this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
1318 points (99.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

3403 readers
1329 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 20 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I really wish Gavin Newsom would stop being transphobic so I could appreciate when he actually does good for people.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Is he actively, continuously transphobic, or was it just that time everyone talks about? One time is too many, but there are way worse folks for sure. I don't really follow Californian politics though

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He just vetoed a bill that would have allowed trans people to legally stockpile a year’s worth of hormones. This happened during a time when Republicans are floating national HRT bans for trans people of any age. His excuse was that this would somehow raise healthcare costs… By paying for a year’s worth of medication that people are already on and are going to stay on for the next year. It is a flimsy excuse and he’s a POS for it.

He also vetoed a bill last year that would have expedited licensing for out of state doctors who moved to California if those doctors practice gender affirming health or mental health care as part of their practice. This is a big deal not only because it’s shitty, but because there’s an expected increase in trans patients after care is banned in other states.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for giving me more to look into than googling Gavin Newsom transphobic. But to be honest, I have enough on my plate at home and until he is running for national office, that's what I need to save my energy for you know?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago

No worries, if you’d like to look up more about the specific bills later when you have time (or if you’d like to just put it in a text document until it’s relevant), they were SB 418 and AB 2442.

I mostly only know about it because I’m trans and in California, I couldn’t tell you a thing about most other governors! Focus local first is always smart.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He repeated the lie “keeping up with pronouns is difficult”

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I believe there have been 3 different instances this year but i'll be honest with you im tired and dont feel like looking and vetting sources. Feel free to look it up on your own.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

I absolutely feel you and it's why I am grateful for the other response. Googling Gavin Newsom transphobic is just an energy drain for me at this point. I believe it, that sucks. Pretty big "one thing" poison pill

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

he still believes he can court some on the fence transphobic voters i guess? hes okay with everything else lgbtq+ just not trans rights. no doubt he has financial benefactor that is pressuring him to not heed trans right.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It doesn’t have to be a good look, but it seemed more like cowardice and being manipulatable than it did actively hating trans people.

That’s the case for a lot of Americans. They’re opposed to the idea of their tax dollars being used for gender surgery; when it’s pointed out people pay for them themselves, they’re like “…Well, then I don’t care, do what you want.”

And yes, I’m aware that kind of cowardice is sometimes just as bad as hatefulness. I’d certainly rather a leader with a stronger spine than him.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 10 points 6 days ago

That's the case for a lot of Americans. They're opposed to the idea of their tax dollars being used for gender surgery;

That’s ignorance and bigotry as all healthcare should be covered even when individuals have rare conditions that cost millions to treat, covering trans care costs peanuts in comparison and improves health outcomes. The sky didn’t fall when the Yukon fully funded gender affirming care.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

It doesn’t have to be a good look, but it seemed more like cowardice and being manipulatable than it did actively hating trans people.

So in other words, even worse than over bigotry.