this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
630 points (95.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47533 readers
906 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This design looks so cheap to me, it's just a bunch of random covers, there is no information about the movies presented in any way, the covers are way too big and take up an inordinate amount of space and there is nothing breaking up sections, design is just so fucking dumb now, fuck mobile

rant over πŸ˜…

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 152 points 1 month ago (3 children)

UI's for movie streaming services are not designed to help you find something to watch. They are designed to keep you "engaged", which means in the platform and not realizing that the pool of actually interesting things is about as deep as a puddle. Everything about streaming sites' design is user hostile and this is a classic example of that.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Isn't Jellyfin the same design as all the streaming platform and they have nothing to gain for keeping you engaged?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 77 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Yeah but they don't have highly paid UX design teams, so they're probably just copying design choices on the basis that they're trying to offer people a similar experience they can own.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago

Also, it's FOSS so you can always make your own skin/theme.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Almost, but it has movie titles under the poster/cover and usually pulls the actual movie covers.

Once you click into it, it gives a shitton of detail about the movie.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Once you click into it, it gives a shitton of detail about the movie.

Is this not the case with netflix/hbo? Sorry i never actually used any streaming service before other than Jellyfin so i don't understand what is the issue here

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two things off the top of my head:

  • Jellyfin displays ratings from RT (and opencritic maybe?), while Netflix has stopped displaying their own user ratings years ago.

  • Jellyfin displays the full cast and crew. When you click an actor, director,... it shows you other media where they appear, even individual episodes. Netflix has none of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Jellyfin has like six different view types to pick from, including one that doesn't even show images. And almost all the others show the title always visible below the preview image.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I'm so here for this.

It's genuinely infuriating to see a hundred years of movie poster art evolution discarded. It's the first part of a movie's artistic statement you ever see, and it gets summarily tossed in the trash so that Netflix's internal overworked engagement metrics team can spend 2 minutes grabbing random shots of different stars in the film, slap single-color generic font text all over it, and target twelve versions to different demographics to try to get more clicks.

It's even worse when I tell this to someone and they're like, "I don't really notice."

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh my goodness thank you I finally feel vindicated like no one around me ever mentions anything about it, I do need some more friends lol, but yeah as someone who does design and appreciates good design and knows what a hell creatives put ourselves through to go through the process of making something people love and then it all gets reduced to garbage like this

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

My local movie theater in the heart of downtown has taken down all the movie posters outside the entrance and replaced them with a single screen that only shows ads for overpriced popcorn "deals".

Before, anyone walking by knew which movies were currently playing; now, all they know is just how outrageously expensive the popcorn is.

I haven't been to that theater since.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Yeah, I guess I should. I just can't quite understand how anyone could fail to realize how absurd it is for a movie theater to use its most prominent advertising space not for promoting its movie lineup, but for food offerings.

To me, this strongly suggests that this movie theaterβ€”which is part of a large chainβ€”now sees its main product as food rather than movies.

I have absolutely no sympathy for that, and I can only applaud it when a company like that loses customers because of its own idiocy.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Movie theaters main products has always been food.

Movie theaters have never made money off the movies they show, they make their money off the food they sell. It has been that way for at least 50 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Web/UI design in general has sucked for at least 14 years now. Everything is spaced too far apart and text/images are too big. Icons are used for critical functionality instead of words. Pointless animations and gradients slow everything down for no reason.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mobile first! MoBiLE FiRsT!!!

What that?

AI?

AI FiRst!!

load more comments (1 replies)

The thing that drives me the craziest is when a long title or sentence or whatever is just truncated with ellipses, even when there is ENORMOUS blank white space around it that would easily allow the whole thing to be shown with word-wrapping. Youtube shorts is the most egregious example of this, and they recently managed to make it even worse. It used to be that you could open up the comments for a short and that would make the entire long title readable, but they "fixed" that so it stays ellipsized even then.

The app I use at work to clock in and out ellipsizes my own name halfway through my middle name, and it could be easily fixed by just stretching the control that displays the name all the way to each edge. I used to be a mobile app developer and I know exactly why this happens: the UI designer uses a bogus short name like "Bob Smith" on the original design document and the developer who implements it puts in a control just big enough for that. I used to encounter this kind of thing and I would fix it with common sense, and then the UI designer would get mad and insist that my fix be reverted, even though that resulted in something that couldn't display the information properly.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And make sure everything you mouseover trying to get a blurb or something instead just jumps around like a Jack Russell terrier trying to grab your attention. I fucking hate having to find a place to park my mouse so it isn't autoplaying some bullshit I have no interest in.

[–] arran4@aussie.zone 14 points 1 month ago

Or worse finding a space where something doesn't auto play but scroll does work (when on a computer.)

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everything about using the internet and its various β€œservices” has turned to absolute garbage in the last 15 years.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's what happens when you let marketing dickheads be in charge of everything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's all about driving metrics now. If people need to click on/select a movie to see more about it then that adds numbers to page views and increases time spent in the app. They can also see who and how many do or don't watch a movie after clicking on it to further drive their algorithms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LucidiaDiamond@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (12 children)

It’s part of the infuriating trend on removing all words from UIs. God forbid the kids learn how to read a movie title. Using modern apps means navigating a never ending stream of hieroglyphs. The β€œsave”, β€œload”, β€œnew”, β€œshare” buttons are long gone; replaced with an ever changing series of symbols.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What difference are you seeing that I'm not?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I think the main complaint is that your examples show detail about the movie, not just a close up of someone's face

For example jaws has a giant shark attacking a person. Compare that to a close up of Bane's face. You might not even realize it's a batman movie of you aren't familiar with it already.

Star wars poster shows space ships and laser sword.

Many movie posters are just the main characters now with head shots vs trying to tell a story.

I don't full agree with the op, just my interpretation of what I think they are complaining about

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought it was about the website design as opposed to the posters. Like why dont you get a small infobox for every movie with name, runtime, age-rating, plotsummary... Instead its just the posters

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm finding myself having to guide people through UIs that have random symbols instead of an obvious word that says what it does.

It's annoying and getting worse.

You can easily use a word button to point to a side out menu with words, all language localised, that will actually make sense to a user instead of causing a tech anxiety attack!

I shouldn't have to scout and translate a UI for someone. If there's one bright side to all the AI being pushed at users is that it's at least able to communicate with actual text, and usually wants to be user-friendly instead of hostile.

[–] Javi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago


The future begins to look more and more like idiocracy everyday.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago

And then combined it with thumbnails that change all the time because of A/B testing, which makes things even harder to recognize at a glance.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I mean, if they could let you click on the picture and it "flips" over and then there's some info and a few stills from the movie... This was how Video Rental stores worked for years.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Click on a cover to get more info.

Honestly it feels a bit like browsing a shelf of books or DvD boxes or something. It certainly could have some improvements but I don’t think this is that bad.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The large cover design isn't even the worst bit, it's how hard it is to find concrete genre categories in a lot of these streaming apps. You'd have a bunch of overlapping categories like most popular whatever in whereever and so on, they quite literally hide the option to just go to movies -> genre -> list everything in some apps (Netflix was hard to find at some point).

Now I just pirate whatever old movies come to mind and stuff them in Jellyfin. Right now it's Minority Report. Up next... Hmm I downloaded man from U.N.C.L.E the other day, might watch that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yup. And when you click on that, it will probably start playing and not showing any information.

Yea it kinda goes to a page with a random crappy screenshot from the movie that doesn't really say anything, and a really bad synopsis lol. I dunno if they are like, going to lock away all the information soon or what

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

This along with the changes to de-emphasize things like watch lists or even "continue watching" is basically the providers seeing how much they can influence users to watch what the provider wants instead of trying to cater to the users. If they find that people rarely navigate away from whatever 'top 10' or 'for you' suggestions, well, that means they have a great deal of freedom to only provide what is convenient for them and still get most of their revenue.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Doesn't piss me off as much as media players that show you what happens in the next episode as it's loading

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

I need to search movies and stuff like a database, not algorithmically from the covers in a database. I need more detail than that.

Social media told me gradeschoolers can't read now. I guess they don't want all those nonsense symbols everywhere.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Unpopular opinion: I want as little information as possible before watching a movie. At the other end of the spectrum, we have trailers which basically spoil the whole film. The only information I want about a movie is whether it's interesting, which I will get from audience sentiment online, and the only information I really need is the title.

Any additional information is either irrelevant to the movie experience, or a spoiler. Yeah I'm a weird little freak, and I like low-information posters. It's better than posters which give away too much

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

I guess this should incentivize me to click them?

Well, it doesn't. It's just noise i ignore, because there's too much of it in the net anyway.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Even if this is to drive engagement by clicking on items to gauge interest and collect metrics, I still don't see how that's more important than simply counting views and making an interface that's simple and pleasurable to use. I guess maybe the lack of proper market competition would allow this? This would be enough for me to leave the platform. (I'm running Jellyfin anyway.)

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί