this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
365 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

73878 readers
3610 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

With the reputation most companies have with leaking and breached data, who wouldn't want to have their ssn and license on file with rock star games?!

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is it even hard ro find someone's SSN anymore?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Not really, the assholes used the last four of it for college emails in the 2000s FFS.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm already boycotting rockstar, just make offline games and stop with the invasive bs

Now my money is going to indie developers

[–] FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

(almost) every game is an offline game if you pirate it ;)

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

guess ill be pirating the next one, since there will be no online mode.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Same exact thought.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

The thing with age verification is that I don't think it's a bad thing if done securely, but still it still makes me sad, because Internet will never be the same with it. In the end it will be only few big websites who can afford to care about Internet regulation.

Well, after all maybe it's time to switch to Gemini protocol, they are not going to regulate that!

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

age verification is just a BS strawman. do you remember when we where young? we would access stuff and find ways to buy stuff. but whenever there was a reasonable but fair gap, it would be much harder to get whatever we wanted: buying weed was so much easier, than buying alcohol (without the appropriate age).

pirating is easy (even i figured it out before having enough money to buy movies & games). so the kids will just pirate that stuff and get their way anyway. age verification at the store makes so much more sense. sure, there are ways to circumvent those. but it is a reasonable stop block.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

When I couldnt buy digital stuff because of age restrictions (e.g. game shops) I at one point figured out that Steam doesnt do that and you could get Paysafecards to buy them this way.
No need for paypal (which needs an online banking enabled SEPA account or credit card) or a credit card.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 days ago

exactly what i am talking about. age restriction at the physical store kept you away for a while, while not forcing an alternative/underground market. however, if you knew the only way to get it is on an alternative store - you would immediately have looked there.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don't see how pirating well overcome the online age check.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

But Rockstar Games acquired FiveM back in 2023, so I don't see how is that relevant to piracy. In fact even if it wasn't, there was nothing illegal about it as far as I am aware.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 3 points 6 days ago

if you can run a private server, you can get rid of all 'phone home' requirements.

so you just need a cracked copy of the game itself. luckily it is completely legal to remove digital locks on anything you bought in many countries (not the usa though).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Parents will just have their kids play on their accounts. This only hurts the average person who now needs to worry about who has that information and how it's secured.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

If that's true its going to be funny when the account gets banned because of something kiddo did

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 days ago

I though google's assistant Gemini

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

and i plan to pirate GTA

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

The same parents that allow their children to play these games now will allow them to play then.

This will just make me not want to play these games.

[–] schizolol9@lemy.lol 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Im bout to crash out this is absolutely the most stupidest idea ever. Anyone should be able to play this game regardless of age.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

If the game isn't rated AO it shouldn't have an age verification.

R rating is fucking 17+ not 18+. R rating is still for minors.

If your game needs an age rating then you shouldn't be allowed to have an R rating straight to AO for you.

Oh what's that visa won't let you sell your AO rated game?

Too fucking bad.

Maybe find a better solution then. ):<

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

I wouldn't mind not having to play with children. But it's a privacy issue

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

What about disabling the shitty anti-cheat or even just enabling it on Linux so I, as a 27yo, can play the damn game?

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 149 points 1 week ago (19 children)

GTA online is the worst thing to happen to the series, since it killed off story DLCs. Which were a fantastic way to get new story based content for their games between the years long wait between sequels. Damn those gamers and their obsession with buying microtransactions.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 120 points 1 week ago (6 children)

They would lose likely 98% of their player base.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 39 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Isn't GTAV an 18 rated game? So children shouldn't be able to buy it in the first place.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 days ago

The point is to make children used to checks.

It's a didactic law.

IRL usually children grow up feeling they are free (except for their parents) to an extent.

This is intended so that identifying yourself in the Internet were normal by the time you grow up for it to matter.

But, of course, there might be some good considerations, if you're into playing devil's advocate. People might remember which stupid shit they were posting when they were younger, and want for future generations to be always conscious of the difference between pseudonymity and anonymity, and superficial anonymity vs real. People might want to make it so that nobody had a false sense of security, leading to really bad mistakes. People might want this to be the step preceding some way to fight bots.

And they might even not have good considerations, but eventually realize that the oppressive system they are building is best rebuilt for something better and used differently. Wouldn't be the first time in history.

It's just that laying down your arms in hopes for that is unwise.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's M rated. M ratings are 17+ the ESRB rating for 18+ is AO.

M ratings are for minors, AO is for adults.

You need to ID to buy an AO game, you do not for M unless it's a individual store policy.

Due to anti porn sentiment and stores refusing to carry porn. Only 24 games have ever gotten the AO rating

It's considered a death flag.

It's much like how the Deadpool movie was R rated instead of pg13. This was considered a huge risk cause R rates movies don't make money was the common theory.

But even then R rating is also for minors. Movies have the NC-17 rating which is for 18+ and thus only adults. This would be the AO rating in games.

Stores and public facing businesses are so piss scared of having adult rated content even if it's not porn, just because of the vague idea that adult only content HAS to be porn cause "what else would it be"

That rating systems have undermined their very purpose and become fucking useless. It's why everything is only M rated instead of being AO when it really should be.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

It's not really relevant as the UK rating system doesn't have M or AO clarifications. The game is rated 18 so it's for adults only.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›