this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
8 points (72.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48864 readers
1083 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 12 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

I can't speak for every dog and every dog owner, though many anti-pit bull people will tell you they can and that they're all just waiting to bite the face off a child.

What I can say is that, of the pit bulls and pit bull mixes I know, they're lovable softies with their owners, and I know one (our neighbors) that I can say with confidence could not/would not hurt anyone or anything else, as even when another dog attacked him he would not fight back. This dog is in a house with multiple small children, numerous cats, chickens, a turkey, and over multiple years being their neighbor I've never heard of him being hostile towards any of them, he's always been a Very Good Boy.

What I believe it comes down to is that pit bulls are big, strong dogs, with strong jaws, and some people are neglectful owners who fail to socialize them and train them properly. A poorly trained and poorly socialized Yorkie will bite you all the same, it's just you can punt one like a football. People who are not prepared to train their dogs to behave appropriately -- which is a part of caring for them, just as important as grooming or feeding them if not even more important -- should not own dogs, full stop, irrespective of breed.

It is, however, much easier for other people to blame the dog, have the dog put down (and let me say, if they did something bad enough to earn an early departure across the rainbow bridge, rightly so), and then promptly forget about the owner who didn't bother to train them. The owner who will, then, almost certainly, get another dog to neglect.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 22 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

When you look at annual statistics of dog bite fatalities, pit bulls aren't just the #1 cause of dog bite deaths, they account for more deaths than all dog breeds COMBINED.

[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think this graphic should also be taking into account the number of owned dogs by breed, kinda like per capita. Because what if almost everyone owns pit bulls, and all the others are just outliers, then yeah, most attacks are by pit bulls because there’s more of them.

In my opinion, this would probably actually make pits look even worse, but it would actually be more representative of real data

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

A lot of mixed breeds are labeled as “pit bulls” which can skew the data as well. There’s several different types of “pit bulls” like American Staffordshire Terrier.

And as another commenter pointed out, this graph is coming from a biased source.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

According to Wikipedia (I understand the irony here) dogsbite dot org has been accused of publishing misleading and inaccurate information. However, pit bulls are terriers and terriers don't let go when they bite. Most terriers are small ratting dogs where this doesn't matter so much.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

When I was bit by a pit, I was in a fight with his uh, human. The dude was being a dick. The dog looked at me, looked at his "owner" and then lunged at me. I put up my left arm to block my face, thats where he caught me, in my upper arm. The guy jumpped on the dog, started punching it in the head (this guy was a complete moron) and he wouldnt let go.

I played dead. It was isntict, I dont know. After what felt like enterity, I just, took out a deep sigh, pushed all the air from me, went limp. the dog let go, the guy whos dog it was threw him in the bathroom and locked him in there, and I went to the hospital.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

My neighbors had a pit that hated other dogs. My sister brought her dog over and it escaped the backyard and jumped through an empty screen door to attack her. I was right there on the porch though and got the dog by the collar. As soon as I got it away from my sister's dog, it was wagging tail and happy face. Pit bulls are capable of intense focus when they have identified "prey." Most dog owners are not equipped to deal with the reality of training a dog like that. Luckily I only got grazed in that altercation.

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

But I whole heartedly believe that pit bulls by nature were meant to be farm dogs. And if you get one and raise them from birth in a good and loving home than bites won't happen. With this statistic did any owner say that yea I hurt my dog but only because he or she deserved it....etc etc etc. I didn't think so. No one man or animal is inherently mean. That is a learned behavior. And with all avenues of information getting to people and children is more likely going to be people who are mean. But born that way. Fuck No. Anyone feel free to prove me wrong for this discussion.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 47 minutes ago

It's pretty well known they were bred to be fighting dogs for blood sports. It doesn't mean they end up that way, but intervention is needed in places other breeds do not require it.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 31 minutes ago

Speaking from experience. I adopted a pitbull about 10 years ago. Spent countless hours training it, sent it to a daycare to make sure it was socialized.

Strike 1 was when he got kicked out of the daycare for fighting. Strike 2 was when out of nowhere he bit my friends dog. Strike 3 was when he turned on my border collie and nearly killed her. She was the dog he grew up with and spent every single day with. I had to beat him with a grill spatula to get him to let go, and I was bitten in the process.

My observation with the breed was that they have an instinct built into them and when it triggers they become possessed and they lose all control. Humans don't usually trigger it, but other pets tend to.

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

the fuck you mean "by nature"? man made dogs.

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world -1 points 39 minutes ago

Truly one of the worst takes I have ever read. What you "believe" means nothing.

Pitbulls were bred to be as aggressive and strong as possible. They are literally attack dogs made for fighting.

It's a shit breed that should be made illegal, period.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 4 points 51 minutes ago

The conversation is nuanced and long, but TLDR is that it is a breed which requires more training than other breeds. It's also important to note that many owners' version of training is ineffective or counter productive.

Pitbulls are highly energetic and much like great Danes, grow up physically much faster than mentally. They end up being an extremely powerful dog, chalk full of muscles, who crave constant attention and behave like a puppy. Well, puppies bite, and when a dog bites you, you tend to address it (give it attention). Compounding this, they're also not very smart and it takes a while to train them. Compounding this further, they have instincts like all dogs where pushing is met with resistance (something Cesar talks about a lot with food etiquette around dogs), and basically everything they do is exaggerated with their enormous energy.

Comparing them to a breed like a Labrador, the obliviousness, energy, strength, and attention needs are not the same.

They can be very good dogs, but effort was made to achieve that. There are dogs who have been bred to be home bodies and they much more naturally fall into a "good dog" category. Pitbulls were bred for dog fighting and blood sports. This is not a good start for family's first dog.

To put this into other terms. There are chickens who have been bred for cock fights. They can be good roosters, but watch your back and be ready to remove them if they attack your hens. That being said, predators beware. Different breeds have different specialties, if you want one for the look be very deliberate about what actions you are going to take to change the "natural outcome" of their behavior being the behavior you don't want.

pit bulls are just better equipped for certain things like using their uniquely powerful, clamping jaws to rip animals apart. pair this with the lowest common denominator human and you have a possible recipe for accident.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 53 minutes ago

Generally, it comes down to which statistics a "hater" believes. I'll refer to twain here about lies, damn lies and statistics, since numbers always seem so certain, but can be cooked.

It doesn't help that "pit bull" isn't a breed, it's a "type", which is vague as fuck all. There's something like a dozen breeds that get called pit bull, each with their own range of traits. What they have in common is an origin as fighting dogs, including those bred to fight bigger animals.

But if a dog just looks similar to any of those breeds, it's a pit bull, including mutts with no known ancestry in fighting breeds.

So, folks see a scary looking dog and that's that, they hate scary looking dogs.

Is the hate justified? IDGAF tbh. Assuming any of the statistics are accurate and applicable, I can understand wanting to limit breeding more, as well as the strict side of enforced euthanasia once a dog turns aggro. But with the vagueness of what gets counted as a pit bull in those stats, and the cherry picking that goes on in such debates, I can't work up any emotional response to the subject.

But that's why the hate. They're scary looking dogs, and when a dog that looks like they tend to look attacks, it'll fuck its target up worse than something like a Chihuahua or poodle. That much is fact, a big muscular dog with strong jaws can fuck shit up.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I imagine this may become a contentious thread, but one book I've partially read and enjoyed (and now remember I need to go back and finish) is Pit Bull: The Battle Over an American Icon by Bronwen Dickey.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I dont hate putbulls, I am however weary of them, because I was bit by one at 24.. I didnt blame the dog, but its human countetpart(s).

My sisters Pug used to bite people, I do hate pugs, for many reasons, as I dont think they should exsist, the poor things.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Hey, not trying to be annoying. I see this error a lot, "weary" should probably be "wary" if you are implying you're cautious of them because you were bitten, "weary" is like tired of them.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

Pitbulls are the hollow points of the dog world. There is nothing wrong with them per se but the consequences of one being misused are so much worse.

Get bitten by a lab or a Yorkie and it's not so bad. Pits have the bite strength of an alligator and the instinct to hold on, so if you try to pull free or shake loose you are losing muscle or maybe a limb.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 25 minutes ago

What has four legs and an arm?

A Pit Bull in a playground.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Mostly just the new breed to gang up on. It's made worse because while statistically they are being shown as having higher bite percentages, there is some skew because of miscategorized breeds that get lumped together under the unofficial breed of "pit bull". There are also many more of them than other breeds. Partly because of being en vogue and partly again because multiple breeds are being lumped together.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Why take on the hassle of a pit bull? Just get a Labrador or a poodle, there are so many easy going dogs. Easier to insure as well. Bit of a needless conversation.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 9 points 1 hour ago

Lol, Labradors are not easy dogs. They are very friendly, but they need a lot of outlet for their boundless energy and constant direction or they become misbehaved. Every other poodle I ever met was undertrained and misbehaved too.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Because sometimes pit bulls need rescuing. We picked one up wandering the side of the road who turned out to be the absolute sweetest and most loving creature we’ve ever known. We walked him and our other dog one morning and a little neighbor dog came running (stupidly) up to attack. Our other dog just spiked this dog’s face into the sidewalk and proceeded to fight back while the pibble just got excited about the new friend.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You gotta be careful though, The one who bit me was a rescue. The guy who took him in was a complete moron entitled asshole, and I ended up getting bit due to this dudes negligence.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 4 points 57 minutes ago

Sure, don’t mess with any kind of strange dog, but in my opinion that’s the owner’s fault. That idiot probably has firearms too.