this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
548 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

89099 readers
4988 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not a bad idea, only they are going to keep the wrong ones, the cheerleaders instead of the skeptics.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I kinda wonder about this because I get asked about ai at interviews and I tend to give sort of a balance perspective. Saying they have uses but have limitations and thier output has to be reviewed and checked. I keep wondering if that is sinking me for positions among my other buerocratic red flags.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 49 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

“We need people who can translate AI’s capabilities into better products, stronger execution, and new ways of working — and who approach this change with curiosity, judgment, and urgency,” the email reads.

What a flaming pile of shit.

  • How to effectively use AI is still being figured out. This is akin to "We only hire lucky people".
  • Management clearly is fucking stupid.
  • Isn't the CEO fascist?
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 17 points 19 hours ago

Yeah exactly. What I read here is 'if you're vibe coding all your shit and can spout off a bunch of AI workflow buzzwords you can keep your job or get promoted if not you're probably getting canned'

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago

This is a great time for Tuta take a hard no AI stance

[–] mysterious_cake@feddit.nl 90 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

The more proton news i read, the less I want to renew my subscription when it expires.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 25 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Im happy i demanded a refund of an entire year when yen came out as trumposexual

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 52 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh c'mon. Enshittification this fast.

I don't wanna move all that shit.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That’s not enshittification; enshittification is (to simplify) making a product worse to increase profitability.

In this case the CEO is conducting loyalty tests. It’s more of an HR issue. Groupthink.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 29 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

Cramping AI into everything, including your “privacy” product, is enshittification.

It’s just not really in the same form as capturing market share and then paywalling your captive market to achieve rent seeking.

In this case you aren’t capturing rent you are capturing profiles, which in turn you will rent out to marketers.

Proton will betray everyone. I’m glad I stayed away.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 12 points 18 hours ago

Oh lovely, time to move all of my stuff over to something else

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 32 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (17 children)

That blows. I was genuinely looking into proton after the news that Google will use their shitty AI to scan Gmail. Fuck that.

Like is nothing private anymore? Soon in Europe all your chats will be monitored, email monitored, ID verification, age verification.

Fuck this new internet.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 92 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I used to be curious about switching to proton

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 87 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

I was literally about to do it when that one Proton exec started sucking off Trump on Twitter, and then I changed my mind.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)

Typical Proton L

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 22 hours ago

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.404media.co%2Fproton-to-re-interview-staff-about-ai-to-see-who-gets-to-keep-their-job%2F

Proton, the company behind ProtonMail and other privacy-focused products, told staff on Monday it would be ‘re-interviewing’ staff across the company about how they use AI in their jobs, with the implication that the interviews may decide whether staffers have “continued employment,” according to an internal Proton email obtained by 404 Media.

“These re-interviews are consequential,” a part of the email reads. “Interviewers will document their assessments, which will inform the broader review of our organization and talent. That review may lead to changes in roles, responsibilities, and continued employment. Individual outcomes will be communicated directly once decisions are finalized.”

Proton’s CEO Andy Yen has steadily pushed the company towards more AI use, including launching AI centered products like Lumo, a privacy-focused chatbot. The leaked email says Yen “interviewed more than 40 senior leaders across Engineering and Product to begin this process.” Now, those interviews are extending across the company.

“We need people who can translate AI’s capabilities into better products, stronger execution, and new ways of working — and who approach this change with curiosity, judgment, and urgency,” the email reads.

The email says that not everyone in the company will be re-interviewed, and “any decisions affecting your employment will be communicated separately.” The interviewer will be outside the staff member’s team and reporting line; instead, people may be interviewed by someone from “a pool of leaders who demonstrate strong AI capability and have aligned on the assessment criteria.”

“We recognize that this process creates uncertainty. We will be clear about what has been decided and what remains open, and communicate individual outcomes as soon as we can,” the email adds. It says the re-interviews will take place between November 4 and 11.

Proton did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›