this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
167 points (95.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41112 readers
1418 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was once talking with one of my classmates and he said that in the future, there will be universal basic income implemented by entire world. I was not convinced at that time and thought he is just being stupid but given the layoffs happening and massive amount of unemployment, I am thinking about this possibility. What do you say?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

UBI is the future if we are allowed peace.

WW3 in an apocalyptic scale is much more likely. Don't need to feed the obsolete peasants if they're all dead.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, but not in the way we envision it.

Wealth inequality will increase. Drastically. There will be a small group of people owning basically everything. But they still need cheap labor and subjects, plus someone needs to consume their products. Because jobs will be limited UBI will be implemented: as a baseline to keep us alive, not as a tool for general prosperity.

Watch "Elysium" how this bleak world may look. It's not a great movie, but has that "everyone but a few people is super fucked"-theme locked down.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago

Not without some "encouragement"

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

No. Total war is our future. Then maybe, but we won't be alive by then

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we replaced all of our current welfare systems with a simple UBI, it would save us money. In terms of running the system, and simplifying taxes. Don't need to take 5 different taxes out of your paycheck, just one. Earn over a certain amount? You don't get it. The majority of people won't, because they'll be earning enough to pay in but not collect. This would have to be done alongside universal healthcare, as tying healthcare to employment wouldn't work much anymore, which would also save us a massive amount of money.

The result of which, is an absolute explosion of creative genius and new businesses. People no longer hindered by the threat of starving in the street, or losing their healthcare, would finally be able to start that business they always wanted to. They'd be able to create their long-overdue masterpiece. Literature, art, new inventions. There's a guy out there right now that, if given the space and a bit of assistance, could create the first prototype of a warp drive. There's someone else who has a pretty good idea about how to cure dementia, and halt the aging process.

Just imagine the possibilities of actually investing in our people, and in our society, instead of handing all of our money to billionaires, and letting those evil mentally handicapped fuckwits steer the course of humanity straight into a climate change-driven mass-extinction event.

Just Imagine.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 hours ago

Mostly they will just mindlessly consume vices until forced into work.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

UBI to me is a leftist pipe dream of how a post-scarcity society could work. When you actually look at the financials and how greedy humanity is, it all falls apart and will either bankrupt entire nations or pay an absolute pittance.

The UK's voluntary living wage is £13.45 an hour, which translates to £26,227.50 for someone working full time 37.5 hours a week. If we replaced our entire welfare system (state pensions, Universal Credit, child benefit, Personal Independence Payments, Disability Living Allowance, etc) and paid our approx 58.1 million population of working age people and retirees the living wage, it would cost us over £1.5 trillion, or roughly half our annual GDP. Our current welfare expenditure by comparison is at an estimated £333.7 billion.

I am using the Living Wage as a comparison since it's an agreed metric calculated by a non-profit organisation for how much a worker would need to earn to live on their wage in the UK. To pay a living wage to every adult in the country we would need to spend nearly three times as much as what the USA spends on its military.

The question then becomes "How the fuck will we pay for it?" We can't even get the rich to pay their fair share of tax as things stand. They are going to flat-out refuse to foot the bill once AI leads to mass unemployment.

What I think is a more likely scenario is societal collapse. People starve, leading to widespread civil unrest and then a brutal and violent crackdown, made easier than ever by armed drones and humanoid robots that have no sense of morals. This is exactly the kind of doomsday scenario that a lot of billionaires are prepping for.

The only way I can see humanity not ripping itself apart is if automation somehow makes the cost of living so cheap that UBI could viably exist.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're forgetting to factor in all the people that won't receive it because they already earn enough. A majority of people won't get anything at all. Replacing all of our current welfare systems with a simple UBI would save us money. It's just that the billionaires are under the impression that it would stop people from working harder for a better life, which is also something they think about our current welfare system, and has never been true.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm talking about a scenario where entire industries of workers end up getting displaced by AI and robotics, and I don't think we're far off from this becoming a reality. If Tesla's Optimus 3 robots are anywhere near as advanced as they are rumoured to be, they could easily replace warehouse and logistics workers.

We already have Waymo disrupting the taxi industry further by removing the driver from the equation, and Miso Robotics automating kitchens in restaurant chains like Jersey Mike's Subs and White Castle.

Also, doesn't means-testing UBI kinda defeat its intended purpose?

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New tools used to replace workers happens throughout the course of human history, I don't think we will ever see robots replace humans successfully enough to really dent the workforce, they'll just go to other industries.

Though the one industry whose collapse could spur the entire UBI system, is long-haul truckers. That may happen, but again, I think they'll just go into other off-shoot industries, and the change in workforce won't be so dramatic that it's one day they're all on the road with jobs, and the next day they're all out of work. You'll need truckers with experience to actually park the things for loading/un-loading, and nobody is going to trust an AI or robot with piloting that much freight all by itself. they'll want a human behind the wheel, ready to take over.

The industry we should be driving people towards is computer chip manufacturing.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Each technological advancement has created new jobs in some capacity. What new jobs has AI created? And don't tell me "prompt engineer" like every AI bro likes to hype up. That is not an actual position and the fact that I cannot find any jobs advertised where typing out very specific and accurate prompts are one of the skills required is proof of this.

AI isn't perfect. It hallucinates and sometimes gives bad answers. But I think that we are one incredibly good model away from being able to reliably automate white collar work.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Ah, I think AI is shite, and most people reliably hate it. It's just a new fad that will be sectioned off for tiny use-cases in the future, I don't think it will reliably be able to do anyones job at scale

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

The rich have done everything they can to increase wealth inequality and brainwash the public into acceptance. That will not be reversed. If they allow UBI it will be below poverty levels and highly conditional.

The wealthy want slaves. Its a mental illness with them. Black people. Underage sex trafficking. Working poor. Robots. Last thing they want is a utopia where everyone is healthy, happy and financially independent.

One of the wealthiest countries in the world doesn't even have proper healthcare system in 2026. No way are those dumb fucks getting a UBI. Its a lie.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, but only because your question implies there is a future for humanity, and I believe UBI is realistically one of the few ways humanity even gets a future

[–] Alexfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Would be nice but the wealthy won't allow it. You can trace back to when the wealth/power inequality ramped up and those with the power will never let it go, and worse with their propaganda on all the socials most scroll mindlessly. The same methods to keep people going along with the flow was used way back then and still today. Keep people in low-level thinking, don't question, just obey supernatural explanations, Perry's scheme 1-3 of 9, they use all the neurological tricks like fear, reward, belonging, etc so people comply and conform, just what the owners and those who also benefit from the high-control systems want.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I think we already have a rudimentary form of UBI in the debt system. You're born with a certain level of creditworthiness, which you can "spend" on getting credit.

[–] Nobody@anarchist.nexus 120 points 3 days ago (8 children)

When UBI starts being seriously considered on a large scale, you’ll likely see a massive influence campaign against it. Something along the lines of “If you give people free money, they’ll never get a job.” It will likely have racial undertones that range from subtle and implicit to wildly explicit, depending on the forum.

If low information working class people, those who would benefit the most from such a program, fall for that campaign, as they often do, you’ll see a backlash against it that could prevent it from becoming law.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 87 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I talked with my mother about this years ago. She confidently said, if you give people free money, nobody will do any work. I argued but she wouldn't budge.

She is now comfortably retired, and makes hats with her time, and sells them. But that's different.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gabelstapler@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No. Once the people have the time and leisure to think and mingle they might find out who the real source of the problem is. So it's better to keep your slaves busy and struggling to keep the roof over their head and their belly not empty.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I don't honestly think it will happen in a way that is genuinely good for people. It will happen in a way where the rich and powerful are in control and can use it as a method for maintaining control.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

No because corps and oligarchs will campaign against it, inexplicably win, and destroy one of the country's greatest achievements with cheers and applause

Its cynical, but its happened to many social programs thay way.

[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The billionaires would have to fund it, and I don’t believe for a second they wouldn’t leave us all to starve.

load more comments (2 replies)

It should be. Also the NIT (Negative Income Tax) so the taxing scheme becomes progressive, rather than regressive. Though I know I'm asking too much because capitalism...

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (14 children)

UBI is a bandaid to keep capitalism propped up by neo-liberals. It's contingent on the idea that society is dependent on people spending money, rather than getting essential services and enough free time to maintain mental stability.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

UBI will only come as a response to a new economic depression. The idea that our society will proactively fix itself has been proven wrong time after time.

Humans only learn the hard way.

load more comments
view more: next ›