this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
467 points (99.6% liked)

World News

58720 readers
1924 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's odd to see Americans siding with Russia, to be honest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Because humanity loses access to LEO for at least a generation if that happens.

[–] bier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I know what Kessler syndrome is. Im saying that it's not that easy to get started especially for Russia. The us demonstrated it's capability in this respect with the DART "mission" which in my opinion was more of a military use case and something that absolutely shouldn't be funded by NASA. One would think that if it where that easy for Russia to get any advantage in this war they would have done it by now no matter the reprocussions.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Deflecting a large, irregular, rotating mass in deep space is a pretty different mission from launching a missile at LEO targets or launching an explosive vehicle from a satellite currently in orbit. The people I know that worked DART are now working other civil space missions like Dragonfly, the mission to Titan.

I guess they both involve orbital dynamics to calculate the rendezvous, but they're very different orbital regimes.

Anyway, I disagree that it was military adjacent or more appropriate to be done via military funding. It doesn't have direct military application in the near future. Even proposals I've seen for stuff like GPS on the moon is being funded on the civilian side.