1280
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
1280 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
89443 readers
4292 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You know someone's value by the company they choose to keep, in my opinion.
They made the choice to partner with a university that supports genocide. No one forced them.
By that logic you probably also cancel anyone who uses Microsoft, because undoubtedly they also make business with Israel.
First of all, I am not cancelling anyone. I am choosing with my wallet which organization align with my ethical standards.
Unfortunately Microsoft has a stranglehold with M365, so I also have to be practical. But I do not do any business with Microsoft directly, and actually prefer organizations which also do not use Microsoft where I can. It's the same with Amazon or Cloudflare for example. I do not do any business with them directly, but also it is impossible to avoid organizations that don't work with them because they run most of the internet.
In the case of Proton, it's an add-on to an add-on service which is not the core part of their business.
I feel this attitude of it's all or nothing is very defeatist and is used as an excuse to not try to make better choices. Just because not all of my choices are 100% aligned with my ethical values due to the world we live in, it does not mean I should not make better choices where I can.
To me it looks like you apply standards rather arbitrary, not because the standards are reasonable in the first place, but to loudly proclaim your moral stance. Which is antizionist, and in the internet hardly distinguishable from its bigger sister antisemitism. And particularly the arbitration is a reason to suspect your comment has little to do with Protons CEOs stance towards AI, but much more with intoxicating everything with antizionist rhetoric.
How am i being arbitrary? How is it not reasonable to not want to give money to institutions that do business with people directly supporting the Israeli military?
Semitism is a religion, Zionism is a political ideology. Not every Zionist is a Jew and not every Jewish person is Zionist.
I have nothing against Jewish or Israeli people for that matter. In fact I fully support all the Israeli people currently protesting against the genocide.
I just pointed out an addition reason to move away from proton which matters to me. Is it not an important reason to you, then fine.
Hm let's see. Do you support those same Israelis also should they succeed and want to continue to live in their own country?
First thing. Do you accept that israel is commiting a genocode in Palestine, and that its immoral?
Now for my answer to your question. I am not naive enough to say its not a complicated issue. Many generations have passed since Palestinian land was stolen to form Israel. The same can be said for a lot of other countries, but it's not as recent history as here.
I am not smart enough to come up with an answer, but I am sure smarter people can come up with something that is fair to Palestinians whose land were stolen and population murdered, and Israelis who were born there because of actions taken many generations ago.
But while the Israeli government is literally irradicating the Palestinian people, this is an irrelevant discussion. The Zionist goal is to conquer Palestine and get rid of all the Arabs in the process. The fact that they are commiting crimes against humanity, which are on pat (if nor worst) to what the Nazis did to the Jews is unquestionable. Is it too much to say we should boycott any organizations enabling and or defending genocide?
The term genocide has two very distinct meanings. One is the juridical meaning, and I believe there is enough substance to have this disputed at the ICC. I'm all for bringing netanyahu and his bunch to justice, and even should the genocide not hold up for some reason, there certainly will be enough evidence crimes against humanity so they can serve a long long time.
The other is the moral meaning. But in my eyes this is very overused by the antizionist zeal. It was already used right on October 7th before Israel did any reaction to the hamas attacks, and for every single action since. The story of the boy who cried wolf comes to mind.
it's arguments like this which makes the movement seem so uneducated:
The Nazis took every single Jew (and communist, and disabled or homosexual person, or any other scapegoat group) of any age they could find, in Germany, or any conquered country and put them into wagon trains. The trains would take the victims to Dachau or another concentration and working camp, if they were lucky. Dachau is a museum nowadays, school classes go in there joking, and come out very very sober. It's worth a visit.
If they were less lucky they would be brought to Auschwitz or Treblinka or another of the 6 extermination camps. There they were carefully registered, stripped of clothes, dignity and anything remotely of worth, and then either put directly into the gas chambers. Or they were put into the camp from which workers were selected for moving the bodies into the furnaces. Alternatively, from the camp they were picked for a death march, or a ride on a truck, where the exhaust was funneled into the loading area, with the purpose to asphyxiate the victims. Or they were picked for experiments from the likes of Joseph Mengele. Or or or ...
The list of Nazi crimes is much longer than this. And it is also very well documented. These things happened without a doubt.
I see many accusations against the IDF, and the list of accusations of crimes against humanity is long and worth following through before the ICC. But the Nazi comparison only shows you have no real historic perspective.
I am well aware of history, thank you. I've been to Dachau and Auschwitz. It was horrible.
You are making a difference without distinction. All I read is, the mass killing of Arabs is not as bad as the mass killing of Jews. Doesn't matter that they are mass killing Palestinians, starving the whole country, raping women and children, bombing hospitals, using chemical weapons, torturing prisoners. Tell me that the Israelis are not stripping the Palestinians of their dignity and all they are worth. Morally speaking I see no difference.
Even if I were to concede that Nazis were worse than what Israel is doing in Palestine, and that its not a genocide, it does change the fact of the immortality and human rights violalation they are perpetrating because of the Zionist ideology.
You clearly have a bone to pick with anyone with disagrees with Zionism. I'm done.