this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
342 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

89639 readers
2312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 159 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Victims can open the app and track a tagged suspect’s location and direction of travel once they come within a 2km radius. If that distance falls below 1km, police and probation authorities receive an alert and contact the victim.

seams okay for me

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

That seems pretty short though, surely it would mean you are not allowed to live, work or even vist the same town they live or work in.

Like if anyone I knew was to be my stalker, one of us would have to quit their job and sell their house to relocate.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 74 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Stalking victims frequently have to move regularly to escape their stalkers. Stalkers needing to avoid one town is a minimal restriction for their offense.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sirence@feddit.org 36 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Then they should have thought of that before they started harassing someone.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CheerfulPassionFruit@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is both a fitting punishment and a nightmare from a privacy perspective

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 month ago (12 children)

...and a great security/relief for victims. I'm a vivid apologetic for privacy and security, but this seems like an acceptable thing.

People seem to be fine to be transparent and 24/7 surveilleid with their phones. Some even seem to be fine to install doorcams from US-bigtech or spy-devices that can switch on a light. Heck, they even pay for those!

This at least is a vers useful application of privacy invasion.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

People seem to be fine to be transparent and 24/7 surveilleid with their phones. Some even seem to be fine to install doorcams from US-bigtech or spy-devices that can switch on a light. Heck, they even pay for those!

yeah, not us

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You know what? I'm OK with a panopticon specifically for convicted stalkers. I realize the potential for a slippery slope, but I think the risk is worth it in this one case.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It wont stay confined to stalkers, it'll start being used for poor people in general.

Trangressions like being late to work will be held against you. You know they will.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Don't know about you, but I'm already reprimanded if I'm late for work, whether they're tracking my real time location or not.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

uses data from court-ordered electronic ankle monitors

Soo, your line of thought says that we are all gonna gef an ankle monitor? At that point i doubt the app is the kickstarter of the problem...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

then you'll realize the even bigger slippery slope when you reread the article and discover it is for suspected stalkers

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

The article says suspects, not convicts.

And all this means is they'll be limited to online stalking.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Living on Earth is a nightmare from a privacy perspective.

They have space binoculars pointed at you & AI is allowing them to transcribe everything you say into words even they can understand

[–] Sabdalo@tardigram.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How short will Orswell, Asimov, Huxley or Bradbury be...

[–] brem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aldous would be hunched over from perspective & the weight of understanding.

George is standing tall with a trail of aspiring writers behind him.

Issac is hiding in a cave, pondering the essence of technology.

Ray is floating in a vacuum of space, imagining the concept of oxygen.

All are exactly the same height, 1 book tall. Unless you are counting their bones, which are likely mostly brittle or ash.

[–] Sabdalo@tardigram.com 3 points 1 month ago
[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

It only shows their location within a certain range.

And considering that this is a punishment for violating someone else's privacy I can get behind this.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ankle tags if anyone is wondering:

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a lot cooler than the absolutely nothing they do in the US for stalking victims.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snootseverywhere@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago

This makes more sense since I was thinking if it's based on their gps activity from their phone, that can be spoofed lol

[–] Swemg@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Now do the same with corporations and ceos

[–] brem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Fun fact: Waluigi is famously the evil version of Luigi

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

South Korea gives corporate employees app to track their CEO?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I imagine it makes beeping noises and displays a blip on a radar display like the proximity devices in alien movies. Shudders.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Time to grab the flame thrower

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 month ago

Brother, get the flamer. The heavy flamer.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beep@piefed.world 12 points 1 month ago
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 1 month ago

And so it seems the stalker has become the stalkee. Delicious.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So how does this work if a convicted stalker just lives or works within a few km of where a victim lives or works?

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like another commenter said. Stalking victims already have to move to avoid their stalkers. This puts that responsibility on the offender rather than the victim. And a good relief for the victims

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Ah, TIL, thank you, I didn't see that!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I have no idea, but if I had to guess based on a couple of court cases that came up on youtube, the stalker has some carve out where they can go to work, but they have to take very inconvient ways to get there to minimize proximity to the victim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

It's interesting that I've never seen a single Korean news article about this. And this is a country where even the petty stupid arguments between neighbors make national news.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Imagine getting buzzed every time your stalker's train passed near your apt on their way to work or vice versa.

Yeah. Pretty reasonable tbh this one fuck stalkers

load more comments
view more: next ›