this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
289 points (97.1% liked)

World News

58560 readers
1740 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 138 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I love how the article seems to equate “failure of the state” with police running out of ammo and not ending the violence quickly enough. Not the decades of policies that led to thousands of people feeling like they need to destroy infrastructure.

[–] maya_s_trojan@piefed.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The state views inability to control it's populace as a "failure" because the states we have enabled to become our modern governance have stopped actually giving a shit about their actual constituents and consistently roll out the red carpet for the rich and corrupt. Loss of control is a failure, real democracy is a failure. The real issue is they clearly (and the media as well) don't have the same goals as the people they lord over.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago

They have never had the same goals nor given a shit. This is nothing new. This piece of writing is almost 100 years old now:

What is it that every one wants most in life? What do you want most?

After all, we are all the same under our skins. Whoever you be — man or woman, rich or poor, aristocrat or tramp, white, yellow, red or black, of whatever land, nationality, or religion — we are all alike in feeling cold and hunger, love and hate; we all fear disaster and disease, and try to keep away from harm and death.

What you most want out of life, what you fear most, that also is true, in the main, of your neighbor.

Learned men have written big books, many of them, on sociology, psychology, and many other ‘ologies’, to tell you what you want, but no two of those books ever agree. And yet I think that you know very well without them what you want.

They have studied and written and speculated so much about this, for them so difficult a question, that you, the individual, have become entirely lost in their philosophies. And they have at last come to the conclusion that you, my friend, don’t count at all. What’s important, they say, is not you, but ‘the whole’, all the people together. This ‘whole’ they call ‘society’, ‘the commonwealth’, or ‘the State’, and the wiseacres have actually decided that it makes no difference if you, the individual, are miserable so long as ‘society’ is all right. Somehow they forget to explain how ‘society’ or ‘the whole’ can be all right if the single members of it are wretched.

So they go on spinning their philosophic webs and producing thick volumes to find out where you really enter in the scheme of things called life, and what you really want.

But you yourself know very well what you want, and so does your neighbor.

You want to be well and healthy; you want to be free, to serve no master, to crawl and humiliate yourself before no man; you want to have well-being for yourself, your family, and those near and dear to you. And not to be harassed and worried by the fear of to-morrow.

You may feel sure that every one else wants the same. So the whole matter seems to stand this way:

You want health, liberty, and well-being. Every one is like yourself in this respect.

Therefore we all seek the same thing in life.

Then why should we not all seek it together, by joint effort, helping each other in it?

Why should we cheat and rob, kill and murder each other, if we all seek the same thing? Aren’t you entitled to the things you want as well as the next man?

Or is it that we can secure our health, liberty, and well-being better by fighting and slaughtering each other?

Or because there is no other way?

Let us look into this.

Does it not stand to reason that if we all want the same thing in life, if we have the same aim, then our interests must also be the same? In that case we should live like brothers, in peace and friendship; we should be good to each other, and help each other all we can.

But you know that it is not at all that way in life. You know that we do not live like brothers. You know that the world is full of strife and war, of misery, injustice, and wrong, of crime, poverty, and oppression.

Why is it that way then?

It is because, though we all have the same aim in life, our interests are different. It is this that makes all the trouble in the world.

Just think it over yourself.

Suppose you want to get a pair of shoes or a hat. You go into the store and you try to buy what you need as reasonably and cheaply as you can. That is your interest. But the store-keeper’s interest is to sell it to you as dearly as he can, because then his profit will be greater. That is because everything in the life we live is built on making a profit, one way or another. We live in a system of profit-making.

Now, it is plain that if we have to make profits out of each other, then our interests cannot be the same. They must be different and often even opposed to each other.

In every country you will find people who live by making a profit out of others. Those who make the biggest profits are rich. Those who cannot make profits are poor. The only people who cannot make any profits are the workers. You can therefore understand that the interests of the workers cannot be the same as the interests of the other people. That is why you will find in every country several classes of people with entirely different interests.

From Now and After by Alexander Berkman. Chapter 1: What Do You Want Out Of Life?

Available to read or download in multiple formats, for free, here: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-berkman-what-is-communist-anarchism

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Media is complicit with Epstein class

[–] maya_s_trojan@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I worked in local television news media for a decade in the early 2000's.

It's worse than that: we just don't even teach these people how to be actual journalists.

I remember working in production, catching a new, state-level important story, with court documents proving as much. I printed it and put it on the desk of several reporters. The producer refused to run the story because they "didn't see the story on the AP Newswire." In other words they refused to run the story until a major network ran it first. Three weeks later they ran the story after someone else ran it first.

Recall, I worked in production. I wasn't a newsie. I had better news instincts than these fucking clowns who went to school for it.

It's just rubes saying "yes daddy I'll do whatever you tell me" all the way down.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Journalism is a thing of the past, it seems :(

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

journalists don't get paid very much AFAIK, so it's not a position who is attracting talent. that's why we see a whole fucking lot of mediocre news articles who fail to comprehend what's actually important.

that and because it's not a very "respectable" position in the eyes of the public. have you ever met a child who said "i want to be a journalist" and their parents were joyous? i haven't. if anything at all, you can expect your parents to give you a lecture of how it's not a "good" job, you won't "earn any bread" with it.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

Journalism used to be a respected profession too. Starting 1971 or so after the business roundtable that made a long game to seize control of democracy they demonized them, along with a great many other things.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The government is openly blaming "the radical left" when it's clearly a much broader protest by now.

Not sure leftists are the ones breaking into tobacconists, stealing cigarettes and selling them on the street outside. That's a little bit too enterprising no? lol

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

They're citing a mayor whose town hall got burned down

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago

better education in prison

it was all a cunning plan