this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69298 readers
4155 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Can anyone knowledgeable tell us if this is feasible, practical, or a good idea?

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

With tariffs and sanctions, it has become clear that open standards which can’t be controlled by governments are what is needed.

With what’s been happening over the past few years, there will be a lot of interested in this. Recently, I’ve seen lots of news about it, but that could just be the algorithm.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, yes and yes, but it'll take a while. It's a six year project overall.

[–] cocolowlander@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Feasible, yes. Practical, hard to say. Good idea, yes.

RISC-V is open-source architecture based in Switzerland (although it started in University of California).

One thing going for it is China is spending billions a year towards RISC-V adoption so they do not get sanctioned by the US. You need money and engineers working on it towards these type of open source to compete with existing players.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not knowledgeable enough to answer, but I know China's also going big on RISC-V.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The great thing about RISC-V if you care about sovereignty in an age where CPUs run the world is that it's an open standard. Contrast this with x86 which is owned in some part by US-based Intel and some part by US-based AMD as well as ARM which is owned by Japanese-owned, UK-based Arm Holdings. If you want to use x86, you're shelling out license money to Intel and AMD, and if you want to use ARM, you're shelling out license money to Arm Holdings. You never truly "own" what you're producing.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the way

[–] TheGreyGhost@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

Considering that you can buy some Raspberry Pi micro computers (these are ARM architecture computers) for less than €100 that are performance competitive with a lot of existing hardware; this idea would make a ton of sense for Europe to implement. I think Europe could probably start designing and manufacturing chips locally within 2 to 5 years on the low end 5 to 10 years on the high end.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ARM is a UK-based company. If they hadn't dropped out of EU, it's possible they would have settled on an ARM-based supercomputer design.

Chalk it up to another WIN for Brexit!

[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ARM was bought by the Japanese, it's no longer European. RISC-V is the future.

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Not just by the Japanese but by Softbank and Son Masayoshi, the guy now doing buddy-buddy photo ops & "Stargate AI" with Trump.

[–] sevenOfKnives@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

lol those are dram chips in the stock photo.

(more risc v investment away from the us is a good thing though!)

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago