Linux

15321 readers

276 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Linux Distribution Chooser Tool (unknownuniverse.uk)

submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@no.lastname.nz to c/linux@programming.dev

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Would be funny if somebody forked it but with all results ending up in Arch linux.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All roads eventually end up at Arch. And then some people get lost in the misty Nix Forest. Some never find their way out.

[–] farooqkz@realbitcoin.cash 0 points 5 hours ago

I went from Ubuntu to Debian, then to Arch, then to Alpine. Can't wait to move off from Linux completely to get a kernel with a sane democratic management.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, some of us land on Gentoo from the beginning, and then watch the Arch people act like teens who think they're edgy. 😜

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Arch users think they're... "edgy"? Honestly, if I had the patience to wait for compilation when upgrading, I'd run Gentoo as well. Arch for me was the next best thing in terms of making the system "my own". I mostly feel in love with the packaging system of Arch and how easy it was to make my own packages. Great stuff.

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gentoo provides binary packages if you don't want to compile.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's cool. What does Gentoo do better than Arch in your opinion? Any category! 🙂

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't used Arch in a long time, but from what I remember...

Arch and Gentoo are both rolling releases, but Gentoo is rolling stable while Arch is bleeding edge.

If you game, you can't beat being able to drop kernel patches in a folder and have them applied on every update. Works for all packages, not just the kernel.

GURU has a bit more oversight than the AUR, but not as many packages.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven't broken my system in a decade, seems like it's fine for personal use anyway.
I don't need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

Still, I'm curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 2 points 6 hours ago

You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

I've never contributed to the AUR, so I can't really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

That's completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I swear there was already a version of that where every option leads to EndeavourOS