this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
507 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

6218 readers
678 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FridaVanMercury@discuss.tchncs.de 100 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Cool idea but also really impractical? Stuff like Anna's archive seems more useful.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The website does say this is about awareness for children and teens at which point the actual deep reading seems less important than picking them up where they're at, so, minecraft. On the other hand it claims that while dictatorships usually ban social media, news etc. minecraft is still freely accessible. Like that's about the first thing they plaster over the site. At which point I do think you're just gonna get minecraft banned.

[–] robotElder2@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Are children and teens still into Minecraft? I thought they'd moved on to roblox.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago

Minecraft and Roblox kids exist simultaneously. Roblox is older, believe it or not.

And yes, kids and teens are 100% still into Minecraft.

[–] DekSomBoon@lemmy.today 72 points 13 hours ago

I'm guessing the benefit of this is that it just looks like a normal minecraft server so it is harder to block, but yeah there are other more efficient ways to share files out there

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 32 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Anna's Archive is also a very easy target for government censorship because of its practicality.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Distributed, self-repairing storage would seem to be the way to go. Anna's Archive is huge so practically it might be necessary to prioritize the most threatened books. And someone would need to pay for the storage, whether it's in data centres or in people's homes. I remember many years ago experimenting with Freenet and Tahoe-LAFS, but I don't know if anyone's using systems like this for books, or if they have the adoption they'd need to be really robust.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

Freenet looks cool. I think the closest we get to that right now that people actually use is soulseek i guess. Plenty of people on that with stuff.

God damn it freenet does the mortal sin of its official installation instructions telling you to curl straight into sh. No Friend I Do Not Trust You Like That.