this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
243 points (93.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47969 readers
32 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So many US cities have situations like this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Its the US

Nobody gives a shit about people needing public transportation

Or people suffering from Boise because those are just the stupid poor people

You can't make money off of them so they're useless

[–] motionofethre@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When I lived there Americans would act like I was suffering because I chose to ride my bike home. They would push to give me a ride really hard.

If I tried to take a bus, they would rather drive me around than let me take the bus.

They were very kind, but god they are confused

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like you were acquainted with a lot of kind helpful people in the usa. My experience in the USA riding a bike & bus is that people made fun of me & relegated me to a lower social class. But nobody has ever offered a ride.

[–] motionofethre@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

This was in San Diego. My childhood home was like your experience. Not sure where you were, but some places have a pretty stuck up culture. There are places that aren't so toxic

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It's time for infastructure week!

(who am I kidding)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 week ago

Uogh also just thinking about all the microplasrics and car fumes in the air, not a great experience.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Irving Park on the Blue line was my morning and evening walking nightmare. I always felt so exposed to just a random accident especially a truck tire which I did witness hit the station but no people or trains thankfully.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago

I'd be less concerned about noise and more so flying debris. Interstates are dangerous in that flying debris can be as bad as chunk of spare iron flying.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

*Latest Fad

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What the fuck am i looking at 💀 The european brain cannot comprehend this

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

It's because there's no-one bibbing their horns isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s the electrified third rail.

[–] needanke@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Why is it just exposed like that. That seems needlessly dangerous.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

I think there's 4 rails there. I believe the 1 on the outside is the electrified 3rd rail, the middle is the outside rail, the left is a rail to prevent derailed trains from entering the road, and the 4th rail is not visible in this video.

Here's another perspective of that station:

Garfield Station, Chicago

Also fun fact, there's 2 Garfield Stations in Chicago.

[–] jode@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago

Be happy you at least have access to something resembling public transport

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's also insane that there would be a metro station next to somewhere that no pedestrian ever wants to go.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I’ve realized first handed how much a 24’ wall/ sound barrier does. Like omg it should be all along all highways especially if it’s a bridge over houses just like the other parts of this city.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I saw these in Chicago. Looks like hell.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

We dont have this in Sweden. They are never next to massive highway, not even in Stockholm.

But US is its own "special" category in the world and I hate to see Sweden become more and more Americanized.

On the other hand, why the fuck should I even care about it. The world will do what it will do. Mostly very stupid and insane things these days.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We do have train lines passing highways, including stations near them, but not designed like this, never at the same level without barriers. It's always dozens of meters apart and with more elevation, sometimes on train bridges.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I wonder how that layout even happens. Are rails and highways planned together?

I guess here in Switzerland the rail lines are mostly much older than the highways, and that's why this doesn't feel familiar

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sometimes. Sometimes they create highways in the USA that have a huge gap in the middle so they can add more lanes in the future if needed. Those gaps can sometimes be repurposed for public transport. It's really just lobbyists that have pushed for cars since 1940 so the rich fucks can get richer by selling more cars. America has shit transportation so we can ensure the worst people in society get richer and richer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

I've been to Chicago exactly once in my life, for just about exactly 24 hours, ten years ago. And while I did ride the CTA, it wasn't the Red Line. Why was I instantly able to recognize this as Chicago? Rosemont Station on the Blue Line was my hotel stop, and that's where I thought this was until I googled Garfield Station.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is a very high definition video. Is that just 4k on a phone?

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It’s the frame rate I notice more than the resolution. I think it’s shot at 60fps.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

What does this station serve? The point of public transport is to get you into a populated public area or a commuter station, right next to where houses and people are. You build them where they can/are used I.e. in the middle of suburbia where you can walk to them, not next to a highway.

Do US designers understand passenger rail?

Edit: Nobody has responded in this thread about why the way this is built is good (admittedly this particular station does serve a nearby uni, but I was meaning generally and even so, this station location does not seem the best option), offered solutions or agreed that it's just stupid and shouldn't be this way. And some seem to think that suburbs aren't part of cities. It's baffling.

This is also not the first time a US passenger rail conversation I've had on Lemmy has gone like this. Are you all happy with the way your rail works and your commuter traffic? Do you not see how other places work and compare? Do you understand the point of mass transport or is this something that just isnt experienced/taught in schools. I don't get it. The apathy to fix anything is terrible. It does explain a few things about why you get walked over by your governments though. Truly, it's just a bit sad. It's like you don't even realise it doesn't have to be this way. You never used to be like this.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Seems like it serves at least an entire university and has a dedicated pedestrian bridge.

Dunking on US public transport is easy and fun, so I sympathize, but if we do attempt public transportation it's generally not needlessly stupid. Sometimes it ends up stupid anyway, but I try not to hate unnecessarily. It seems pretty close to the university, and I'm sure there are reasons why it's in the middle of a highway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garfield_station_(CTA_Red_Line)

[–] radix@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Rail sometimes end up in the middle of a highway because the government already owns the land in that median, and it's a lot easier and cheaper to build there than buying and clearing other routes.

The seeds of urban sprawl with shitty transportation were planted decades ago. Fixing it isn't cheap, but some bandaids are easier than others.

Not sure about this station specifically, just speaking broadly

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

it should also be noted that the station has bus connections that jump onto (and come off from,) the highway, serving as a connection between busses coming from places trains don't run to the train.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (10 children)

You realize that people live in cities and not just in suburbia right? They also work and go to school in cities. What the hell are you smoking?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The other side of the station probably has a destination. There’a also one like this in Boston; right against I-93 South on one side, stores and neighborhood on the other. They’ve just crammed all the transit into the smallest corridor possible.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

As others have said, it's near a university.

However, this isn't how you should build public transit, along a corridor. It a) restricts the other mode of transport for evermore b) it encourages growth near the station (which isn't what you would want) c) discourages walking cities d) it's loud af e) it's not in the centre of an area but the outskirts which means it's less usable for the majority of the area and more for only the people hemmed around the highway.

It's like nobody looks at city maps from around the world and how passenger suburban and city rail is a new/difficult concept.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it's in the median of the Dan Ryan Expressway / Interstate 94. The other side is the other direction of traffic. I've seen it in person. It is among the shittiest of shitty American transit stations.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why the fuck would they put it in the median? What the hell?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You're not gonna believe the demographics in the south side of chicago

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody has responded in this thread about why the way this is built is good ([...]), offered solutions or agreed that it's just stupid and shouldn't be this way.

Isn't that refreshing? The video is only 22 seconds long. It's just enough context to show that the highway noise is indeed noisy there.

Most of us don't know what the requirements were when planning and designing this station. Most of us probably never had to plan/design these things. Too many people on the Internet speak with an authoritative tone despite being ignorant of the subject matter. I see no harm in letting a conversation be free of armchair experts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Public transpiration in the US is woefully inadequate, so you won't see me defending it's current state too much. But there is a logic to a line following a highway; clearly this thoroughfare has the demand of people to get from point A to point B; that's why there's a highway there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would there need to be a sound barrier between two things that are both noisy? The only unique thing here is the passenger train running right next to the freeway. But what's the problem? And don't tell me the problem is "noise." Trains & cars are both noisy. If you want a sound barrier, put on noise-canceling headphones.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Maybe OP was complaining about the noise the trains make from the perspective of the cars? /s

The way I instantly recognized that and I don't even live in that state anymore lol

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›