this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
759 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

88122 readers
2597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Business owned by greedy manbaby says to give money to business also owned by greedy manbaby. Hmmm....

Don’t forget Nazi

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That will work out as well as the death tunnel (formerly hyperlink)

[–] putainsdetoiles@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

SpaceX can fuck right off with that plan.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Musk = POS Nazi.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I’m so glad other countries are coming up with their own satellites just for the expressed interest to boycott musk.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Low orbit satellites will never replace fiber because physics of latency, bandwidth and error correction.

As far as things go today well never need less fiber. Even if we cover the sky with satellites eventually we'd need to upgrade to fiber because its literally impossible to beat. Except for scifi tech like quantum entanglement networks which might not even be possible or practical and wouldn't need the satelites anyway.

As an infrastructure bet it makes absolutely zero sense except for covering rare niches like war zones or oceans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I say that Emma Stone should divorce her husband and marry me instead.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

I would burn the money before giving it to the nazi

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's dumb about this statement is all Elon would have to do is market to all the places where broadband companies refuse to go and be affordable. tRump already killed the rural broadband initiatives. There's literally no competition and word-of-mouth could probably pull in more who are unhappy with their broadband provider.

However, capitalism and greed are cancers that know no limit...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sagan_Wept@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a dumb ass idea, and I'm literally on Starlink right now

[–] bigbabybilly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I sure am sick of super fast, stable internet connections. Let’s all get something that fucks up when it’s cloudy.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

We should also dump passenger trains for...electric car tunnels?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Here's a better idea: nationalize SpaceX and tell Musk to go fuck himself first. Not going to happen? Then no grant money.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago

Goat says garden needs more carrots.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You cannot actually serve hundreds of millions in the US even if you invested the 75B it would cost to give every household a satellite it just can't support the bandwidth.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Musk is still hitting the special K.

[–] WaistGunnerPug@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Fuck. That.

katy says spacex should go fuck themselves and go bankrupt

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›