this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
54 points (93.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

44246 readers
349 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I seem to recall one of the primates we taught sign language to indicated that they liked cooked food more because it tasted better.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Sign language in primates is dubious at best.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Especially if they use it to ask for steak well done.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

He gets the Children's Chimpanzee Menu

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 6 days ago

And ask for ketchup!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We tortured a lot of apes to prove Noam Chomsky right: language was an innate human ability and not something other animals can learn. Even the apes that learned English words or sign never once asked a question.

Almost everything you've heard that an Ape "singed" was "interpreted" by a handler or trainer; the actual transcripts are not intelligible. I'm sure some researchers and trainers were acting in good faith, but you can see how much room to fudge there is.

Coco the gorilla was a fraud. (well, her handlers were frauds) for example, her handler often claimed that Coco would use rhymes to indicate what she "really" meant. The problem is that a native sign-language user would have no idea that two English words rhymed. Their are rhymes in sign, where the motions are similar, not the phonetics.

[–] spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

lol no. Not in the absolute sense. Language IS NOT IN ANY WAY, "unique to humans". Period. Ever.

In fact, there have been a few recent studies that show whale language is as complicated as Chinese.

[–] Heide@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

What about the one where the Japanese guy isolated the bird language words for "danger, snake!", then played it on speakers to wild birds, which caused them to panic and start looking around for the snake.

One of the most convincing experiments showing that animals have language that I've seen. The video is on YouTube

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A random arrangement of grains of sand is more complicated than Chinese.

[–] spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A random arrangement of my shit is more complicated than your brain.

Your opinion means less than nothing.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

The problem is that a native sign-language user would have no idea that two English words rhymed

I do agree it's a fraud, but I'd also say "native sign language speaker" is a bit of a misnomer. Comparing it to a human we'd be talking about someone with perfect hearing but born mute. IE if they were taught by someone who spoke out loud as they signed, they would understand ryming in ways that someone who was deaf obviously wouldn't.