this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
410 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

89639 readers
2555 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Yes, all computer parts should be made by one company on an internationally disputed island. What could go wrong?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 57 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's an interesting strategy if you're Taiwan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_shield

Silicon shield is the principle in geopolitical relations regarding Chinese unification that the semiconductor industry in Taiwan is important enough to global economic prosperity that it would deter an attempt by China to seize Taiwan by force, and if not would induce foreign powers, particularly the United States, to defend Taiwan in order to preserve the stability of the semiconductor supply chain.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

The risk I see with this is that the strategy rests on the assumption of states acting in rational self-interest. While this is generally a reasonable assumption to make, it has become abundantly clear that it's not always true.

Hypothetically, if China came under control of a megalomaniac willing to compromise Chinese interests and safety (or unwilling to consider that risk) for the sake of nationalist ambitions to "reclaim" Taiwan, things could get ugly. Would the US actually retaliate? Would it fight open war against a nuclear power headed by someone willing to cut their whole country's nose to spite their face?

Conversely, if the US came under control of a foreign asset (or useful idiot) willing to strike a deal with China for cheap access to the chips they need for their American Intelligence, selling out Taiwan in the process and probably getting fucked over in the process, it might allow them to entrench so deeply that even subsequent presidents would have a hard time dislodging them without, again, risking nuclear war.

I don't think either scenario is likely, but I also didn't think the US would let Pedonald run for another term, let alone elect him, so maybe my judgement just sucks.

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

This is the real answer. Taiwan could have 0 military & China would STILL second guess a forced re-annexation.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They also have a factory in Arizona.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Only for obsolete fab technologies for underpowered IOT chips. The fabs that make 2nm current generation chips are all in Taiwan.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

all the top of the line is made by taiwan on the island.

[–] gingernate@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe they would make it at the arizona USA tsmc facility?

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

China is taking Taiwan. Probably in 28.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, Intel also makes high end chips and they do most of that in the US. And it’s unlikely TSMC would run all the other memory producers out of business.