this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
247 points (99.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

4987 readers
834 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — Quinten Martinez, pumping gas under a hot South Texas sun, remembers a time when fueling up didn’t require difficult decisions.

“Is it going to be groceries this week?” asked the 28-year-old Amazon delivery driver as he watched the numbers tick higher. “Is it gonna be getting gas in our tank to go to work?”

He shook his head when asked about President Donald Trump’s assertion last week that higher gas prices are a small price to pay for the war with Iran.

“I don’t feel like it’s a good trade-off,” Martinez said. “I don’t feel like this is good for anyone.”

Voters across the country, and across the political spectrum, tend to agree.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of idiots will still believe the Republicans are "good at the economy".

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, but given the GOP's election losses in 2025 and 2026, not enough of them.

Not that it matters. Democrats won't do anything about affordability either.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not that it matters. Democrats won’t do anything about affordability either.

Yeah, the Democrats are a mix of assholes, ghouls, spineless jellyfish, and maybe some decent folks. It's sad that that's the best mainstream option, but I'd rather work with them than the frothing nightmares of the Republican party.

There's no good way out of this hell. But at least some socialists have won some elections

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we're at the stage where we need a consitutional convention between states or just violence... like make the politicians scared to do ethical breaches.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s time for there to be 4 separate countries that each do thing their own way.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

4 little americas, ya.... who gets the nukes??

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Same as USSR. They stay where they were.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

You know who likes the idea of 4 little Americas?? META, GOOG, AAPL, AMZN. That’s who will be buying the debt and dissolving the union.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Then we should try dissolving the corporation first instead... in 55gal polyethylene drums.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

That’s…. Not how the USSR worked at all. There’s a whole war in Ukraine right now that’s based on Ukraine giving nukes away due to security promises America failed to fulfill.

Do you know where the nukes are now? Do you think that the Confederate states of America might try to you know….. do the thing again??

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So where did those nukes end up when USSR dissolved? Right where they were until some years later when a deal was made to move them. I don't think you got me as hard as you think you did.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

???? So where do our nukes go after we decided it’s really unsafe for 4 unstable newly minted countries to? I’m sure all the little quadrants of new America would love to concede their power.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It's odd that you think that I am responsible for solving all these issues before anyone has even broached it as a possible approach.