this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
147 points (75.6% liked)

World News

49392 readers
1300 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A scientist has made the shocking claim that there's a 49% chance the world will end in just 25 years. Jared Diamond, American scientist and historian, predicted civilisation could collapse by 2050. He told Intelligencer: "I would estimate the chances are about 49% that the world as we know it will collapse by about 2050."

Diamond explained that fisheries and farms across the globe are being "managed unsustainably", causing resources to be depleted at an alarming rate. He added: "At the rate we’re going now, resources that are essential for complex societies are being managed unsustainably. Fisheries around the world, most fisheries are being managed unsustainably, and they’re getting depleted.

"Farms around the world, most farms are being managed unsustainably. Soil, topsoil around the world. Fresh water around the world is being managed unsustainably."

The Pulitzer Prize winning author warned that we must come up with more sustainable practices by 2050, "or it'll be too late".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teolan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

We need to send a bunch of scientists to the edge of the ~~galaxy~~ globe to create a foundation that will help reduce the duration of the chaos to only a millennia.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 days ago
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Calling Jared diamond a historian is just nonsense.

The minute I saw his name I rolled my eyes.

Move along nothing to see here.

[–] Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

I do believe this to be true, capitalism has already hit its peak of extraction, water has entered the asset market, similar to gold, housing and diamonds. Humanity is in for a massive shock, migration, collapse of political systems. I will be fragging the billionaire bunkers if anyone cares to join me.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 74 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Why 49% and not 50%?" "I wanted it to sound more accurate than it is"

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Totally. I assume his error margin is about 30 times that difference

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So that's why I planned to live in mountains and grow my own food. I thought I was high. Thanks Science.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (12 children)

What does collapse even mean? All humanity dies? Fifty percent of humanity dies? Many die and those that don't revert to Mad Max life styles?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The collapse of society "as we know it" where we as a species cannot survive by following the same.lifestyle we have depended on in the past.

Our company helps manage a significant percentage of a critical piece of nationwide infrastructure. With what I see everyday, my wife and I have decided to buy fertile land that can be farmed and has its own source of subterranean water so that we can grow enough food to survive (we already switched to plant based diets). We also are investing heavily so that our home can be "off-grid". Summer is covered, but we are still working on winter power generation.

We are not at "prepper" level, but if you're building a new home, why not try to build in some resiliency?

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny I'm in the process of going solar and where I live, I'm not allowed to go off grid. How stupid is that?

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't allowed to go off grid in my previous home where I had solar installed either. There was also a hard cap on the amount of solar I was allowed to install. Both of these rules were put in place due to lobbying from the largest power company in the region (Duke Energy in my case). It totally sucks,

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Was it Florida because that's where I am and the rules are the same as what you've stated?

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm on the East Coast. So I wonder what happens if you put enough solar on your house to go off grid and then just don't pay your power company? They put you in jail? LOL.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 42 minutes ago

Sorry, I don't recall the actual specifics now. I believe it was something like they made it a code violation to not have your home connected to the power grid and you just get fined and harassed until you "fix" it.

[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is something historians struggle with, because "Collapse" has happened before, the most famous of which might be the Bronze Age Collapse, or the fall of the western Roman Empire in 473. Needless to say, those didn't result in human extinction, or even the extinction of human habitation in those locations (so Greece was inhabited before the Bronze age collapse, but that predates Classical Greece, which we think of as it's golden age, and one for humanity).

Specifically, it was (natural) climate change or political turmoil (those usually go hand in hand) making long established trade routes and subsistence patterns untenable, and with it, destroying the power of the people who controlled that trade. There was a reduction in trade, as the elites had the money to import, and the disposition to distinguish themselves from the lower classes. There was certainly some population reduction, because food was not moving as much, and populations were reduced to what the locality could support. I want to note that at this point, we see migrations (although we do see violence). I want to thank Patrick Wyman's podcast for teaching me this answer.

So I think, in this case, I think its likely we see this. The current power structure will probably not survive, although pockets of it may hold on in places, and maybe even survive into the next iteration (so think about the Catholic Church, an ancient roman institution survives to this day). Instead, I expect to see local polities spring up, holding on to or rejecting various aspects of the old world. A process of balkanization implies the rest of the world looks on in horror, but I expect to see some process of it happening everywhere. Immediately, these fragments will resemble the world we recognize, but in the centuries that follow, the world will become unrecognizable to us.

I think its also important to note that like, the destruction of the social order, which would suck for a lot of reasons (like the development of technology like vaccines), doesn't necessarily mean a "dark age." Some knowledge was lost (like Roman concrete in the fall of Rome) but I dont think the fall of the modern world precludes the loss of electricity, or motor vehicles, or even something like the telephone.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the answer but I'm still not really certain what it would mean to me. I mean if these fascists went away, it might be worth it. Just depends on who rises to take their place.

[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You just asked what does collapse means, and I knew the answer. I certainly don't know what it would mean for you.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Well the purpose for asking what a world collapse looks like was to determine what life for a typical person would be and I consider myself to be a typical person (in the US). I kind of view it like the beginning of the movie Interstellar.

In that movie people still had houses but there were items that were in short supply. People had chronic illnesses and there wasn't much that could be done, so they would die prematurely. Crops were failing and it looked like the end of all, or virtually all, life was approaching. I wonder if that's what it looks like.

A lot of the answers were on a macro scale not a sort of day to day life scale. That's what I meant about what it would mean to me.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

no more strawberry frosted doughnuts at Dunks.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

And no more Fortnite Battle Pass®.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Calling Jared Diamond a scientist is pushing it.

[–] CuffsOffWilly@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I was thinking the same thing so I looked him up and he has a BSc in biochemical science (Harvard) and a PhD from Cambridge in biophysics of the gallbladder. Colour me shocked. Still, kind of stepping outside his zone of expertise on this grand statement.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Popsci author repeats claim he's been using for decades to sell books that most anthropologists question".

Man, sometimes I think newspapers and traditional media should be banned from reporting on science at all. I am very critical of social media and what Internet does to communication, but I'll admit that the extremely focused experts that communicate on a narrow field for a living do a much, much better job of parsing published claims than traditional generalist news ever did. I am exhausted of impossible galaxies, stars that "should not exist", healthy superfood, cures for cancer and world-ending events.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I checked my magic 8 ball, we are screwed

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’d rather the magic 8 ball make our decisions than most politicians. We’d have a higher chance of survival

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would estimate the chances are about 49% that the world as we know it will collapse by about 2050.

Emphasis added. That's a pretty big bit of weasel-wording there, the world "as we know it" has changed drastically in the past 25 years. Things that we thought were indispensable to the proper functioning of the world order - such as, for example, the lack of a pudding-brained pedophillic fascist in the White House - are no longer operative. Yet we're muddling along well enough, all things considered.

Things are rapidly changing in so many ways right now. Projecting that far forward with any confidence is a bit of a fool's errand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 49 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Wow, Jared Diamond and a tabloid.

This seems no more or less likely than before.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's playing it very save with 49%. As if he knew math or something

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, that was another red flag. Margins of error on any kind of calculation like this are going to be big; "roughly half" would be a strong claim. Coming out with an exact percentage about a social sciences issue is crackpot territory.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago (7 children)

MIT predicted society would collapse by 2040 back in the 70s.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That model keeps getting tweaked and rerun, as others have mentioned, its from 'The Limits to Growth, otherwise known as the 'World 3 model'.

In this one, instesd of measuring 'pollution', which was....fairly difficult to get accurate data on... they just used CO2 instead.

Pretty much same result, we are pretty much at the peak of modern civilization right now.

IIRC, thats a screen grab from Paul Beckwith, a pretty well renowned climate scientist... he has a youtube channel, he puts out like a 20ish slide powerpoint recapping other recent climate studies every week or so ...

Basically we are fucked, all our climate models from 5 or 10 years ago were actually too optimistic, we already blew through 1.5C, the SMOC, the Anatactic part of the thermohaline cycle, already collapsed a decade ago, and we did not notice untill the last few months.

We are tracking closer to the '8.5C by 2100' level of climate sensitivity models than anything else.

Insurance companies are basically already abandoning roughly the lower third of the US, too much climate disaster danger, can't afford to insure homes and neighborhoods.

UK Society of Actuaries recently put together their own risk assessment, from the ground up instesd of top down as the World 3 model... they are also predicting massive losses, economic damage, begging governments and insurance companies and banks to adopt mitigation strategies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well I already knew I wouldn't manage to retire...

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Well at least this means there's a 50% chance I won't need the retirement savings that Im not going to have

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Y'know, Quasimodo predicted all this.

load more comments
view more: next ›