this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
546 points (99.3% liked)

World News

47548 readers
3117 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brett Wilkins Jun 16, 2025

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an "unprecedented mass deployment" to Europe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 40 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Are people surprised? Republicans are war hawks even more so than the Libs.

[–] BingoBongoBang@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Dude, USA is the country that is involved in most wars - starts them / finances them / whatever. And they usually find a dummy excuse to preserve their facade of doing good.

Face the truth - you are the bully of the world and the ruling party does not matter.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Who are you even replying to

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Was I ever in denial that the USA likes to play bully and world police? Let's not forget our history about the rest of the Western nations, they're hardly angels themselves. We're all the same people anyways. Actually that reminds me of a good ole George Carlin quote, "We come from that northern European, basically the northern European genes, the blue eyes. Those blue eyes. Boy everybody in the world learned real quick, didn’t they? When those blue eyes sail out of the north, you better nail everything down motherfucker."

[–] BingoBongoBang@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

Agreed. I wanted just to emphasize that the party does not make much of a difference in regards to wars.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 27 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

But only against countries that pose no threat to them i.e. they are chickenhawks. At least Biden could do the bare minimum to help Ukraine.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

And considerably more than the bare minimum to help Israel

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They are jingoists, and jingoists are no different than schoolyard bullies who want to appear tough so they loudly proclaim how tough and big they are, which includes an occasional show of force against those they believe won't/can't defend themselves to reinforce their image of being the biggest Tough Guy™ around.

If they win, they win. If they lose, it's because they decided it wasn't worth their time and left willingly, not because they lost.

This country has always been stuck up its own ass.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

You'd be surprised. There are quite a few on lemmy that still do the both sides are the same. Oddly trying to do anything to form a new progressive is also something they don't seem interested in either.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Biden ran on getting back into the deal with Iran, then insisted that Iran must completely return to fulfilling their side of the deal before we would consider returning to ours.

Both sides are not the same but Biden shouldn't be let off the hook for his sudden flip on this issue.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Both sides are the same because Biden said something that suggested he might be hard on Iran (definitely couldn't be a negotiating tactic)?

Yes I know how you ended your comment, I was replying to the rest of it.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 5 hours ago

(definitely couldn't be a negotiating tactic)?

No, it definitely wasn't a "negotiation tactic". It was meant to avoid negotiating without Biden's adoring masses noticing that he did a 180. He caved to AIPAC, as he would continue to do throughout his term.

Why the hell would Iran go back to fulfilling it's obligations under the agreement when the US was still ignoring it's obligations? Why would it bother negotiating with a country that doesn't honor negotiated agreements? Everyone in the foreign policy space knew exactly what it was.

Yes I know how you ended your comment,

Then why the fuck did you haul out "both sides"? Why are so many people desperate to throw everything into that frame?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Its one thing to be unhappy with the democrats. Its another (and self defeating) to not want to expand the progressive wing inside of it (or to form a new party and go for local elections) and to not stall alt right republicans everywhere else.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely, I just don't think it actually helps Democrats in the long run to pave over their often deep flaws. If we were harder on Democrats 30 years ago, we probably wouldn't have Trump today.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Nobody is paving over anything, you just cannot help yourself but shit on them theoretical shit that Biden didn't even fucking do yet.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Biden didn't even fucking do yet.

Yet? I'm not sure how to argue with someone who thinks Biden is still president. It doesn't seem worthwhile.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah when liberals kill a wedding party or hospital at least they act sad.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oddly trying to do anything to form a new progressive is also something they don’t seem interested in either.

Its okay to not like liberals, but that part of my original comment is important.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I read that and it made me sad because that will literally never happen in my potential grandchildren’s lifetimes

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Same, but

A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they know they shall never sit.

We still need to get the ball rolling. The institutions and networks we need will take a lot of time to build. I know a lot of our fellow lefties don't want to interact with anything government, but doing so with the goals of harm reduction gives us space to lay the roots and set up the next generation for success. If we are serious about things we need follow ups for our protests and making the best efforts we can in our sub-ideal situations.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I would rather build a real, actual house for people than a system of oppression built on violence.

And before you say “habitat for humanity Jimmy Carter “ it’s the same catty bureaucracy I’ve found everywhere.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I would rather build a real, actual house for people than a system of oppression built on violence.

And that does not happen overnight, if you don't follow up protests, and some voting.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Bitch I’ve been voting for a quarter fucking century.

I protested the fucking Iraq war II and it still fucking happened.

Keep telling me this bullshit actually works like I’m some fucking eighteen year old.

Democracy is broken

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

I think some of the people here are literal children... At least I hope so with how naive and clueless about history they are.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

And we need more people to join us