this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
111 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70716 readers
410 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
unruffled@anarchist.nexus
111
What do you think is the future of file sharing? (programming.dev)
submitted 5 days ago by tatterdemalion@programming.dev to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There are now many technologies for P2P file sharing:

  • Usenet
  • Bittorrent
  • IPFS
  • Tenfinger
  • more?

And also several technologies for anonymization:

  • VPNs
  • Tor
  • I2P

AFAICT the most popular option is still Bittorrent with various public and private trackers and indexers. Private trackers seem to be the most effective option that communities have converged on.

I've tried all of the above solutions over the years and while I think something like I2P sounds great in theory, it doesn't seem to actually work well in practice. Because it's not terribly popular, it's hard to know what to expect.

We clearly still haven't found the ideal model that can provide both good performance, discovery, access, availability, and anonymity. But do you think we will actually make progress on these problems? We seem to have stabilized on a local maximum.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Do people not recommend PIA anymore? I've used it for a long time and never had issues. Supports port forwarding. Audits have shown they don't store activity logs, and they even run RAM-only servers.

EDIT: Just looked at AirVPN. It's nice they don't request any identifying info on signup.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In older versions of Soulseek, you had to have two consecutive port numbers (eg. 20000 and 20001, or 12345 and 12346, etc). AirVPN was the only VPN that let you pick the port numbers, so you could guarantee getting two consecutive ports.

I don't think modern Soulseek clients require that any more (slskd only requires one port as far as I can tell) so it's not important any more, but AirVPN is still the most recommended by Soulseek users.

Private Internet Access only give you a single forwarded port, so you couldn't use it for both torrents and Soulseek at the same time (for example). AirVPN used to provide 20, but I think they reduced it to 5 for new accounts.

AirVPN's forwarded ports are also not server-specific; you get your chosen ports regardless of which server you use.

[–] diocesegoldmine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Well fuck me. I mean I don't think that's an immediate issue for me but that does suck.

EDIT: Although if we're being honest, has PIA been found doing anything shady in the 7 years since they were acquired?

[–] diocesegoldmine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Being owned by Israel is the shady thing, I assume anything owned by Israel to be compromised and to have a backdoor. Same as I would any technology owned by the 4 eyes.