this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
206 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87833 readers
3250 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
206
LG smart TVs caught logging audio with screen off and snooping on local devices (www.notebookcheck.net)
submitted 3 hours ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

An investigation by Gamers Nexus found LG smart TVs sweep local networks to map phones and nearby devices. Tests also showed the sets can capture microphone audio with the screen off — they then upload data once reconnected to the internet.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] graycube@lemmy.world 7 points 34 minutes ago

My LG TV runs WebOS, which is a linux distro. I have been wondering how hard it is to root and replace with a distro of my own choosing. I had thought because my TV is pretty old that I was safe from the more sophisticated spying, but last week it interrupted what I was watching and would not let me continue using it without agreeing to new terms of use. This revived my interest in rooting it.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago) (2 children)

And that's why I have a VLAN without outbound connections allowed. Still allows me to cast to the device from a separate vlan but the TV has no internet at all.

[–] sickday@fedia.io 7 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Seriously, this is the way. I did this too in about 15 mins. Also setup a simple rule to allow the vlan to reach my homeserver in a separate vlan specifically on Plex and Jellyfin ports. That's it. They cant phone home. You still enjoy your own media.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 32 minutes ago

Yeah if you setup the firewall correctly you can access the TV but the TV can't access anything it self.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 29 minutes ago

Did this a few month back. Then my Sony TV decided to hide all apps when it has no internet for a few weeks. I guess when the internal disk is filling up and it needs to phone home again. What a shit show!

So I had to connect again, but now https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.spocky.projengmenu is running, to hopefully never be coerced to go online again.

Jellyfin ftw.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 4 minutes ago

I guess it's time to start unplugging everything at the wall when not in use

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

So this is why every product started to go standby, low power mode, instead of turning off.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 58 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

Secretly recording conversations in peoples homes sounds like it should be against the law in a number of countries.

Imagine someone working for the government, security services, or a defence contractor. I suspect LG may be in trouble with a number of National Security agencies.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 minutes ago

Or hired by those same agents of authority.

[–] Seppo@sopuli.xyz 40 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It is illegal. Unfortunately crime is legal for corporations. They just pay the crime fee and can continue undisturbed. Shareholders must be held responsible individually, otherwise it will only get worse.

[–] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago

Not shareholders. Decision makers. Upper msnagement. Shareholders shpuld pay in share value (the finantial penalty to the corporations should be high enough to affect that), bu the personal an criminal responsibility belongs to managers, CEO in particular.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

Shareholders must be held responsible individually

So, are you personally on the hook here because the company managing your pension fund is holding stocks in LG? Because that technically makes you a shareholder as it was bought with your money, right?

Edit: not sure why I get downvoted, this is a legitimate concern/nuance to the debate. The managing company doesn't own these stocks so they're not the shareholders, that's the people whose money they are managing, but these people are not directly in control of the funds. Who is the liable party in this?

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 37 minutes ago

The highest level employee/officer who had knowledge of it should be held responsible

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago) (1 children)

The fact that a pension fund can hold shareholds is crazy by itself, also, is the pension found a company or managed by your state? It shouldn't really be a thing in first place

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

is the pension fund a company or managed by your state?

Both in my case, as there are both the government pension fund that is mandatory and the one used by my employer which uses one of the large primary pension institutions in my country.

Is it a bit weird that I don't just manage all my pensions myself? Yes, a bit. But it's how its done in my country and it has some tax benefits compared to getting the money in hand and investing myself.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 27 minutes ago

Is it a bit weird that I don't just manage all my pensions myself?

Naah, at least, i don't know anyone that does it in my country

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Recording without consent is very much a crime in any single-party state, but my guess is that the TOS that people click past to use the TV gives them permission to record you. If it didn't, they would be in big legal hot water.

[–] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Clicking through ToS does not magically make illegal things legal.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

Consenting to recording makes recording legal.

Making that consent required to use the TV or its features and it being buried within lengthy, opaque terms of service in a country with a low level of literacy should be illegal, but it stands in the US because it's a consumer hostile country.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Should be. Hope it happens and quickly

[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

Only in trouble if they didn't loop them in on the audio feeds.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 71 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

EU really should regulate against this kind of behaviour

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago) (1 children)

EU lobbies won't ever allow it.

In the later years the EU regulations have been massively disappointing. Only favouring big EU companies and destroying little businesses and the european consumers.

Some disappointing eu regulations:

  • The cookiesgate. Your data is still going around everywhere. You just have a pop up everywhere that means nothing.

  • ¿Replaceable batteries on smartphones? No, only for cheap chinese phones if so. The big players can pay for some european certification on the quality of their batteries and doesn't need to be replaceable.

  • ¿Stop killing games? Hahahaha don't ever think about it.

  • You are buying too much, we need you poorer. So we put up a 3€ tariffs per ~~category~~ product on chinese stores so you are forced to buy the exact same product to an european retailer at twice the price.

  • We heard you like the environment, what about a new complicated tax on packaging so all small business cannot function and only big business are allowed to send products within the european union.

I think the days of the EU legislation saving the day are far off.

[–] MrNobody@quokk.au 2 points 5 minutes ago

Liberalism will always be corrupted by capitalism at the end of the the day. Maybe some systems last a decade or two longer, but it’s all bound to fall.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Problem us that there are too few tech literate politicians

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 3 points 28 minutes ago

Problem is lobbying.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 23 points 1 hour ago

The problem is way worse: big tech ~~contributes to~~bribes politicians to vote according to industry interests.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's not the politicians job to know everything but to make decisions and legislate based on information from the expertise. It is the people in the know that need to make the proposals for the politicians to bring it up. It's us, the tech literate, that need to write proposals that are informative with arguments derived from trusted sources to make the politicians aware that these are concerns that need to be addressed.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Sadly, I don't have time or money to do that. You know who does? Big tech does!

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

Let's all lie belly up and do nothing and accept that nothing will ever change for the better because nobody else is doing it for us and it is impossible for us to change the world all alone. This is exactly the defeatist mindset that the economic elites want people to have.

You could do something small, like find out your representatives and write a personal mail to them, informing them from your point of view. With enough people doing small things and some doing big things the chances for things like this gaining traction are magnitudes bigger than giving up in advance. It takes a few hours to a few days depending on your dedication and whatever cost coffee is in your area of residence.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Great, I wonder what my fridge is up to. It's LG and has wifi for some reason. I never connected it to my network, but I wouldn't be surprised if they take advantage of open networks anyway

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

I tested this when my LG fridge was new, and got a warning when I left the door open. Quite helpful. But still disabled.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

The regular beeping speaker/piezo solves the same problem without WiFi or other shenanigans.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I ran a packet capture on my TV as I left it turned off overnight.

They wake up in the middle of the night, do "stuff" then go back offline. Like a zombie.

[–] klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 1 points 11 minutes ago

I have basically every URL our TV automatically pings blocked at this point. It phones home every 10-30 seconds whether they're off or on. I think when we get a new TV we're looking for a dumb TV

[–] Brennenstein@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Oh, nice. Who doesn't like their fucking TV snooping on them?

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 27 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Ugh. So blocklists were not enough. Time to isolate my telly on the router.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago) (1 children)

You could try to host your DNS, change the router DNS to that and then spend a while to see to which addresses the TV talk to and block them, it's probably time consuming but if you have that time, it can work

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

Yeah, I know. I have a blocklist for LG and other common brands compiled by someone else on my router DNS adblocker. But considering how sneaky they are with collecting information they should stay the fuck away from, I bet they have mechanisms to get around their common ad domains for the data that matters.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If your television is connected to any network at all its already too late.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

Even then it's rumoured some brands of TV try to connect to Bluetooth connected devices to connect to the net. I think that was Samsung.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 hours ago

Amazon Sidewalk - even if you didn't connect it, it could still be spying

[–] bytepursuits@programming.dev 1 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

Isn't that what android does all the time?

[–] ameen272@thelemmy.club 2 points 13 minutes ago

Depends on the ROM/OEM.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My LG TV is not getting network privileges, ever. I wonder if there is a way to turn off the WiFi radio altogether.

[–] jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 hour ago

A soldering iron will do it...

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Welp glad I never put in my WiFi. This’ll be my last LG

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Starting today I'm going to yell epstein files at my tv

load more comments
view more: next ›