this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
895 points (98.6% liked)

World News

57452 readers
1191 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My intuitive answer is that the collapse of globalised industrial society seems fairly likely (as a result of the end of cheap liquid fuel if nothing else). What that looks like is highly dependent on how we respond - it's not a climate problem, it's a social problem.

I don't think humans are going to go extinct, but a population crash seems likely. And we're taking out a tonne of other species.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycrisis

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would hazard that the the extintion of Mankind really depends on the innevitable water and food wars escalating out of control in the nuclear era or not.

A lot of this shit (you also see it in Economics, as Inequality explodes and Social Mobility grinds to a halt) can escalate out of control via the reactions of Human Societies to it (just look at the rise of the Far Right in response to the above mentioned trends in Inequality and Social Mobility).

As I see it, people's and countries' reaction to the problems caused by Climate Change are were the nastiest of nasty shit can come out from.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yep, plausible, but again, that's a social problem. It's super interesting, but not something a climate scientist can really speak to.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I would say that the ultimate impact on Mankind of Climate Change is itself outside the scope of Climatology by itself - by its own nature it would be an interdisciplinary effort involving at the very least Climatologists, Sociologists and Economists.

That said, anybody can, as non-expert, mention some possibilities, though obviously not claiming any authoritativeness on the subject. (That's what I tried to do, hence why I began by saying it was just my "hazarding").

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yep, agree! That first paragraph is where I'm at now, trying to work with social scientists, business people, economists, who ever is keen. That interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary work is suuuuper interesting and fun and fucking hard.

Also I'm just opinionated in general, you know? 😅