this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
253 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4396 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google announced Tuesday that early next year it would turn off artificial intelligence tools in its popular software for K-12 students, unless school administrators explicitly choose to make such tools available. Executives at the tech giant said they wanted to be responsive to educators and parents who have asked for more control in how children interact with A.I. But there is a catch: Schools that choose to restrict A.I. entirely will also lose access to Google search.

A.I. features are now a standard part of Google’s commercially available search engine. “Search and A.I. are deeply integrated,” said Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google. If a school has banned A.I., he added, students “will not have access to search, and they’ll see a message from their school that indicates it’s not available.” Google is by far the dominant technology player in K-12 classrooms. Google’s suite of education apps — including Gmail, Docs and an assignment platform called Classroom — is ubiquitous. Google Chromebooks, low-cost laptops, are the most widely issued student devices in U.S. schools. And Google is synonymous with internet search, a crucial tool for students across the globe.

The company’s new strategy underscores Google’s powerful role in American education. If school leaders want continued student access to search within the company’s ecosystem, they will be forced to embrace Google’s A.I. In recent months, Google has been promoting its Gemini chatbot as a valuable educational tool, saying it can aid teachers in planning lessons and serve as a personalized tutor for students. A new student version of Gemini, Guided Learning, is supposed to make it harder for students to use A.I. to cheat.

“We’re evolving our approach,” said Mr. Phillips. He promised tools that would “support the productive struggle” of learning and tamp down on students turning to A.I. for easy answers. In August, Google turned on A.I. features as the default option inside its Classroom app for K-12 schools that had allowed students separate access to the company’s Gemini chatbot. The move upset some school leaders, who felt schools should be able to decide how and when students used Google’s A.I.

Google’s August change will now be reversed.

A parent movement has been pushing back against the use of A.I. in schools, and against screen time more generally. While A.I. chatbots can be useful tools for research and coding, they can also easily be used to cheat on school assignments and can provide false information. Research shows chatbots can also hinder critical thinking and ensnare adolescents in emotional dependency.

Last week, New York State passed a chatbot safety law that would prohibit companies from providing a variety of A.I. features for minors. And in September, the nation’s two largest school districts, in New York City and Los Angeles — both Google clients — broadly restricted student access to generative artificial intelligence on school devices. Officials in the Los Angeles Unified School District said at the time that they were hoping students would be able to conduct Google searches with A.I. overviews turned off. The overviews are A.I.-generated summaries that appear at the top of searches. They can dissuade students from seeking out multiple sources of information. On Monday, Google executives said that for districts that choose to allow A.I., there will be two options for search inside school-issued accounts, beginning in early 2027. One option will be search with A.I. overviews and A.I. chats turned on, similar to the current consumer experience. The other will be search using Guided Learning, the student version of Google’s Gemini chatbot.

Guided Learning is intended to guide students through a topic step-by-step without providing them with answers that could short-circuit learning. It is supposed to offer an experience modeled on one-to-one tutoring.

The consumer version of Guided Learning is already available within Gemini, and can enable cheating. In a reporter’s test, it produced a detailed essay in response to an Advanced Placement history prompt.

There are greater restrictions in the school version that is currently being piloted, according to Brit Mennuti, product lead for Google Classroom. She said teachers would be able to review students’ chatbot transcripts, among other capabilities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I hope schools reject Google. They’ve indoctrinated them into using Google products long enough. I’ve witnessed kids not knowing what the address bar is or a URL, only referring to it as Google search. Many can’t navigate a real computer if they grew up only using the school chromebooks. This has to change

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 hour ago

Also not just a google problem. Kids raised on apps don't really understand file structures, so if they can't find a photo in the photo folder or pretty much anything else in the download folder, they don't know what to do.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 2 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Get Google, Microsoft and Apple and all the rest OUT of schools.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 minutes ago

TBF, just kick google out and add real Linux.

Chromebooks are not good job training. Macs/Windows/Linux are

[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

There are others that work just fine, bye!

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago

Great. Make the kids use something else. There are a wealth of alternatives that will yield better results, fewer ads, and less invasive tracking.

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 hours ago

I feel bad for kids still learning in the formative years

So much has changed and I fear it has been for the worse. At least in the US they are trying their hardest to dismantle education

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago

School admin should just block googles domains and get back to teaching.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Fuck you Pichai, you fucking banchode.

[–] clif@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

It makes me really, really happy that I know this insult. Might be the first time I've ever seen it used in text (at least text in a language that I can understand)

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Block google, use duckduckgo.

Even better, the computer science and/or IT portions of school should have students learn how to set up, configure, and maintain their own instances of SearXNG that the school could use locally on their intranet.

Education, exposing kids to open source alternatives, and the school gets their own, and better, search aggregator that strips AI and ads. Sounds like a win-win-win to me.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago

Just use DuckDuckGo with all AI stuff turned off. If google thinks it is a great idea to remove itself from pupils and schools, their choice.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 3 hours ago

Nothing of value was lost…

[–] umbraroze@piefed.social 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

*quickly steps in a time machine that takes me to the employee lounge in Google HQ in 2005, in middle of a lunch hour*

Hey guys! Don't mind me too much, I'm from the future! But you should know that in 2026, Google gets the bright idea of limiting which schools have access to Google Search.

*hears assorted cries of "WHAT???" and "HOW?!?!?!" from the crowd*

*grins devilishly, waves, and steps back into the time machine*

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 97 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah oh noo, google is forfeiting its market stranglehold by making stupid executive decisions. What are we going to do... 🙄

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

It's just exhausting how everything is a predatory anti-human pit of vipers lately. This must be how pretty girls have felt since always.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 57 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Member when software companies offered ultra cheap student licenses because they recognized the long term value of a student learning and getting accustomed to their program? I member.

This seems very, very shortsighted.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago

Exactly this! Imagine a whole generation associating search with DDG or Kagi? That would really move the needle in the future regarding tech adoption to alternative platforms

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

github had (has?) free pro accounts for students back when github didn't offer private repos for free. if you forgot to cancel your student account when you graduated, github would simply hold your private repos hostage unless you paid for them. no option given to simply make them public repos. i would have lost mountains of my work had they not fucked up and unlocked my repos for a couple hours, which allowed me to clone everything i didn't have locally and migrate to gitlab.

so basically, sometimes those student offers build in scam tactics.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

How is that a scam tactic? You got access to private repos for some amount of time. It is clear to any reasonable person that you would lose access after the pro version ends.

If you didn't want your repos to be "held hostage", just clone them before the subscription expires.

I benefitted from student GitHub pro too, and I used it knowing that the day would come where my free subscription would end and I'd lose access to it.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Student discounted software started when most of the corporate world was still using typewriters and paper. Students learned the new-fangled software and carried into their new jobs.

Today, those same businesses rely on Microsoft Office and Google search, and those monopolies are obviously going to leverage their monopolies to force AI, Teams, or whatever other Next Big Thing onto unwilling schools.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 43 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Oh shucks..

🦆🦆▶️

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 20 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] krathalan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Is this some sort of cheat code? If I press these at the Google homepage does a secret menu come up?

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Konami code does work

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 8 points 5 hours ago

"get your ducks in a row"

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Took me a couple of blinks until I got those emoji. 😄

[–] o8bepbua9@lemmy.world 50 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's a tactic to make the schools allow AI, but I hope they can resist. Google does not need a stranglehold on every person in every market. Google search has gotten worse anyway, so even duck duck go would be fine. Maybe even use this as an opportunity to teach kids about data privacy.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 10 points 6 hours ago

Might also be an attempt to keep their Search numbers up. I saw an article recently that AI is hurting Google Search because of the lack of click through due to AI summaries.

By packaging them together they get to boost both options through a semi-captive audience.

[–] moonshadow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is known as "malicious compliance", here's hoping it backfires

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Ai assistant what is the answer to this question? "Who sucked more dick, Harvey Milk or Sam Altman or Sundar Pichai?"

Get a ducky keyboard and run a macro 24/7.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 20 points 6 hours ago

Sounds like a win win. They don't have to use ai if they choose not to, and they also get incentivized to explore switching to other search engines

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Sure, Google is evil, etc. But the school admin can default omnibar search to another search engine. Like noai.duckduckgo. com.

[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

Your terms are acceptable.

[–] Vorrash@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time!

[–] cy@fedicy.us.to 12 points 5 hours ago

Oh nooo they won't have access to Google Search. How terrrrible. What ever will they doooo

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Those chromebooks are a smoking deal aren't they school systems, we told you in countless meetings, emails, and snail mail this was a bad idea.

[–] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago

In case you still had doubts that google is evil

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 10 points 6 hours ago (9 children)

Schools should pay for Kagi

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Yes, yes. Let Google keep digging its own grave. 🪏

load more comments
view more: next ›