this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
453 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

72414 readers
3166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year, China generated 834 terawatt-hours of solar power.

Which is more than the G7 countries generated, and more than the US and EU combined. In fact the only country group that generates more solar power than China is the OECD, all 38 countries of it.

Data: @ember-energy.org

Source: https://bsky.app/profile/nathanielbullard.com/post/3lsbbsg6ohk2j

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (36 children)

Good on them. The earlier they can shut down those coal plants, the better.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They‘ll keep building more coal power plants in the global south and export coal. There‘s a lot of money to be made.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They're also actually still building more coal power in mainland China.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Nice I love seeing China Greenwashing get reposted. Remember that China is 3x the size of the EU so them having 3x the solar power is a stupid comparison. China also continues to increase coal generation by more than renewables. China is only %27 renewables while the EU is 47%. China is 17% of the world and almost 40% of the emissions.

OECD countries are actually working on emission reduction instead of china which continue to increase emissions with absolute no signs of stopping. They have missed every single renewable target and goal they're set. But dont worry im sure they will stop building more coal plants in 2030, im sure it wont be to late by then.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

China also continues to increase coal generation by more than renewables.

I don't believe this:

https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/china/

In 2024, China approved 66.7GW of new coal-fired capacity, started construction on 94.5GW of coal power projects

Even if you add these 2 together and pretend they were finished the same year it's not even close to:

China’s renewable energy sector made remarkable progress in 2024, adding 356 gigawatts (GW) of wind and solar capacity

https://theasialive.com/chinas-energy-production-coal-and-renewables-locked-in-competition-amid-clean-energy-boom/2025/02/14/

They have missed every single renewable target and goal they’re set.

I don't believe this is true either unless you are referring to some other targets?

In 2020, China set a goal to install at least 1,200 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind power by 2030. By the end of 2024, China had already surpassed this target, reaching this milestone 6 years ahead of schedule. This was made possible by aggressive investments, government policies, and a surge in solar and wind installations.

China’s solar capacity grew by an incredible 45.2% in 2024, adding 277 GW. Wind capacity also saw a strong increase of 18%, with an additional 80 GW installed. Overall, total power generation capacity rose by 14.6% in 2024, driven mainly by renewables.

https://carboncredits.com/chinas-renewable-energy-boom-a-record-breaking-shift-or-still-chained-to-coal/

China is only %27 renewables while the EU is 47%.

Don't worry, just like everything else I'm sure that will flip in the future

Europe has plenty of money apparently to suddenly:

NATO leaders on Wednesday confirmed their commitment to more than double defence spending by 2035 banding words like "crucial", "momentous" and "quantum leap"

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/06/25/defence-spend-to-5-of-gdp-ukraine-russia-the-key-takeaways-from-the-nato-summit

Just why does it take an emergency to make some proper progress:

Global energy storage owner-operator BW ESS and Spanish energy storage developer Ibersun say a new joint venture is intended to build eight four-hour battery projects across the country, with a combined capacity of 2.2 GW, 8.8 GWh.

https://reneweconomy.com.au/no-time-to-waste-huge-big-battery-plans-unveiled-for-spain-as-accusations-traded-over-blackout/

Where will the batteries be made I wonder?

On top of this energy prices in the EU are ridiculous and for some reason they still can't get off the gas, which leads to an unreal point of France giving more money to Russia for gas than in aid to Ukraine, so they have high energy prices and they're funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine and their companies and manufacturing are leaving them... to go to China...

https://aussie.zone/comment/17361559

But I appreciate your scepticism (I gave your post an upvote because China does sometimes get a little bit too much credit), they are the worlds top producer of CO2 by FAR but I do want to address

Greenwashing

This is something I've wanted for a while:

It requires EU importers to pay a levy corresponding to the embedded carbon emissions in 303 emission-intensive products

https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/what-to-expect-from-the-eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_719d2ff9-en.html

I've long disliked that places like the EU and the rest of the west can export their dirty manufacturing over to China where companies take advantage of lax or no environmental regulations, it's a false economy and makes the west look a whole lot greener and cleaner than it would if we were manufacturing what we used back at home

China has Apple by the balls’: How the rising superpower captured the tech giant

https://www.smh.com.au/national/china-has-apple-by-the-balls-how-the-rising-superpower-captured-the-tech-giant-20250609-p5m5z1.html

edit: boy I sure do love to procrastinate and talk about energy and co2 instead of studying :|

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

edit: boy I sure do love to procrastinate and talk about energy and co2 instead of studying :|

I feel the same way, but I had to actually focus on real life over the weekend instead of combing through the energy reports. I will start by saying that its very likely that 2024 stats are significantly more in favor of strong renewable growth but I also couldnt find a csv of data on ember-energy so i couldnt look at the actual numbers. The major energy reports I normally go by dont seem to have included 2024 data yet. Its likely that even in 2024 non renewables still increased more than renewables even though china claims that renewables were 80% of the growth I will explain below why this has previously been the case.

China also continues to increase coal generation by more than renewables.

China loves this stat and its a good stat but its a bit misleading, these show renewable energy as a % of total power which is relative instead of absolute. Why this is important is because it allows china to brag about increasing renewables while still massively increasing non renewables.

Year 2022: Renewable = 8114 TWh | Non-renewable = 36401 TWh | % renewables = 18.2% From Energy Institute's world review

Year 2023: Renewable = 8719 TWh | Non-renewable = 38708 TWh | % renewables = 18.3%

Renewable energy increase was 605 TWh and Non-renewable was 2307 TWh

There is another stat that these reports normally parade around. Its % increase of a specific energy type. (these stats are made up cause i could be fucked finding an example article of a claim) They will say something like solar went from 600gw to 1000 thats a 66% increase this year and coal only increased 40% except coal is 3600gw to 6400.

Maybe I'm wrong and if so i'd love for someone smarter than me to correct me.

They have missed every single renewable target and goal they’re set.

China does this thing where they go to climate meetings and agree on world goals like 13% energy intensity reduction and carbon intensity reduction. They then go back home and broadcast random goals like adding x amount of solar or carbon peak by x year. These are no climate targets, these are personal targets from the CCP that even if achieved (the carbon peak 1000% wont be) are no where close to what is required to meet their climate goals.

https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/international-issues/china-is-missing-key-climate-targets/

Europe has plenty of money apparently to suddenly double defense spending OVER 10 YEARS

I'm not sure how european defense spending is relevant considering china's defense spending has also more than doubled in the last few years and is nearing the US

Where will the batteries be made I wonder?

Prehaps they would be made in a country with environmental and labour laws if governments legislated properly to prevent companies outsourcing manufacturing. However this doesnt absolve china. China isnt being forced at Gunpoint to produce these goods with low labour regulation and low environmental regulation.

energy prices in the EU are ridiculous

Can someone actually point out to me where this comes from? Even when I look up the peak spike of germany Energy prices it doesnt seem that bad. At the end of the day energy is a small % of EU household spending and ill think that until i see otherwise.

It requires EU importers to pay a levy corresponding to the embedded carbon emissions in 303 emission-intensive products

This would be great, it would have been greater 10 years ago. But the best time to act was yesterday and the 2nd best time is today so i'd be happy to see something like this implemented although I dont know how effective it would be since manufacturing competitiveness is no where close anymore.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They will say something like solar went from 600gw to 1000 thats a 66% increase this year and coal only increased 40% except coal is 3600gw to 6400.

Hrmmmm, maybe these numbers are outdated? Based on this coal and gas are down:

In Q1 2025, solar generation rose 48% compared to the same period in 2024. Solar power reached 254 TWh, making up 10% of total electricity. This was the largest increase among all clean energy sources.

Coal-fired electricity dropped by 4%, falling to 1,421 TWh.

Gas-fired power also went down by 4%, reaching 67 TWh

https://carboncredits.com/china-sets-clean-energy-record-in-early-2025-with-951-tw/

are no where close to what is required to meet their climate goals

Which ones in particular are you talking about?

Trump signs executive order directing US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement — again

https://apnews.com/article/trump-paris-agreement-climate-change-788907bb89fe307a964be757313cdfb0

China vowed on Tuesday to continue participating in two cornerstone multinational arrangements -- the World Health Organization and Paris climate accord -- after newly sworn-in US President Donald Trump ordered withdrawals from them.

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250121-china-says-committed-to-who-paris-climate-deal-after-us-pulls-out

What's that saying? You hate it when the person you hate is doing good? I can't remember what it is

I can't fault them for what they're doing at the moment, even if they are run by an evil dictatorship and do pollute the most

I’m not sure how european defense spending is relevant

It suggests there is money available in the bank to fund solar/wind/battery, but instead they are preparing for? something? what? who knows. France can make a fighter jet at home but not solar panels apparently.

Prehaps they would be made in a country with environmental and labour laws if governments legislated properly to prevent companies outsourcing manufacturing. However this doesnt absolve china. China isnt being forced at Gunpoint to produce these goods with low labour regulation and low environmental regulation.

You're right, it doesn't absolve china, and I avoid purchasing things from them wherever possible, my solar panels and EV were made in South Korea, my home battery was made in Germany, there are only a few things in my house made in China, most of them I got second hand but unfortunately there is no escaping the giant of manufacturing.

With that said it's one thing for me to sit here and tut tut at China, but I realise I am not most people, the most clearest example is the extreme anti-ai, anti-billionaire bias on this platform, in real life most people don't give a fuck, they love Amazon/Microsoft/Google/Apple etc, they can't go a day without them.

So I consider myself a realist, if you want people to buy your stuff then you will need to make the conditions possible for them to WANT to buy your stuff, not out of some moral lecture and Europe isn't doing that, if we look at energy prices:

Can someone actually point out to me where this comes from? ... At the end of the day energy is a small % of EU household spending

I was looking at corporate/business energy use:

Major European companies are already moving to cut costs and retain their competitive edge.

For example, Thyssenkrupp, Germany’s largest steelmaker, said on Monday it would slash 11,000 jobs in its steel division by 2030, in a major corporate reshuffle.

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/High-Energy-Costs-Continue-to-Plague-European-Industry.html

Prices have since fallen but are still high compared to other countries.

A poll by Germany's DIHK Chambers of Industry and Commerce of around 3,300 companies showed that 37% were considering cutting production or moving abroad, up from 31% last year and 16% in 2022.

For energy-intensive industrial firms some 45% of companies were mulling slashing output or relocation, the survey showed.

"The trust of the German economy in energy policy is severely damaged," Achim Dercks, DIHK deputy chief executive said, adding that the government had not succeeded in providing companies with a perspective for reliable and affordable energy supply.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/more-german-companies-mull-relocation-due-high-energy-prices-survey-2024-08-01/

I've seen nothing to suggest energy prices in the EU are SO cheap that it's worth moving manufacturing TO Europe, and this is what annoys me the most.

I've pointed this out before but they have an excellent report on the issues:

https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/97e481fd-2dc3-412d-be4c-f152a8232961_en?filename=The+future+of+European+competitiveness+_+A+competitiveness+strategy+for+Europe.pdf

Then they put out this Competitive Compass:

https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/competitiveness-compass_en

But tbh every week in the EU it seems like they are chasing after some other goal.

This would be great, it would have been greater 10 years ago.

Agreed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 week ago

While everyone else is paying the costs that come with environmental regulation china is exploiting it and getting celebrated for it. Its insane what a few dollars can do to change peoples minds on a topic.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

China is 17% of the world and almost 40% of the emissions.

Deceiving metrics. What percentage of world PPP GDP is China? China doesn't pollute due to its population, it pollutes because it's the industrial hub of the world. How comfortable of you to sit in your office and import Chinese products disregarding the effect of that in the pollution metrics of your country and China.

China is only %27 renewables while the EU is 47%

And how long did China take to develop? What are the cumulative CO2 emissions of China vs those of the US or Europe? Furthermore: where are the solar panels that Europe uses manufactured? Europe may have a blossoming wind industry, but photovoltaics are almost entirely Chinese.

What a chauvinistic and anti-Chinese point of view. BTW, you got completely proven wrong on China building more coal than renewables, you're just spitting disinformation.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago

you're retarded

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

3 times as much solar as the EU.

Has 3 times the population.

🤷

They are using 50% of the world's coal though, so maybe let's not start tugging each other off just yet.

[–] ammonium@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last year China installed more solar than the rest of the world combined, but they have less than 1/5th of the worldpopulation 🤷

There are lot's of things you can criticize China about, their commitment to renewable energy isn't one of them.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They were also responsible for 95% of the world's new coal construction (2023). With just 1/5th of the world population.

I'll give them props for solar. They build a lot of it, and thanks to us outsourcing practically everything to China over the last few decades, they build most of our solar as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You sound like all the right-wing politicians the world over who don't want to implement zero carbon solutions because "China still burn coal".

We're on a sinking ship and you're complaining that you don't like the colour of the life raft.

If China was the only country in the world that burned coal, but they exclusively burned coal, and everybody else was on solar panels the world would still be an infinitely better place and it is right now. Not doing something just because other people also aren't doing it just ensures that nobody does anything.

[–] Philamand@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think that you misunderstood his comment. He's not criticizing solar energy, he's calling out China's green washing as they have the same solar production per Capita than Europe but they have way more coal production per Capita than Europe.

A right wing politician would throw a fit about how solar energy is dangerous and make kids trans.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] alehel@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm guessing a lot of that coal is being used to feed westerners urge to buy more crap we don't need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

People talk about China's energy use like it's not* their* energy use. They used that power to produce the stupid shit that you bought, dumbass. You're responsible for that energy use, despite it being generated in China.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is legit true IDK why you're getting downvoted. Just because it doesn't show on US energy usage, every time you buy stupid shit you don't need like an automatic corn dog maker or a taco holder shaped like a sombrero that holds a shot glass in the middle, that has a real cost in terms of CO2 and that is done in China.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's a bit hard to believe, but the vast majority of China's manufacturing is consumed in China. They're actually not that export oriented compared to other countries like Germany or Japan, it's just the scale that makes them such an export juggernaut. The flip side of this is that most of the energy use is also actually China's own energy use.

And China's energy use is increasing simply because its people are getting richer and consuming more. Based on this, I don't think China is the main concern. There are lots more developing countries that will likewise use more energy as they develop. China's green transition seems to be going full tilt, but I'm not sure those other countries can transition as quickly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zapzap@lemmings.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good for China on that!

To add some perspective, China is about 2 and a quarter times as large as the EU nations, and according to currentresults.com seems to get a bit more sunshine than the EU does. So the difference isn't quite as stark as this post makes it seem.

But still, it's good that China is taking solar power seriously. I didn't realize they were doing that well.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 1 week ago (16 children)

China are the worlds biggest coal producer and consumer, started building like 100GW of coal power plants last year alone, and are increasing their use of coal every single year.

People getting excited about china's massive solar power generation are hilarious. Basically unless china stop using coal, the rest of the world being completely net-zero is irrelevant.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Cool if true, but the source seemed to be bluesky soooo it's a big gain of salt

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 22 points 1 week ago

Solar panels don't work as well with greysky.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah I think by "source" they just mean they're just giving credit to the bsky post they got the graph from, the data seems to be from a green energy transition thinktank. No idea if you'd put more stock in ember-energy.org/, so make of that what you will 🤷‍♂️

From the website:

Data into action

Open data and intelligent policy analysis to unlock a clean, electrified energy future

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that's where I ended up and didn't know what to do with them. I guess I trust them as much as any unknown internet source

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's great that they are creating that much. They have the largest incentive too, the U.S. second. The G7 they refer to (U.S. U.K. Japan Germany France Italy Canada) used a total of ~7 PWh of electricity in 2023. China used ~9 PWh.

Hopefully the G7 starts catching up. Chinas form of government puts their long term expendetures into play when figuring out where to invest as they have a monetary stake in how much it costs to produce the electricity.

In countries like the U.S. we see companies who have large investments in oil, coal, and such trying to manipulate the transition because they didn't have the investments already in place with alternative energy sources. The U.S. government has no money "invested" per say, so long term they don't care that it costs more during the transition as those profits are made by the companies. The old oil tycoons will milk every penny under the attitude "I got mine.". Then they'll die, and we will hope some companies have transitions in place that bring low cost efficient renewable systems long term

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

🤔 it was made into fancy graphs by the guy on Bluesky but the data was from ember-energy.org who are well known for supplying renewable stats

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

to be fair, they have about 3x the population too. but nonetheless good to see that they are moving fast. dictatorship works faster when it comes to regulation ¯_(ツ)_/¯ :)

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It's not about regulation. China has almost the complete photovoltaic production of the world. Essentially all panels installed in the rest of the world are also Chinese. It's about a smart government knowing which technologies to pursue, instead of things like the Spanish "sun tax" of the 2010s that killed whatever solar industry there might have been in the sunniest country in Europe.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The dictatorship is fast is a lure, it's actually not useful, as they run in the direction of the dictator but usually doesn't adjust or stop in time. Sometimes you see something good coming out if it, but you shouldn't forget all the bad things they do too.

That said, I hope we'll have enough solar for everyone in a decade or so!

[–] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This has been going on for years and will continue.

China really really really needs a robust and diverse energy infrastructure. Industry needs huge amounts of energy. AI needs huge amounts of energy. The military needs huge amounts of energy.

Coal is unreliable and dirty. Oil can be blocked at the Straight of Malacca and a few pipelines.

China is also the world’s factory. They own the entire logistics chain for producing renewable generators; from raw materials to final assembly. They have all the infrastructure to not only build solar panels and wind turbines at scale, they’ve scaled up building the machines that build them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Amazing how fast you can build stuff when there's safety standards, no environmental regulations, no labour rights and the government can expropriate property without a time consuming legal process!

Though I think a prefer living in a country where I have rights even if it takes a bit longer to build stuff.

[–] tresspass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We tried getting rid of environmental regulations, safety standards, labour rights, etc. in America and I'm still waiting for when stuff gets built faster... At least the government can't expropriate property! oh wait... Well at least we still have our rights? oh wait...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

Gotta love how you jump to the whataboutism when it comes to good China news. "Yeah sure, they may be saving the environment by going solar, but what about... Uh... Environmental regulation?"

Like, mate, manufacturing 90% of the world's photovoltaics is the best thing you can environmentally do.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 6 points 1 week ago

Like america but more competent

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah I tracked it back to that, but couldn't find the graph shown and had no knowledge of the ember.

Having said that, I'm all for the green revolution and would love to see it go harder. As a petrol head the idea of guilt free fuel is like a holy grail

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

It is strategic necessity for China for energy security and for their own environment. Their predominant source of electricity has been coal which they have abundant of but is polluting the air they breathe. Does anyone recall the issues they had at Beijing Olympics? They have insufficient sources of oil and gas domestically. Alternative energy sources are their best domestic source of energy.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (18 children)

They also expanded coal power, roads, and removed their population limiting policies, though. They produce about 3 times as much CO2 per person as India, Indonesia, and many South American nations, likely many nations in Africa as well but theres a lot of missing data.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›