this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
486 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

89311 readers
3264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 82 points 2 months ago (3 children)

“Normally what would happen… is like one cop would have heard that, flip on the blue lights, race down there… and someone’s about to die,” [Flock CEO Garrett] Langley explained, describing a case in which a woman called 911 on a man, who later turned out to be holding a lighter, not a gun, as initially suspected. “Instead, they launch the drone.”

Langley claimed that “we have thousands and thousands of stories like that where communities are safer now with our drones. They’re safer with our cameras.”

That's your prime example of a community becoming safer? The cops droning a mf because he lit a cigarette and some Karen panicked? You're the CEO of the fucking company with like the worst PR and you say this shit.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 28 points 2 months ago

"We know cops are racist so we've lessened their load by making our drones racist too."

"Why are they not clapping"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Are they going to follow FAA rules then or just do whatever they want and kill people every now and then when they crash/fall out of the sky?

[–] beveradb@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, they'll do whatever they want and kill people deliberately, frequently, whenever they say something which disagrees with the dictatorship state definition of truth. Give it a decade

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Oh boy. Ain't gonna take that long.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How long can these even stay airborn? This is a REALLY stupid idea.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, that's one of the easier problems to solve. Basically make them a Roomba that has a set flight plan where it returns to its charging station at the end, and have enough that they can swap out and still keep coverage.

And depending on how it's made, powerless gliding is an option. They already use gliders in some places for speed limit enforcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well when they crash the company needs to replace the whole drone, so they are probably going to try to avoid that when possible.

That said, they should have to obey faa regs, but while the laws for private use are pretty clear, the commercial use regulations are layered and sort of in flux. Major operators are always pushing to have laws adjusted, and because leadership in the US is generally overly supportive of big business, those changes often go into place.

In other words, there ARE laws, but you know, it's the US, so they can probably change them.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I think this will depend less on the FAA and more on local jurisdiction. the FAA doesn't really have that much restrictions in place for low altitude drones (< 400 ft) they require it to be registered due to commercial but, the 2026 modifications for usage removed a lot of the safety barriers and controls that were in place for them. Now it's basically as long as its registered and the lights are bright enough to be seen, it's allowed unless there's a local law forbidding it.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't there an fcc rule about drones needing to be in the line of sight of the operator

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes. They are also not allowed to be over people (including traffic) unless it's just to pass over to move to another area with no people (not allowed to continuously pass over people) unless they are below a certain, very low, weight. I think only one drone fits that category last I checked.

I have my commercial drone license but quit the job that required it so I am a little rusty on the rules

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Frankly, what a bunch of fucking creeps. Does no one else find it weird that they’re hellbent on spying on people? If it weren’t for the government we’d probably lock up these fucking psychos.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 26 points 2 months ago

Next week having closed courtains will be illegal. What's going on in there? Probably something suspicious! Why is your bathroom window frosted?!

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago

I have no doubt this is thiel's work. He needs the data for his surveillance machine.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

They will go down kicking and screaming. A company like flock has tons of investor capital. That results in a board putting tons of pressure on executive leadership. They will never go "oops nevermind this was a bad idea". It's just a other front in the class war against the billionaire Epstein class.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I forgot that there was a sport meant to help train you for shooting drones out of the sky

[–] Sunnshine@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Everyone told you shooting skeet was a useless hobby.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago

In other news, falconry has become unexpectedly popular.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I've been waiting for this for a long time. Drones are cheap. Automating their flight is a super solved problem. At some point every cop car will have a drone on demand that can pop out and follow. They'll launch some slow movers with big blades and just have them patrol. 30-40 minute flights.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Skeet shooting: city edition

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The maximum viable elevation that you can hit a target at with a shotgun is ~40m, or ~55m with a very tight choke. Drones can comfortably operate much higher than that. I guess it might work from the roof of a skyscraper though.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

time to deploy our own counter-drone drones

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It should be legal to destroy corpo property.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It is if you ask me.

[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

According to my laws, this is not forbidden.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

one thing I learned is that everything is legal as long as you don't get caught.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Once this becomes the norm next podcast is "What if we put small tasers on the drones? Our communities become much safer!". And then handguns etc...

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

And when they get hacked, people will be able to do mass shootings from the comfort of their own homes. That's what I call progress!

[–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 11 points 2 months ago

No body gonna be driving when the markets crash.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A handful in the sky is still a lot less useful than the thousands on the ground. We need them off the streets and then we can deal with the drones.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

While I agree that the street-level cameras should urgently be taken care of, don't underestimate what a stationary aerial drone can do over a couple of hours.

Listen to Radiolab's Eye in the Sky episode. Think of the possibilities that have opened up because of drone tech in the 10 years since it first aired (and the 20 years since the tech was used in Iraq). It's truly frightening what these drones will be able to accomplish once they are in place.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 5 points 2 months ago

I don't think sending a couple drones to canvas a city grid from the sky would count as less useful. In fact, it'd be a lot faster than strapping a camera to a truck/car. Really depends how they are used. But worst case scenario, both drones and fixed cameras work in conjunction, which they obviously would.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bold move in a nation that treats firearms target practice as a sport.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

First thing I thought of was "TARGET PRACTICE!"

[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Can we use jammers against them perhaps?

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of americans already have them. I'm unfamiliar with them, but they've all got names like dezziteegoo and smiffunwessun.

[–] Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Fun as it may be to shoot them out of the sky, that's not super feasible in urban or suburban areas. Don't want to risk the possibility of the bullet hitting someone on the way down and the neighbors probably wouldn't appreciate the gunshots

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Converting a little microwave oven to a homemade jammer gun never hurt anyone (it has).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

These guys really don't get the message eh?

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, if it hovers, a laser to a camera is a known thing...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

wonder how hard it is to hit those...

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Probably pretty easy with a shotgun

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_VNnkB-i54

Depending on the drone, might be harder than I initially thought

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] vane@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

They're just copying Chinese ideas, don't they ?

[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The drone on the thumbnail looks like the german flag!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›