this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
1183 points (98.1% liked)

memes

22536 readers
2181 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Blocking doesn't stop them from propagandizing others.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure arguing with them really does either. I think this was true in simple chronological message boards, but anything that boosts content due to engagement is just going to make it worse...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

To be clear, I'm writing from a Lemmy/Reddit/Slashdot perspective. Maybe on Mastodon/Twitter (or, dog forbid, Facebook) it's different, but I wouldn't know because I've never used that shit.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure reddit uses some algorithmic stuff to push threads, no? If you jump all over a bullshit political post, for example, doesn't that help push it into 'hot' or whatever? (Honestly asking, been off reddit for years at this point).

Lemmy/piefed/etc might be less prone to it though, that's fair, though I've so far run into less outright propagandistic stuff here so far... might've just been lucky on that front.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I was thinking more in terms of replying to the comments within threads, rather than the posts themselves. But yeah, I guess you've got a point that the number of comments under a post might influence its position in some types of feeds.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True but sometimes you have to pick your battles for your own mental health.

[–] Azteh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Very true, but be careful not to end up in an echo chamber

[–] SiegeRhino@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

oh no my echo chamber of funny comics and cat pictures aaa oh nooooo

[–] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

:3 you made me laugh. meow!

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Tons of drawn porn in mine. Bit of politics and most importantly almost no slop.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Echo Chambers are great. You just think they're horrible because you're in an echo chamber that says they're horrible.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You wouldn't say that if you actually knew that most echo chambers are like the Incels, the neonazis or the pro-MAGA.

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The tankies too. Sometimes they remind me of a cult that tried to recruit me

Yeah, that's true

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Worst Battle of the Bands lineup ever

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago

It sure would be nice to have the choice to opt-in to an echo chamber, instead of being told that I cannot opt-out of the opposite.

[–] fisch@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But interacting with them will be interpreted as "engagement" and lead the algorithms to push them into more feeds and rank them higher.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well not on lemmy I don't think they use algorathms to rank content and are open about how they rank comments and such. Not entirely sure though I am not a computer guy.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Sorting by ‘active’ takes into account the time of the last comment, and/or the number of comments. And it's the default sorting option in the default UI and apps that I've seen.

[–] whyderrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The big problem is discerning when you're playing chess against a pigeon, and when you're acting like the pigeon yourself. "I would never" - a pigeon

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 2 points 20 hours ago

We all think we're not that guy. Especially that guy.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago

oh, yeah! sometimes we need to use the report button too.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interacting with them won't either. There is no winning with them.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The point is not to change the troll's opinion; the point is to discredit them in front of whoever else may be reading the thread.

Also, the other action other than blocking them is reporting them and having a mod or admin remove them for everybody at once.

Both of those are better options than individually blocking.

[–] the_fuckler@nord.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Not gonna lie, I see people doing this theatrical shit in the 2020's and I instantly hate them for killing any good vibes that were happening. They no longer represent their politics to me.

Yeah.

There are vulnerable people that might fall for their bullshit, so at least we must deny their nonsense so that fewer people fall for it.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

If they're propagandizing, there's not an argument you can make to stop them.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If everyone blocks them then yes. I'm doing my part of the job.