this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
70 points (83.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

42836 readers
508 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Is Satnav an Aussie term? I only know it from Bluey.

And I use GPS (what we Americans call it, even though that's technically incorrect) for routes I'm well familiar with, mostly because of either traffic awareness or finding a new scenic route.

What it doesn't know is the driving habits of others.

I don't usually drive into work anymore, but my job is in Cambridge MA. For those not familiar with the area, there are two ways in from points south on the highways....tunnel, or pike.

My decision of which way to go comes down to how much traffic I expect at the exit.

If I go Pike, I have to deal with a shitty lane shift at the offramp that nobody executes properly and I always end up nearly getting fender-checked every time.

If I go tunnel, it's like...three consecutive exits that have to be taken. Like you get off the exit, then a sub-exit, then another sub-exit. Between exits one and two you have to get over a lane...except that lane is always backed up past where the first exit merges with it. So you have to be an asshole and speed past all of them and stop somewhere in the middle when you see a good enough gap...or you have to stop at the exit and get in the middle of the line. Either way you have to be a huge asshole to get where you need to go.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The trick is zooming out to get an overview. In old days we looked at a map and had and overview- I'll go north a bit and then turn west at a junction or landmark. Now it's all zoomed in- you go straight for 3 miles and turn right with no idea where you are relative to other things.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Also having everything rotating around the car as you turn makes it very hard to know what you're doing.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Man I turn that shit off. Makes me dizzy. N is up.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

I do the same thing in video games! I HATE when the minimap rotates all over the place - North is up, damnit!

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Spoken with true Northern Hemisphere privilege.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Well it’s just normal for me. The UI should allow fixed orientation for what ever direction you want. The rotation is the problem. Nobody would ever rotate a map like that.

[–] topherclay@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

People absolutely rotate maps like that.

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 27 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Even when I know the route like the back of my hand I still use GPS. Why? Because if there's any variation in the route, such as due to construction or a parade, I'm no longer 100% sure of how to get where I'm going, and a driver that doesn't know where they're going in is one of the more dangerous things on the road IMO.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago

Whether being unsure of where you going translates to being danger is entirely a matter of attitude. If you blast over lanes when you spot an exit late, then that's dangerous, but you can also just... not do that, and accept that you'll go the wrong way sometimes.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I use my GPS every day on my way home from work. I know the route very well, but 10% of the time, the highway gets a crazy amount of traffic; and you can't tell it's backed up until you get on it. My GPS knows though. It saves me 30 extra minutes every time it happens and I just take the back roads.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Being not 100% certain of something isn't dangerous if you have critical thinking skills. It sounds like you fear what you can't plan for, which is one of the dangerous side effects of people relying on technology like this. Unless you're travelling in an area that you don't frequent, how could you be surprised by construction or a parade, both of which are things that are announced weeks ahead of time?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

There's a lot of roadworks around me that I never know about until I hit them. Are you monitoring websites for that or what? I'm sure a lot of the info is available somewhere but I think it's reasonable to realise that a lot of people aren't going to get it - especially when a satnav can automatically use that information.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Being not 100% certain of something isn't dangerous if you have critical thinking skills.

Critical thinking requires not being 100% confident and seeking confirmation to establish "knowns" so educated guesses are more educated than guess.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Broadly speaking people following memorized or planned routes had some clearly dangerous stuff.

Like "I'm nowhere near the correct lane but that's the exit I know to take so I'm going to get over there no matter what". Sure I still see it happen, but people that feel good about the backup plan feel better that it'll get them on track in a reasonably ok way. Yes, presumably the next exit you can turn around, but in some places that could be quite a distance and the gps is likely to sort out a less punishing route.

On the unusual circumstances, practically speaking that's usually an accident or traffic. However plenty of times you have construction not announced in any way you are likely to know. If they are going to work on a major interstate then if possible they put up a big sign. If they are emergency repairing a pothole, you won't have warning. Here the most recent parade was due to a celebration about three days after something happened to celebrate. Very little warning and I only knew if that because of listening to local news.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

If you know your exit is coming up from memory why would you not already be in the correct lane? You’ve learned the route, you should be able to recognize when an exit is getting close. My concern with a gps is that it’s easy to get caught up in keeping track of traffic immediately around you, then get surprised when the gps says to take the next exit in half a mile because you didn’t know the road well enough to recognize the buildings/markers that it’s getting close, and you have gps so why bother looking at the actual signs.

If taking the next exit is an issue because it might take a while, then how does a gps figure out a shorter route? It’s literally the next exit, there is nowhere else to go before that exit, and if it’s taken a while to get there then the main road is almost certainly the fastest route back.

If I’m going somewhere for the first time in a while I will often check the gps before I leave to see if there’s construction or road closures because it can be helpful, but once I’ve confirmed there isn’t I close the gps and run off memory. One time a couple months ago I was driving down the freeway in the boonies and construction closed down a chunk of it. I started following the detour and got out of cell service range. Eventually there was another detour sign that directed my back toward the main road after the construction area. It was very helpful and also the norm when there is construction or events taking place, at least in my neck of the US.

I think gps can be a useful tool in the short term or to learn routes, but when I start talking about driving westbound on one of the largest freeways in the metro or point “that way” and my friend gives me a dull look because all they know is “turn left here” and “exit here,” it’s become a crutch. But I almost definitely put a higher value on knowing where I am and how to navigate than the average person does, and I don’t expect that to change, so it’s something I’ve come to (begrudgingly) accept.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

I only knew if that because of listening to local news

Yes, that is how you learn about these things.

Wtf, I feel like you're just describing people that don't know how to exist without the internet. If you miss your exit, then you simply get off at the next one and double back.

What about the danger of someone looking at their satnav telling them to "exit now" and then they cross five lanes of traffic almost causing an accident to get to the "right" exit that satnav told them to take? The problems you're describing have nothing to do with satnav or no satnav, you're describing problems with people who lack critical thinking skills, which is dangerous regardless of how they're navigating.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I use it because it gives me the speed cameras.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

After several trips, I start remembering the route. I still use navigation for alternate routes because of unpredictable traffic, but if I drive a route using navigation enough times, I eventually memorize it.

Also, satnav is deterministic, it will get you to your destination accurately. AI is non-deterministic, it will guess the best way to your destination.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I always check the route first because sat navs are stupid. So yeah, I remember the route after a while.

[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I think this is a neurodiversity thing. Different people find different things challenging, and I've noticed within my circle of friends that navigational ability varies wildly. I would find it unlikely that I'd have trouble finding somewhere I went using satnav once, but I could also see someone else using it several times without it teaching them the route.

I imagine that in the same way some people will use AI and have it be a learning experience, while for others it will be a crutch.

It might be more of a problem for people who grow up with it though; less of them may find the need to develop the underlying skills.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Nav still requires you think critically to interpret the instructions in the context of the real world signs/roads/spatial setting. When you reach your destination you're either where you wanted to be or not. The fact checking is inherent to the result.

AI chats require an individual to be critical of their own volition. So most don't stress the brain when using it and plasticity never occurs, all the while they're absorbing near truths, guesses, and falsehoods.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Navigation can definitely do the same thing. My wife uses Google maps everywhere she goes, even to get to her own job or friends' houses.

One time her phone died on her way back home from somewhere she doesn't go very often, and she was crying by the time she found her way home. At the time we lived in a big city surrounded by a ring of highways - all she needed to do was drive toward the skyline and she'd hit that ring, but since she never thinks about what direction she's going or where she needs to turn, the thought of making those decisions herself never entered her brain. Instead she stopped at a gas station, charged her phone for 30 minutes, and used navigation to get back.

I've never been much into using apps like that, but now I specifically avoid them, so that I can keep my own ability to think about those kinds of things.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not suggesting using a maps app teaches route/wayfinding at all.

When it says to turn you still need to recognize the street direction, signs, signals, etc to decide you CAN turn that way and you also know when you've reached your destination because you're where you need to be. It's not probability and it can't lie to you without you knowing. You still have to be a competent driver.

AI chats don't have any indication of reasoning nor built-in fact checking. If you just want an answer you are not functionally obliged to check it, there is no built in safeguard.

In the same way navigation apps offload the skill of wayfinding, AI apps offload the skill of critical thinking.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 2 points 4 hours ago

Ah, yeah, that's fair. They degenerate some of your decision making, but not to the point where you can't drive at all. I think it's still probability-based in the end, but not to the same extent as AI, like how it's not going to tell you to drive onto a park trail the way AI might if it were in charge.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

How many phone numbers can you remember?

You used to be required to memorize a bare minimum number of phone numbers to survive. Now, you're lucky if people know their spouse's and their own.

Cognitive offloading results in an atrophy of the skill and retention. There is a similar phenomena with people who watch 1000 tutorial videos but never implement anything or do it themselves. This is not "deep learning", and its entertainment masquerading as productivity.

GPS is undeniably the same, and it's easily observable between generations. AI LLM search queries are already resulting in a disturbing amount of people accepting what is presented non-critically. These people are sadly atrophying whatever critical analysis skills they had to vet information and links.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Can someone please explain what this is saying? What is an A-Z?

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a reference to British road maps. They were ubiquitous before satnav became commonplace - everyone with a car had at least one copy stuffed in their glovebox.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A certain British road map, for London to be precise.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 hours ago

I think point by point directions. Like MapQuest.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago

I use sat nav to places I know how to get to all the time because google/apple know what roads are closed or have an accident, and I don't.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

After that many times you don't remember?

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I use GPS to find different routes, or help me work around problems.

If anything it's helped me understand an area better.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh, absolutely, when I use GPS I always turn off the voice, I am a big believer in applying airmenship to driving "aviate, communicate, navigate" is the correct priority when maneuvering any vehicle.

Aviate = drive the car
Communicate = use indicators, drive predictably
Navigate = use GPS/maps

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I used to get stressed out a lot trying to follow directions. Sometimes it was bad directions. Sometimes its just being unfamiliar to the area.

I don't get lost anymore and I don't stress about navigation anymore. I can develop mental maps faster and learn routes quickly. I can avoid traffic jams and I'm never late.

If you take the same route five times and you don't learn it, it's because you're not paying attention or have difficulty with that. Satnav isn't AI, it's a useful tool- a map in real time.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just a map in real time. Depending upon which mapping service you're using, it's also advertising. Do you think the local businesses it chooses to show you near you are accidental?

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, I must be stupid for using GPS to navigate

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No, but you are actively choosing to not use a part of your brain

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's fascinating how you've constructed an entire argument around nothing I ever said

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

I asked you a question and you implied that I was calling you stupid. There has been no argument

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago

I only use satnav in my local area so I can avoid traffic problems. Otherwise I'm still able to navigate without it

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I think there's quite a big difference between operating the car yourself based on GPS instructions and letting an LLM write your code, if that's what you mean. The equivalent would be asking the model only what to do, and then coding yourself based on its instructions.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

I've got satnav on constantly, mainly because my speedo is in km/h and I'm currently in the UK.

It's handy for traffic updates because people seem to like crashing so often these days

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

I have never used GPS with a voice, I just want a simple map to look at when I can, and after two three times, I know the route myself and don't need the GPS

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I tend to use GPS over and over for unfamiliar routes because usually I don't want to waste time getting lost. Also GPS let's me devote more brain power to other things, I don't multitask that well.

I used to use maps and I have a good sense of direction, so I'm sure I could do it again if needed.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 1 points 10 hours ago

I enjoy the adventure of trying to guess it right. Like if I haven't been somewhere in years, I'll try without checking a map and wait for my brain to say 'hey this left turn looks really familiar!'

On the times I do get lost I'm usually pretty close to the destination. It's fun

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Despite growing up without gps and being fully capable of driving without it, I have developed the same dependency as the OP.

However that lack of knowing where I'm going has been replaced with more attention to the cars around me rather than focusing on signs and future turns.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Man pay better attention to the road while you’re driving. After I drive a route once I can usually get back there months later without nav.