn't make sense for me, i still have a mortgage to pay and other major repairs to do to my house and ideally id have to prematurely redo the roof before installing solar.